{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T17:34:07Z","timestamp":1787765647565,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782691200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782691200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Umea University"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Res Involv Engagem"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In coproduced research, competing priorities among researchers and partners often surface as the work progresses, making such processes rarely tension-free. Although coproduction approaches are increasingly used in mental health research, there is limited understanding of how tensions are managed and how this influences collaboration. Hence, the aim of the study is to explore how tensions emerge within coproduced research by analysing the conditions, interactions, and processes influencing their emergence and management.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study was conducted within UserInvolve, a six\u2011year Swedish research programme involving a national service user organisation as its principal partner. Using an exploratory qualitative design, the study examined coproduction in the programme. Data were collected in two stages: (1) preparatory exploration through six group interviews concerning coproduction processes with subproject group participants, including researchers, representatives from service user organisations, national agencies, service providers (2) in-depth exploration through four group interviews focusing explicitly on tensions with a purposeful sample of participants from stage one. An abductive analytical approach was used, combining inductive interpretations with a deductive framework of four tension types: organising, learning, performance, and belonging. The analysis proceeded through four phases: exploratory analysis, condensation, collective interpretation and final synthesis within the author group.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All four tension types were identified, reflecting structural constraints, negotiations of knowledge, competing purposes and questions of legitimacy in collaboration. A finding was that dynamics of power \u2014 epistemic, organisational, and relational \u2014 cut across all tensions and shaped how participants interpreted situations, negotiated roles, and understood legitimate expertise. What appeared as practical challenges often reflected deeper shifts in authority, knowledge, and expectations. Tensions also acted as generative mechanisms that prompted participants to question assumptions and develop new ways of working. Strategies for managing tensions included adaptive reflexivity, shared learning, renegotiation of roles, and sustained relational investment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Tensions are inherent to coproduced mental health research and can function as productive forces that support and strengthen collaboration, learning, and epistemic development. Findings indicate that tension\u2011based approaches require greater attention to power, which fundamentally shapes how tensions arise and are managed. Recognising tensions as potentially generative may strengthen the design and evaluation of coproduced research.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40900-026-00934-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T19:42:27Z","timestamp":1782762147000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Tensions as productive forces in coproduced mental health research: an explorative qualitative study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-2626-6829","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anneli","family":"Gustafsson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8755-3710","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hilda","family":"N\u00e4slund","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6330-5640","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Urban","family":"Markstr\u00f6m","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Conny","family":"Allaskog","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Filippa Gagn\u00e9r","family":"Jenneteg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9405-4418","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elisabeth","family":"Argentzell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7236-0836","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katarina","family":"Grim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4438-6673","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Petra","family":"Svedberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"934_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1282700","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyt.2023.1282700","volume":"14","author":"U Markstr\u00f6m","year":"2023","unstructured":"Markstr\u00f6m U, N\u00e4slund H, Sch\u00f6n UK, Rosenberg D, Bejerholm U, Gustavsson A, et al. Developing sustainable service user involvement practices in mental health services in Sweden: the Userinvolve research program protocol. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1282700.","journal-title":"Front Psychiatry"},{"key":"934_CR2","volume-title":"Legitimizing the knowledge of mental health service users in shared decision making: Promoting participation through a web-based decision","author":"K Grim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Grim K. Legitimizing the knowledge of mental health service users in shared decision making: Promoting participation through a web-based decision. support tool: Dalarna University; 2019."