{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T15:30:19Z","timestamp":1788881419269,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]],"date-time":"2024-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1716508800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]],"date-time":"2024-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1716508800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JA Clin Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is an independent risk factor for prolonged postoperative stay and hospital death. Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are prone to develop PIH. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for PIH in patients undergoing TAVI.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This single-center retrospective observational study included 163 patients who underwent TAVI. PIH was defined as at least one measurement of systolic arterial pressure &lt;90\u2009mmHg or at least one incident of norepinephrine infusion at a rate &gt;6 \u00b5g\/min from anesthetic induction until 20\u2009min post-induction. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a predictive model for PIH in patients undergoing TAVI.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In total, 161 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of PIH was 57.8%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that baseline mean arterial pressure \u226590 mmHg [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.413, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.193\u20130.887; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.023] and higher doses of fentanyl (per 1-\u00b5g\/kg increase, aOR: 0.619, 95% CI: 0.418\u20130.915; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.016) and ketamine (per 1-mg\/kg increase, aOR: 0.163, 95% CI: 0.062\u20130.430; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.002) for induction were significantly associated with lower risk of PIH. A higher dose of propofol (per 1-mg\/kg increase, aOR: 3.240, 95% CI: 1.320\u20137.920; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>=0.010) for induction was significantly associated with higher risk of PIH. The area under the curve (AUC) for this model was 0.802.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The present study developed predictive models for PIH in patients who underwent TAVI. This model may be helpful for anesthesiologists in preventing PIH in patients undergoing TAVI.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40981-024-00717-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]],"date-time":"2024-05-24T04:01:46Z","timestamp":1716523306000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Predictive model for post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective observational study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Kohei","family":"Noto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Satoshi","family":"Uchida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hirotaka","family":"Kinoshita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4005-9536","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daiki","family":"Takekawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tetsuya","family":"Kushikata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kazuyoshi","family":"Hirota","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"36","key":"717_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2739","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehx391","volume":"38","author":"H Baumgartner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. ESC\/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(36):2739\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehx391.","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"issue":"23","key":"717_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2187","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1103510","volume":"364","author":"CR Smith","year":"2011","unstructured":"Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, Corso P, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock SJ. PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1103510.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"19","key":"717_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1875","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2022.5776","volume":"327","author":"The UK TAVI Trial Investigators","year":"2022","unstructured":"The UK TAVI Trial Investigators. Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(19):1875\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2022.5776.","journal-title":"JAMA."},{"issue":"3","key":"717_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000175214.38450.91","volume":"101","author":"DL Reich","year":"2005","unstructured":"Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, Baez B, Patel P, Bernstein A, Bodian CA. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):622\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1213\/01.ANE.0000175214.38450.91.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"1","key":"717_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aex127","volume":"119","author":"S S\u00fcdfeld","year":"2017","unstructured":"S\u00fcdfeld S, Brechnitz S, Wagner JY, Reese PC, Pinnschmidt HO, Reuter DA, Saugel B. Post-induction hypotension and early intraoperative hypotension associated with general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(1):57\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aex127.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"5","key":"717_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-018-2532-6","volume":"32","author":"O Jor","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jor O, Maca J, Koutna J, Gemrotova M, Vymazal T, Litschmannova M, Sevcik P, Reimer P, Mikulova V, Trlicova M, Cerny V. Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia: occurrence, risk factors, and therapy. A prospective multicentre observational study. J Anesth. 2018;32(5):673\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00540-018-2532-6.","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"issue":"10","key":"717_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1177\/0885066615597198","volume":"31","author":"RS Green","year":"2016","unstructured":"Green RS, Butler MB. Postintubation hypotension in general anesthesia: a retrospective analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2016;31(10):667\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0885066615597198.","journal-title":"J Intensive Care Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"717_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e005850","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.117.005850","volume":"6","author":"Y Bohbot","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bohbot Y, Kowalski C, Rusinaru D, Ringle A, Marechaux S, Tribouilloy C. Impact of mean transaortic pressure gradient on long-term outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(6):e005850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.117.005850.","journal-title":"J Am Heart Assoc"},{"issue":"3","key":"717_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e011724","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.118.011724","volume":"8","author":"C Tribouilloy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tribouilloy C, Rusinaru D, Bohbot Y, Mar\u00e9chaux S, Vanoverschelde JL, Enriquez-Sarano M. How should very severe aortic stenosis be defined in asymptomatic individuals? J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(3):e011724. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.118.011724.","journal-title":"J Am Heart Assoc"},{"issue":"2","key":"717_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2016.01.105","volume":"102","author":"N Ad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ad N, Holmes SD, Patel J, Pritchard G, Shuman DJ, Halpin L. Comparison of EuroSCORE II, original EuroSCORE, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score in cardiac surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):573\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2016.01.105.","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg."},{"key":"717_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2021.03.027","volume":"149","author":"K Ishizu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ishizu K, Shirai S, Isotani A, Hayashi M, Kawaguchi T, Taniguchi T, Ando K, Yashima F, Tada N, Yamawaki M, Naganuma T, Yamanaka F, Ueno H, Tabata M, Mizutani K, Takagi K, Watanabe Y, Yamamoto M, Hayashida K. OCEAN-TAVI Investigators. Long-term prognostic value of the Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from the OCEAN-TAVI Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2021;149:86\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjcard.2021.03.027.","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"717_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110846","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2022.110846","volume":"80","author":"RB Schonberger","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schonberger RB, Dai F, Michel G, Vaughn MT, Burg MM, Mathis M, Kheterpal S, Akhtar S, Shah N, Bardia A. Association of propofol induction dose and severe pre-incision hypotension among surgical patients over age 65. J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110846. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinane.2022.110846.","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"717_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-020-02788-6","volume":"34","author":"M Doi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Doi M, Morita K, Takeda J, Sakamoto A, Yamakage M, Suzuki T. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb\/III trial. J Anesth. 2020;34(4):543\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00540-020-02788-6.","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"issue":"5","key":"717_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1017\/s026502150200056x","volume":"19","author":"W Wilhelm","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wilhelm W, Biedler A, Huppert A, Kreuer S, B\u00fccheler O, Ziegenfuss T, Larsen R. Comparison of the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol, thiopental or etomidate. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19(5):350\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s026502150200056x.","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"717_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.5681\/jcvtr.2013.011","volume":"5","author":"H Hosseinzadeh","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hosseinzadeh H, Eidy M, Golzari SE, Vasebi M. Hemodynamic stability during induction of anesthesia in elderly patients: propofol + ketamine versus propofol + etomidate. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013;5(2):51\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5681\/jcvtr.2013.011.","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Thorac Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"717_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annemergmed.2010.11.030","volume":"57","author":"SM Green","year":"2011","unstructured":"Green SM, Roback MG, Kennedy RM, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(5):449\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.annemergmed.2010.11.030.","journal-title":"Ann Emerg Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"717_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1982.tb01785.x","volume":"26","author":"T Stef\u00e1nsson","year":"1982","unstructured":"Stef\u00e1nsson T, Wickstr\u00f6m I, Haljam\u00e4e H. Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of ketamine anesthesia in the geriatric patient. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1982;26(4):371\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1982.tb01785.x.","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"}],"container-title":["JA Clinical Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40981-024-00717-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40981-024-00717-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40981-024-00717-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]],"date-time":"2024-05-24T04:04:35Z","timestamp":1716523475000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jaclinicalreports.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40981-024-00717-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["717"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40981-024-00717-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["2363-9024"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2363-9024","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 February 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 April 2024","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 May 2024","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 May 2024","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This single-center, retrospective observational study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan and publicized on our department homepage using an opt out approach that participants are included in the research unless they give their express decision to be excluded. The requirement for written informed consent from each patient was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study, and the Ethics Committee approved the waiver.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"We used an opt out approach. The requirement for written informed consent from each patient was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study, and the Ethics Committee approved the waiver.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"None.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conmpeting interests"}}],"article-number":"33"}}