{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T08:34:01Z","timestamp":1782894841322,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,8]],"date-time":"2026-05-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778198400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":54,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Implant Dent"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the effect of three-segment scanning on the accuracy of digital impressions of full-arch implants obtained using intraoral scanners.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      An edentulous master model with six implants was digitized using a laboratory scanner to create a reference scan. Three intraoral scanners (Primescan, Aoralscan 3 and Trios 5) and two scan strategies were evaluated (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200910): full-scan (simultaneous full-arch scan) and segmented-scan (the arch categorized into three segments, scanned independently, and subsequently composed into a full-arch dataset) groups. The reference data were scanned using a laboratory scanner. Surface deviation was evaluated with a tolerance of \u00b1\u200950\u00a0\u03bcm. The percentage of the total scan body surface area within this tolerance range was calculated as surface trueness. The overall distance deviation between scan bodies was measured to determine linear trueness and precision.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      For Aoralscan 3 and Trios 5, the segmented-scan group showed higher surface trueness than the full-arch scan group, whereas Primescan showed no statistically significant difference between the scan strategies. The overall distance deviation showed no significant differences in trueness between the full-arch and segmented scans for Primescan, Aoralscan 3, or Trios 5 (all\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&gt;\u20090.05). However, precision was significantly higher under the segmented-scan condition than with full-arch scanning for all evaluated intraoral scanners (all\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.01).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For full-arch implant impressions using intraoral scanners, segmented scanning with subsequent composition into a full-arch digital model improved intraoral scanning accuracy compared with simultaneous full-arch scanning.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-026-00692-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,8]],"date-time":"2026-05-08T11:44:34Z","timestamp":1778240674000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Effect of three-segment scanning on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation: an in vitro study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Yuki","family":"Sato","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yusuke","family":"Uto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tetsurou","family":"Odatsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Masami","family":"Arai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takashi","family":"Sawase","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"692_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12531","volume":"27","author":"JS Kern","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kern JS, Kern T, Wolfart S, Heussen N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):174\u201395.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 25","key":"692_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13931","volume":"34","author":"A Messias","year":"2023","unstructured":"Messias A, Karasan D, Nicolau P, Pjetursson BE, Guerra F. Rehabilitation of full-arch edentulism with fixed or removable dentures retained by root-form dental implants: a systematic review of outcomes and outcome measures used in clinical research in the last 10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(Suppl 25):38\u201354.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"692_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(03)00212-9","volume":"90","author":"CJ Goodacre","year":"2003","unstructured":"Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(2):121\u201332.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"3","key":"692_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.07.017","volume":"117","author":"AC de Paula Silveira","year":"2017","unstructured":"de Paula Silveira AC, Chaves SB, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):386\u201392.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"692_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12567","volume":"27","author":"P Papaspyridakos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen C-J, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):465\u201372.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"692_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.10.029","volume":"120","author":"RM Mizumoto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(3):343\u201352.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"692_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13548","volume":"31","author":"K Miyoshi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Miyoshi K, Tanaka S, Yokoyama S, Sanda M, Baba K. Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(1):74\u201383.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"692_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.07.010","volume":"64","author":"H Kihara","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):109\u201313.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"692_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-020-01254-9","volume":"20","author":"FG Mangano","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):263.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"issue":"S2","key":"692_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13785","volume":"32","author":"C Zarauz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zarauz C, Prad\u00edes GJ, Chebib N, D\u00f6nmez MB, Karasan D, Sailer I. Influence of age, training, intraoral scanner, and software version on the scan accuracy of inexperienced operators. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(S2):135\u201341.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"3","key":"692_CR11","first-page":"128","volume":"28","author":"M Imburgia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Imburgia M, Kois J, Marino E, Lerner H, Mangano FG. Continuous scan strategy (CSS): a novel technique to improve the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020;28(3):128\u201341.","journal-title":"Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent"},{"issue":"3","key":"692_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.07.010","volume":"111","author":"FS Andriessen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(3):186\u201394.