},{"issue":"4","key":"934_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1108\/MHRJ-10-2015-0030","volume":"20","author":"M Clark","year":"2015","unstructured":"Clark M, Pinfold V, Szymczynska P, Hamilton S, Peacocke R, Dean S, et al. Co-production in mental health research: reflections from the People Study. mental health Rev. 2015;20(4):220\u201331.","journal-title":"mental health Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1812270","DOI":"10.1080\/17482631.2020.1812270","volume":"15","author":"O Knutsson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Knutsson O, Sch\u00f6n U-K. Co-creating a process of user involvement and shared decision-making in coordinated care planning with users and caregivers in social services. Int J qualitative Stud health well-being. 2020;15(1):1812270.","journal-title":"Int J qualitative Stud health well-being"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1186\/s40900-025-00759-3","volume":"11","author":"A Gustafsson","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gustafsson A, Markstr\u00f6m U, N\u00e4slund H, Svedberg P. Development and validation of the UserInvolve comprehensive toolkit for evaluating co-production in research: A guiding resource for researchers. Res Involv Engagem. 2025;11(1):93\u201314.","journal-title":"Res Involv Engagem"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e70084","DOI":"10.1111\/dar.70084","volume":"45","author":"DM Russell","year":"2026","unstructured":"Russell DM, Morrison E, Grebely J, Treloar C, Gobeil J, Doumany J, et al. Navigating the Gap: An Examination of Funder Rhetoric and Reality Regarding Community-Research Partnerships. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2026;45(1):e70084.","journal-title":"Drug Alcohol Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"934_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1080\/09687599.2021.1930519","volume":"38","author":"A Faulkner","year":"2023","unstructured":"Faulkner A, Thompson R. Uncovering the emotional labour of involvement and co-production in mental health research. Disabil Soc. 2023;38(4):537\u201360.","journal-title":"Disabil Soc"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1186\/s12961-023-00990-y","volume":"21","author":"RKD McLean","year":"2023","unstructured":"McLean RKD, Carden F, Aiken AB, Armstrong R, Bray J, Cassidy CE, et al. Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ\u2009+\u20094 Co-Pro). Health Res policy Syst. 2023;21(1):51.","journal-title":"Health Res policy Syst"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1186\/s12961-018-0375-0","volume":"16","author":"K Beckett","year":"2018","unstructured":"Beckett K, Farr M, Kothari A, Wye L, Le May A. Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: Exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model. Health Res policy Syst. 2018;16(1):118.","journal-title":"Health Res policy Syst"},{"issue":"3","key":"934_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"902","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.13470","volume":"25","author":"D Masterson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Masterson D, Areskoug Josefsson K, Robert G, Nylander E, Kjellstr\u00f6m S. Mapping definitions of co-production and co\u2010design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future. Health expectations: Int J public participation health care health policy. 2022;25(3):902\u201313.","journal-title":"Health expectations: Int J public participation health care health policy"},{"key":"934_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bandola-Gill J, Arthur M, Leng RI. What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives. Evid Policy: J Res Debate Pract. 2023;19(2):275\u2009\u2013\u200998.","DOI":"10.1332\/174426421X16420955772641"},{"issue":"5","key":"934_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2001403","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.2001403","volume":"15","author":"A Filipe","year":"2017","unstructured":"Filipe A, Renedo A, Marston C. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biol. 2017;15(5):e2001403.","journal-title":"PLoS Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-021-00782-1","volume":"8","author":"M Farr","year":"2021","unstructured":"Farr M, Davies P, Andrews H, Bagnall D, Brangan E, Davies R. Co-producing knowledge in health and social care research: reflections on the challenges and ways to enable more equal relationships. Humanit social Sci Commun. 2021;8(1):1\u20137.","journal-title":"Humanit social Sci Commun"},{"issue":"7","key":"934_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1108\/IJPSM-08-2017-0222","volume":"31","author":"N Aschhoff","year":"2018","unstructured":"Aschhoff N, Vogel R. Value conflicts in co-production: governing public values in multi-actor settings. Int J Public Sect Manage. 2018;31(7):775\u201393.","journal-title":"Int J Public Sect Manage"},{"issue":"4","key":"934_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1080\/14719037.2018.1508608","volume":"21","author":"S Jaspers","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jaspers S, Steen T. Realizing public values: enhancement or obstruction? Exploring value tensions and coping strategies in the co-production of social care. Public Manage Rev. 2019;21(4):606\u201327.","journal-title":"Public Manage Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1186\/s12961-019-0432-3","volume":"17","author":"K Oliver","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oliver K, Kothari A, Mays N. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res policy Syst. 2019;17(1):33\u201310.","journal-title":"Health Res policy Syst"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/s43058-022-00385-0","volume":"4","author":"P van der Graaf","year":"2023","unstructured":"van der Graaf P, Kislov R, Smith H, Langley J, Hamer N, Cheetham M, et al. Leading co-production in five UK collaborative research partnerships (2008\u20132018): responses to four tensions from senior leaders using auto-ethnography. