{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T22:58:34Z","timestamp":1793314714876,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,18]],"date-time":"2021-05-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621296000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,18]],"date-time":"2021-05-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621296000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Health Research Board","award":["HRB-TMRN-2017-1"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["HRB-TMRN-2017-1"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Res Involv Engagem"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In line with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki, it is the investigator\u2019s responsibility to ensure that research participants are sufficiently informed, to enable the provision of informed consent. The Participant Information Leaflet\/Informed Consent Form is key to facilitating this communication process. Although studies have indicated that clinical research Participant Information Leaflets\/Informed Consent Forms are not optimal in terms of accessibility, there is little or no specific guidance available. The aim of this research was to propose and agree a set of guidelines for academic researchers and sponsors for preparing accessible and understandable Participant Information Leaflets\/Informed Consent Forms.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A literature review identified guidance for the preparation of patient-facing documents. Following critical appraisal, key recommendations were extracted and a set of recommendations which can be applied to clinical research Participant Information Leaflets\/Informed Consent Forms were prepared. These recommendations were evaluated and amended by an Expert Consensus Conference consisting of a group of key stakeholders. The stakeholders included members of a Research Ethics Committee (both lay and expert), a patient advocate, experienced clinical researchers, a plain English editor and a Data Protection Officer. Consensus was reached regarding a final set of recommendations.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>44 recommendations were agreed upon and grouped into five categories: Layout, Formatting, Content, Language and Confirming Readability. These recommendations aimed to maximize accessibility for lay participants, including readers with dyslexia, literacy or numeracy challenges, thereby improving the quality of the consent process.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>More empirical research is needed to further improve the informed consent process for research participants. However, these recommendations are informed by the current literature and have been ratified by expert stakeholders. It is hoped that these recommendations will help investigators and sponsors to consistently and efficiently produce more accessible clinical research Participant Information Leaflets\/Informed Consent Forms.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40900-021-00265-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,18]],"date-time":"2021-05-18T11:02:38Z","timestamp":1621335758000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":48,"title":["Preparing accessible and understandable clinical research participant information leaflets and consent forms: a set of guidelines from an expert consensus conference"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Eleanor","family":"Coleman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7131-5048","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lydia","family":"O\u2019Sullivan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1472-4117","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rachel","family":"Crowley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Moira","family":"Hanbidge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Se\u00e1n","family":"Driver","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2082-5117","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thilo","family":"Kroll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aoife","family":"Kelly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4689-1238","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alistair","family":"Nichol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Orlaith","family":"McCarthy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3229-2661","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Prasanth","family":"Sukumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2064-5335","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Peter","family":"Doran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"265_CR1","volume-title":"Principles of biomedical ethics","author":"TL Beauchamp","year":"2013","unstructured":"Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.","edition":"7"},{"key":"265_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"World Medical Association\u00a0Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA.\u00a02013;310(20):2191\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama"},{"issue":"1","key":"265_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-230X-8-22","volume":"8","author":"C Felley","year":"2008","unstructured":"Felley C, Perneger TV, Goulet I, Rouillard C, Azar-Pey N, Dorta G, et al. Combined written and oral information prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with oral information alone: A randomized trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008;8(1):22.","journal-title":"BMC Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"6803","key":"265_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.303.6803.610","volume":"303","author":"N Lyn\u00f6e","year":"1991","unstructured":"Lyn\u00f6e N, Sandlund M, Dahlqvist G, Jacobsson L. Informed consent: study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. Br Med J. 1991;303(6803):610\u20133.","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"265_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O'Sullivan L, Sukumar P, Crowley R, McAuliffe E, Doran P. The readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9). https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/content\/10\/9\/e037994.