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"5","key":"692_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.07.014","volume":"121","author":"GH Park","year":"2019","unstructured":"Park GH, Son K, Lee KB. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(5):803\u201310.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"692_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104266","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104266","volume":"125","author":"P Kanjanasavitree","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kanjanasavitree P, Thammajaruk P, Guazzato M. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans. J Dent. 2022;125:104266.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"692_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.identj.2024.01.015","volume":"74","author":"T Zhang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhang T, Yang B, Ge R, Zhang C, Zhang H, Wang Y. Effect of a Novel \u2018scan body\u2019 on the in vitro scanning accuracy of full-arch implant impressions. Int Dent J. 2024;74(4):847\u201354.","journal-title":"Int Dent J"},{"issue":"3","key":"692_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-017-2217-9","volume":"22","author":"M Menini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1253\u201362.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"692_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104741","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104741","volume":"139","author":"M Klein","year":"2023","unstructured":"Klein M, Tuminelli FJ, Sallustio A, Giglio GD, Lerner H, Berg RW, et al. Full-arch restoration with the NEXUS IOS\u00ae system: a retrospective clinical evaluation of 37 restorations after a one year of follow-up. J Dent. 2023;139:104741.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"5","key":"692_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2020.12.5.299","volume":"12","author":"B Diker","year":"2020","unstructured":"Diker B, Tak \u00d6. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(5):299\u2013306.","journal-title":"J Adv Prosthodont"},{"key":"692_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hajaj T, Veja I, Zaharia C, Lile IE, Rominu M, Sinescu C et al. Evaluation of digital imaging accuracy among three intraoral scanners for full-arch implant rehabilitation. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;16(1).","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics16010025"},{"key":"692_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104561","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104561","volume":"135","author":"Y Ke","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ke Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Chen H, Sun Y. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2023;135:104561.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"692_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3761750","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/3761750","volume":"2018","author":"M Alikhasi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M. Three-dimensional accuracy of digital impression versus conventional method: effect of implant angulation and connection type. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:3761750.","journal-title":"Int J Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"692_CR22","first-page":"167","volume":"12","author":"AG Wee","year":"1999","unstructured":"Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(2):167\u201378.","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"4","key":"692_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.04.002","volume":"63","author":"A Di Fiore","year":"2019","unstructured":"Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Graiff L, Savio G, Vigolo P, Monaco C, et al. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63(4):396\u2013403.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"692_CR24","first-page":"270","volume":"6","author":"T Jemt","year":"1991","unstructured":"Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Br\u00e5nemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6(3):270\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"issue":"7","key":"692_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13598","volume":"31","author":"R Huang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Huang R, Liu Y, Huang B, Zhang C, Chen Z, Li Z. Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(7):625\u201333.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"692_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2022.09.010","volume":"132","author":"A Abdelrehim","year":"2024","unstructured":"Abdelrehim A, Etajuri EA, Sulaiman E, Sofian H, Salleh NM. Magnitude of misfit threshold in implant-supported restorations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(3):528\u201335.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"692_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2021.13.2.107","volume":"13","author":"P Thanasrisuebwong","year":"2021","unstructured":"Thanasrisuebwong P, Kulchotirat T, Anunmana C. Effects of inter-implant distance on the accuracy of intraoral scanner: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(2):107\u201316.","journal-title":"J Adv Prosthodont"},{"key":"692_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104391","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104391","volume":"129","author":"D Borbola","year":"2023","unstructured":"Borbola D, Berkei G, Simon B, Romanszky L, Sersli G, DeFee M, et al. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy. J Dent. 2023;129:104391.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"692_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104761","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104761","volume":"139","author":"Y Pan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pan Y, Dai X, Wan F, Song C, Tsoi JK, Pow EH. A novel post-processing strategy to improve the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scanning for implants: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2023;139:104761.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"692_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105336","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2024.105336","volume":"150","author":"U Hauschild","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hauschild U, Lerner H, Weigl P, Porr\u00e0 T, Admakin O, Mangano FG. Effects of the intraoral scanner and implant library on the trueness of digital impressions in the full-arch implant scan: a comparative in vitro study. J Dent. 2024;150:105336.