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4(1):12\u20135.","journal-title":"Implement Sci Commun"},{"issue":"2","key":"934_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1111\/spol.12468","volume":"53","author":"K Allen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Allen K, Needham C, Hall K, Tanner D. Participatory research meets validated outcome measures: Tensions in the co-production of social care evaluation. Social policy Adm. 2019;53(2):311\u201325.","journal-title":"Social policy Adm"},{"issue":"2","key":"934_CR19","first-page":"381","volume":"36","author":"WK Smith","year":"2011","unstructured":"Smith WK, Lewis MW, Toward a theory of, paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manage Rev. 2011;36(2):381\u2013403.","journal-title":"Acad Manage Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.5465\/19416520.2016.1162422","volume":"10","author":"J Schad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Schad J, Lewis MW, Raisch S, Smith WK. Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward. Acad Manage annals. 2016;10(1):5\u201364.","journal-title":"Acad Manage annals"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-022-08626-7","volume":"22","author":"M Haring","year":"2022","unstructured":"Haring M, Freigang F, Amelung V, Gersch M. What can healthcare systems learn from looking at tensions in innovation processes? A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1\u20131299.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-023-10323-y","volume":"23","author":"M Haring","year":"2023","unstructured":"Haring M, Schiller J, Gersch M, Amelung V. Why should stakeholders consider the effect of tensions in collaborative innovation in healthcare\u2014lessons learned from surveying integrated care projects in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):1\u201317.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"934_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Behrendt K, Ramanuj P. Factors in implementing integrated care\u2026 a duty to collaborate?Factors in implementing integrated care\u2026 a duty to collaborate? Integr Healthc J. 2020;22(11).","DOI":"10.1136\/ihj-2019-000025"},{"key":"934_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1353\/book5183","volume-title":"Getting lost: feminist efforts toward a double(d) science","author":"P Lather","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lather P. Getting lost: feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. 1st ed. Albany: State University of New York; 2007.","edition":"1"},{"key":"934_CR25","first-page":"170","volume-title":"Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach","author":"AW-A Neidel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Neidel AW-A, Trine. The Ethics of Involvement with the Already Involved. In: Phillips L, Kristiansen M, Vehvil\u00e4inen M, Gunnarsson E, editors. Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach. Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM: Taylor & Francis Group; 2012. pp. 170\u201388."},{"key":"934_CR26","unstructured":"NSPH. NSPH:s organisation Accessed 18 Feb 2026 Available from: https:\/\/nsph.se\/om-oss\/var-organisation\/."},{"key":"934_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412984249","volume-title":"Exploratory research in the social sciences","author":"RA Stebbins","year":"2001","unstructured":"Stebbins RA. Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, [Calif.];: SAGE; 2001."},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1080\/10401334.2025.2475098","volume":"38","author":"F Khurshid","year":"2026","unstructured":"Khurshid F, Veen M, Thompson J, Hegazi I. Navigating Thematic Analysis: Practical Strategies Grounded in Abductive Reasoning. Teach Learn Med. 2026;38(1):106\u201315.","journal-title":"Teach Learn Med"},{"key":"934_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Adm policy mental health mental health Serv Res. 2015;42(5):533\u201344. Purposeful Sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10488-013-0528-y"},{"issue":"8","key":"934_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1176\/appi.ps.201600282","volume":"68","author":"J Hamann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hamann J, B\u00fchner M, R\u00fcsch N. Self-Stigma and Consumer Participation in Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Services. Psychiatric Serv (Washington DC). 2017;68(8):783\u20138.","journal-title":"Psychiatric Serv (Washington DC)"},{"key":"934_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780198754428.001.0001","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox","author":"WK Smith","year":"2017","unstructured":"Smith WK, Lewis MW, Jarzabkowski P, Langley A. The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017."},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.5465\/19416520.2016.1162421","volume":"10","author":"LL Putnam","year":"2016","unstructured":"Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S, Contradictions. Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach. Acad Manage annals. 2016;10(1):65\u2013171.","journal-title":"Acad Manage annals"},{"issue":"3","key":"934_CR33","first-page":"619","volume":"24","author":"A Candela","year":"2019","unstructured":"Candela A. Exploring the Function of Member Checking. Qualitative Rep. 2019;24(3):619\u201328.","journal-title":"Qualitative Rep"},{"key":"934_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j3453"},{"issue":"3","key":"934_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1108\/MHRJ-01-2017-0009","volume":"22","author":"K James","year":"2017","unstructured":"James K, Quirk A. The rationale for shared decision making in mental health care: a systematic review of academic discourse. Mental health Rev J. 2017;22(3):152\u201365.","journal-title":"Mental health Rev J"},{"key":"934_CR36","unstructured":"Gaim M, Clegg S, e Cunha MP, Berti M. Organizational paradox. cambridge: cambridge university press; 2022. Available from: https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/12CF7333392DE655D9D9AE38015FAE55."