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-037994"},{"key":"265_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Terblanche M, Burgess L. Examining the readability of patient-informed consent forms.\u00a0Open Access J Clin Trials. 2010;2:157\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/OAJCT.S13608.","DOI":"10.2147\/OAJCT.S13608"},{"issue":"7","key":"265_CR7","first-page":"1","volume":"9","author":"A Samadi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Samadi A, Asghari F. Readability of informed consent forms in clinical trials conducted in a skin research center. J Med Ethics History Med. 2016;9(7):1\u20139.","journal-title":"J Med Ethics History Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"265_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-020-04969-w","volume":"22","author":"T Pietrzykowski","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pietrzykowski T, Smilowska K. The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient comprehension\u2014systematic review. Trials. 2021;22(1):57.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"3","key":"265_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.14.141390","volume":"93","author":"NT Tam","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tam NT, Huy NT, le TB T, Long NP, Trang NT, Hirayama K, et al. Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(3):186\u201398.","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"key":"265_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelly CM, Feighery R, McCaffrey J, Higgins M, Smith M, O'Reilly S, et al. 1465P_PRDo oncology patients understand clinical trials? A nationwide study by Cancer Trials Ireland. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_5). https:\/\/www.esmo.org\/newsroom\/press-office\/Cancer-Patients-Struggle-with-Key-Aspects-of-Clinical-Trial-Methodology.","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdx440.068"},{"issue":"2","key":"265_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdn623","volume":"20","author":"O Berger","year":"2008","unstructured":"Berger O, Gr\u00f8nberg BH, Sand K, Kaasa S, Loge JH. The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. Ann Oncol. 2008;20(2):379\u201385.","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"265_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-018-9843-z","volume":"15","author":"RE McWhirter","year":"2018","unstructured":"McWhirter RE, Eckstein L. Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia. J Bioethical Inquiry. 2018;15(2):243\u201357.","journal-title":"J Bioethical Inquiry"},{"key":"265_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clarke N, Vale G, Reeves EP, Kirwan M, Smith D, Farrell M, et al. GDPR: an impediment to research? Irish J Med Sci. 2019;188:1129\u201335.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11845-019-01980-2"},{"key":"265_CR14","unstructured":"General Data Protection Regulation. European Union. 2018."},{"key":"265_CR15","unstructured":"International Council on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Good Clinical Practice Guidelines E(6) R(2). In. Brussels: World Health Organization; 2016."},{"key":"265_CR16","unstructured":"Plain English Guidelines. National Adult Literacy Agency. Ireland. 2008. ISBN:\u00a01-871737-96-6.\u00a0https:\/\/www.nala.ie\/publications\/plain-english-guidelines-at-a-glance\/. Accessed 8 Apr 2021."},{"key":"265_CR17","volume-title":"The European Medical Writers Association: The Plain English Commission","author":"M Cutts","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cutts M. Making leaflets clearer for patients. In: The European Medical Writers Association: The Plain English Commission; 2015."},{"key":"265_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1109\/ISTAS.1996.540447","volume-title":"1996 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technical Expertise and Public Decisions Proceedings: 21\u201322 June 1996 1996","author":"IS Mayer","year":"1996","unstructured":"Mayer IS, Geurts JL. Consensus conferences as participatory policy analysis, a methodological contribution to the social management of technology. In: 1996 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technical Expertise and Public Decisions Proceedings: 21\u201322 June 1996 1996; 1996. p. 231\u201341."},{"key":"265_CR19","volume-title":"Improving Consensus Development for Health Technology Assessment: An International Perspective. edn.: National Academies Press (US)","author":"C Goodman","year":"1990","unstructured":"Goodman C, Baratz SR. Format and Conduct of Consensus Development Conferences: A Multination Comparison. In: Improving Consensus Development for Health Technology Assessment: An International Perspective. edn.: National Academies Press (US); 1990."},{"key":"265_CR20","unstructured":"Writing Plain English Government of Australia https:\/\/guides.service.gov.au\/content-guide\/writing-style\/ Accessed 8th October 2020."},{"key":"265_CR21","unstructured":"How to write in Plain English. Plain English Campaign. 2021.\u00a0http:\/\/www.plainenglish.co.uk\/how-to-write-in-plain-english.html. Accessed 8 Apr 2021."},{"key":"265_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S. Chapter 4: Systematic reviews of text and opinion.\u00a0In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.\u00a0JBI, 2020. Available from\u00a0https:\/\/synthesismanual.jbi.global.