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"6","key":"692_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.09.016","volume":"117","author":"JE Kim","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(6):755\u201361.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"692_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.01.003","volume":"123","author":"RM Mizumoto","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr., Seidt J, Johnston WM. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):96\u2013104.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"692_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104702","volume":"138","author":"HK Wu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wu HK, Wang J, Chen G, Huang X, Deng F, Li Y. Effect of novel prefabricated auxiliary devices attaching to scan bodies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of complete-arch with multiple implants: An in-vitro study. J Dent. 2023;138:104702.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"692_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-021-00397-w","volume":"7","author":"R Masu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Masu R, Tanaka S, Sanda M, Miyoshi K, Baba K. Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital impressions for implants placed in edentulous maxilla: an in vitro study. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):116.","journal-title":"Int J Implant Dent"},{"issue":"12","key":"692_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1466","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13847","volume":"32","author":"Y Pan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pan Y, Tsoi JKH, Lam WY, Zhao K, Pow EH. Improving intraoral implant scanning with a novel auxiliary device: an in-vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(12):1466\u201373.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"692_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13982","volume":"33","author":"FR Kernen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kernen FR, Recca M, Vach K, Nahles S, Nelson K, Fl\u00fcgge TV. In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(10):1010\u201320.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"692_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.2186\/jpr.JPR_D_24_00261","volume":"69","author":"K Ashida","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ashida K, Sanda M, Tanaka S, Baba K. Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital implant impressions for fully edentulous maxilla: an in vivo study. J Prosthodont Res. 2025;69(4):526\u201332.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"Suppl30","key":"692_CR38","first-page":"S155","volume":"37","author":"TR Schoenbaum","year":"2026","unstructured":"Schoenbaum TR, Lin GH, Brunello G, Strauss FJ, Schwarz F, Jung RE, Wang HL. 1st Global consensus for clinical guidelines for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: a single-round survey on the number of implants, timing of implant placement, and loading for fixed restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2026;37(Suppl30):S155\u201365.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"692_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s40510-020-00337-1","volume":"21","author":"YG Moon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Moon YG, Lee KM. Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1):36.","journal-title":"Prog Orthod"},{"key":"692_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2024.105503","volume":"153","author":"A Limones","year":"2025","unstructured":"Limones A, \u00c7akmak G, Fonseca M, Roccuzzo A, Cobo-V\u00e1zquez C, G\u00f3mez-Polo M, et al. Impact of scanning interruptions on accuracy of implant-supported full-arch scans: an in-vitro pilot study. J Dent. 2025;153:105503.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"692_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37367","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-20524-6","volume":"15","author":"JH Lee","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lee JH, Jo JS, Lee SY. Digital impression accuracy for bone-level and tissue-level implants using scan bodies of different heights. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):37367.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"692_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2024.105310","volume":"150","author":"M G\u00f3mez-Polo","year":"2024","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez-Polo M, Cascos R, Ortega R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, P\u00e9rez-Barquero JA, et al. Influence of scanning pattern on accuracy, time, and number of photograms of complete-arch implant scans: a clinical study. J Dent. 2024;150:105310.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"4","key":"692_CR43","first-page":"341","volume":"24","author":"A Mehl","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mehl A, Reich S, Beuer F, G\u00fcth JF. Accuracy, trueness, and precision: a guideline for the evaluation of these basic values in digital dentistry. Int J Comput Dent. 2021;24(4):341\u201352.","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"key":"692_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105973","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2025.105973","volume":"161","author":"F Grande","year":"2025","unstructured":"Grande F, Nuytens P, Zahabiyoun S, Iocca O, Catapano S, Mijiritsky E. Factors influencing the intraoral implant scan accuracy: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2025;161:105973.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"692_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12528","volume":"32","author":"E Dutton","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dutton E, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Culp A, et al. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):204\u201318.","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Implant Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40729-026-00692-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40729-026-00692-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40729-026-00692-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T06:34:35Z","timestamp":1782887675000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s40729-026-00692-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,8]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["692"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40729-026-00692-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2198-4034"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2198-4034","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 March 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"32"}}