},{"issue":"2","key":"934_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.5465\/amr.2017.0208","volume":"46","author":"M Berti","year":"2021","unstructured":"Berti M, Simpson AV. The Dark Side of Organizational Paradoxes: The Dynamics of Disempowerment. Acad Manage Rev. 2021;46(2):252\u201374.","journal-title":"Acad Manage Rev"},{"key":"934_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fricker M. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. 2007.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198237907.001.0001"},{"key":"934_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"981238","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyt.2022.981238","volume":"13","author":"K Grim","year":"2022","unstructured":"Grim K, N\u00e4slund H, Allaskog C, Andersson J, Argentzell E, Brostr\u00f6m K, et al. Legitimizing user knowledge in mental health services: epistemic (in) justice and barriers to knowledge integration. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:981238.","journal-title":"Front Psychiatry"},{"issue":"2","key":"934_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1111\/hypa.12142","volume":"30","author":"JMC Kwong","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kwong JMC. Epistemic Injustice and Open-Mindedness. Hypatia. 2015;30(2):337\u201351.","journal-title":"Hypatia"},{"issue":"2","key":"934_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/s40737-019-00145-9","volume":"6","author":"K Grim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Grim K, Tistad M, Sch\u00f6n U-K, Rosenberg D. The Legitimacy of User Knowledge in Decision-Making Processes in Mental Health Care: An Analysis of Epistemic Injustice. J psychosocial rehabilitation mental health. 2019;6(2):157\u201373.","journal-title":"J psychosocial rehabilitation mental health"},{"issue":"2","key":"934_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1080\/2159676X.2022.2052946","volume":"15","author":"B Smith","year":"2023","unstructured":"Smith B, Williams O, Bone L. Collective tMSWC-p. Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences. Qualitative Res Sport Exerc Health. 2023;15(2):159\u201387.","journal-title":"Qualitative Res Sport Exerc Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"934_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2034","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.13261","volume":"25","author":"JD Worsley","year":"2022","unstructured":"Worsley JD, McKeown M, Wilson T, Corcoran R. A qualitative evaluation of coproduction of research: \u2018If you do it properly, you will get turbulence\u2019. Health expectations: Int J public participation health care health policy. 2022;25(5):2034\u201342.","journal-title":"Health expectations: Int J public participation health care health policy"},{"issue":"1","key":"934_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1186\/s40900-021-00262-5","volume":"7","author":"SE Knowles","year":"2021","unstructured":"Knowles SE, Allen D, Donnelly A, Flynn J, Gallacher K, Lewis A, et al. More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production. Res Involv Engagem. 2021;7(1):34.","journal-title":"Res Involv Engagem"},{"issue":"5","key":"934_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e70014","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.70014","volume":"27","author":"I Hopkins","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hopkins I, Verlander M, Clarkson L, Jacobsen P. What Do We Know About Sharing Power in Co-Production in Mental Health Research? A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis. Health Expect. 2024;27(5):e70014.","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"key":"934_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graneheim UH, Lindgren B-M, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse education today. 2017;56:29\u201334.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nedt.2017.06.002"},{"key":"934_CR47","volume-title":"Civil society and state relations in Sweden","author":"M Micheletti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Micheletti M. Civil society and state relations in Sweden. 1st ed. London;: Routledge; 2017.","edition":"1"},{"issue":"4","key":"934_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1080\/2156857X.2019.1583599","volume":"10","author":"H N\u00e4slund","year":"2020","unstructured":"N\u00e4slund H, Sj\u00f6str\u00f6m S, Markstr\u00f6m U. Delivering experiential knowledge: repertoires of contention among Swedish mental health service user organisations. Nordic social work Res. 2020;10(4):369\u201381.","journal-title":"Nordic social work Res"}],"container-title":["Research Involvement and Engagement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40900-026-00934-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40900-026-00934-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40900-026-00934-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T19:42:33Z","timestamp":1782762153000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s40900-026-00934-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["934"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40900-026-00934-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["2056-7529"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2056-7529","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 March 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 June 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority No. [2023-00507-01]. Written and verbal information about the aim of the study was provided to the participants, and informed consent was obtained.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"103"}}