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.46658\/JBIMES-20-05.","DOI":"10.46658\/JBIMES-20-05"},{"key":"265_CR23","unstructured":"Toolkit for producing patient information. Version 2.0 United Kingdom: Department of Health; 2003.\u00a0https:\/\/www.uea.ac.uk\/documents\/746480\/2855738\/Toolkit_for_producing_patient_information.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2021."},{"key":"265_CR24","unstructured":"Always read the leaflet - getting the best information with every medicine. Report of the Committee on Safety of Medicines Working Group on Patient Information,\u00a0United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority; 2005.\u00a0https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/391090\/Always_Read_the_Leaflet___getting_the_best_information_with_every_medicine.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 202."},{"key":"265_CR25","unstructured":"Plain Language Style Guide. In. Ireland: Health Services Executive; National Adult Literacy Agency; 2009."},{"key":"265_CR26","unstructured":"Best practice guidance on patient information leaflets. In: United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority; 2014."},{"issue":"5","key":"265_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1177\/1524839914538969","volume":"15","author":"C Baur","year":"2014","unstructured":"Baur C, Prue C. The CDC Clear Communication Index Is a New Evidence-Based Tool to Prepare and Review Health Information. Health Promotion Practice. 2014;15(5):629\u201337.","journal-title":"Health Promotion Practice"},{"key":"265_CR28","unstructured":"Assess, Select and Create Easy-to-Understand Materials: Tool #11. In., 2nd edition edn. Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Last reviewed 2015."},{"key":"265_CR29","unstructured":"Doak L, Doak C, Root J. Suitability Assessment of Materials. In: 2nd Edition edn. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills: J. B. Lippincott Company; 1996. p. 49\u201359."},{"key":"265_CR30","unstructured":"The A to Z of alternative words: Plain English Campaign. United Kingdom 2001.\u00a0https:\/\/www.plainenglish.co.uk\/files\/alternative.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2021."},{"key":"265_CR31","unstructured":"Sless D, Shrensky R. Writing about medicines\u00a0for people. In: Australian Self-Medication Industry. 3rd ed; 2006"},{"key":"265_CR32","unstructured":"How to produce an information brochure for patients and users of the healthcare system. Haute Authorit\u00e9 de Sant\u00e9.\u00a0France. 2008.\u00a0https:\/\/www.has-sante.fr\/upload\/docs\/application\/pdf\/2009-10\/how_to_produce_an_information_brochure_-_methodology_guide.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2021."},{"key":"265_CR33","unstructured":"Guideline on the readability of the labelling and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use (revision 1). In.\u00a0Edited by Consumer goods P. Brussels: European Commission; 2009."},{"key":"265_CR34","unstructured":"Strategic and Proactive Communication Branch: Simply Put, A guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. 3rd edition edn. Atlanta Georgia: CDC; 2009."},{"key":"265_CR35","unstructured":"Health Literacy and Plain Language Overview. National Partnership of Women and Families 2009."},{"key":"265_CR36","unstructured":"Federal Plain Language Guidelines. 2nd edition. Government of the United States of America; 2011.\u00a0https:\/\/www.plainlanguage.gov\/media\/FederalPLGuidelines.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2021."},{"key":"265_CR37","unstructured":"Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and User's Guide. In: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2019."},{"key":"265_CR38","unstructured":"Everyday Words for Public Health Communications. In.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016."},{"key":"265_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moberg J, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Treweek S, Badenoch D, Layfield R, Harbour R, et al. I C: The plain language Glossary of Evaluation Terms for Informed Treatment choices (GET-IT) at www.getitglossary.org. Res All. 2018;2(1):106\u201321.","DOI":"10.18546\/RFA.02.1.10"},{"key":"265_CR40","unstructured":"Rudd RE: Guidelines for Creating Materials:\u00a0Resources for Developing and Assessing Materials. HarvardUniversity.\u00a0https:\/\/cdn1.sph.harvard.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/135\/2012\/09\/resources_for_creating_materials.pdf\/. Accessed 8 Apr 2021."},{"key":"265_CR41","unstructured":"Plain English Checklist for documents, Plain English Checklist for forms. Dublin: National Adult Literacy Agency; 2008.\u00a0https:\/\/www.nala.ie\/publications\/a-plain-english-checklist-for-documents\/. https:\/\/www.nala.ie\/publications\/a-plain-english-checklist-for-forms\/.\u00a0Accessed 8 Apr 2021."}],"container-title":["Research Involvement and Engagement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40900-021-00265-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40900-021-00265-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40900-021-00265-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,18]],"date-time":"2021-05-18T11:14:04Z","timestamp":1621336444000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40900-021-00265-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,18]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["265"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40900-021-00265-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2056-7529"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2056-7529","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 January 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 March 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was granted a low-risk ethical exemption by the University College Dublin Research Ethics Committee (REC) \u2013 Ref LS-E-20-94-OSullivan-Doran.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"31"}}