{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,29]],"date-time":"2026-08-29T00:43:40Z","timestamp":1787964220059,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742860800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742860800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006356","name":"University of Southern Denmark","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006356","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Patient Rep Outcomes"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The integration of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) in cardiac rehabilitation practice has potential to enhance patient involvement and management. User acceptance is crucial for successful implementation of healthcare interventions, but limited literature addresses PROM acceptability among cardiovascular patients. This study explored the acceptability of a new national PROM in cardiac rehabilitation clinical practice for patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) in Denmark.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients who responded to the PROM were invited to complete two brief surveys evaluating perceived relevance, usefulness, and satisfaction. A purposefully selected subsample participated in semi structured interviews to gather in-depth experiences. A parallel convergent mixed-methods design was used with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability applied to structure and interpret findings.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>105 and 119 patients respectively responded to the two evaluation surveys (response-rates 56.5% and 53.4% respectively) and 25 patients were interviewed. The study showed a strong willingness to engage with PROMs, indicating a high overall acceptability. Most patients perceived the PROM helpful for preparation and enhancing communication during consultations. A minority of patients reported emotional reactions and experienced issues with questionnaire comprehensiveness, structure, and relevance.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The findings indicate that most IHD patients find PROM relevant and useful in cardiac rehabilitation. To enhance acceptability and, hence, future implementation, improvements are needed in clinical settings by providing adequate patient information, effectively using PRO results, and addressing patients\u2019 emotional reactions. Additionally, PROM development should focus on ensuring the questionnaire\u2019s relevance, comprehensiveness, and structure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-024-00831-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T22:34:56Z","timestamp":1742942096000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Patients\u2019 acceptability of a patient-reported outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation (the PRO-Heart-DK)\u2014a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Emma","family":"Dedic","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Heidi S\u00f8nderby","family":"Vistisen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ann-Dorthe","family":"Zwisler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bente Faurby","family":"Pedersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karin Lundsby","family":"Kappel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helle","family":"Kanstrup","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rikke Elmose","family":"Mols","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3527-0268","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cecilie Lindstr\u00f6m","family":"Egholm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"831_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1177\/2047487320913379","volume":"28","author":"M Ambrosetti","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corr\u00e0 U, Davos CH, Hansen D, Frederix I et al (2021) Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 28(5):460\u2013495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2047487320913379","journal-title":"Eur J Prev Cardiol"},{"key":"831_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l2191","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l2191","volume":"365","author":"CR Richardson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Richardson CR, Franklin B, Moy ML, Jackson EA (2019) Advances in rehabilitation for chronic diseases: improving health outcomes and function. BMJ 365:l2191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l2191","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"831_CR3","unstructured":"Dansk Cardiologisk Selskab. (2021) Behandlingsvejledning. 29. Hjerterehabilitering [Danish Society of Cardiology. Treatment guidlines. 29. Cardiac rehabilitation] https:\/\/nbv.cardio.dk\/hjerterehabilitering"},{"issue":"36","key":"831_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3405","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehad514","volume":"44","author":"P Moons","year":"2023","unstructured":"Moons P, Norekv\u00e5l TM, Arbelo E, Borregaard B, Casadei B, Cosyns B et al (2023) Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management: a statement of the ESC Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP), the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee, ESC Advocacy Committee, ESC Digital Health Committee, ESC Education Committee, and the ESC Patient Forum. Eur Heart J 44(36):3405\u20133422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehad514","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"831_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Health USDo, Human Services FDACfDE, Research Health USDo, Human Services FDACfBE, Research et al (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 4(1):79. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1477-7525-4-79","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-4-79"},{"issue":"9","key":"831_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1846","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdv181","volume":"26","author":"D Howell","year":"2015","unstructured":"Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K et al (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol 26(9):1846\u20131858. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/annonc\/mdv181","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-13-211","volume":"13","author":"J Chen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ (2013) A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res 13(1):211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6963-13-211","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"831_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2004.06.022","volume":"60","author":"J Greenhalgh","year":"2005","unstructured":"Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R (2005) The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med 60(4):833\u2013843. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2004.06.022","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"831_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gibbons C, Porter I, Gon\u00e7alves-Bradley DC, Stoilov S, Ricci-Cabello I, Tsangaris E et al (2021) Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10(10). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD011589.pub2","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011589.pub2"},{"issue":"4","key":"831_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0267030","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0267030","volume":"17","author":"L Carfora","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carfora L, Foley CM, Hagi-Diakou P, Lesty PJ, Sandstrom ML, Ramsey I et al (2022) Patients\u2019 experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS ONE 17(4):e0267030. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0267030","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"2","key":"831_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4","volume":"29","author":"C Graupner","year":"2021","unstructured":"Graupner C, Kimman ML, Mul S, Slok AHM, Claessens D, Kleijnen J et al (2021) Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 29(2):573\u2013593. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"831_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"f167","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f167","volume":"346","author":"N Black","year":"2013","unstructured":"Black N (2013) Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ: Br Med J 346:f167. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.f167","journal-title":"BMJ: Br Med J"},{"key":"831_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"k5267","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.k5267","volume":"364","author":"M Calvert","year":"2019","unstructured":"Calvert M, Kyte D, Price G, Valderas JM, Hjollund NH (2019) Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ 364:k5267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.k5267","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"831_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1177\/1474515116637980","volume":"15","author":"DR Thompson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Thompson DR, Ski CF, Garside J, Astin F (2016) A review of health-related quality of life patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular nursing. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 15(2):114\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1474515116637980","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs"},{"issue":"8","key":"831_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.12968\/bjca.2018.0039","volume":"14","author":"A Cowie","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cowie A, Hair M, Kerr E, McKay J, Allan L, Thomson P (2019) Validity and test-retest reliability of a patient-reported outcome measure for an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme. Br J Cardiac Nurs 14(8):1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12968\/bjca.2018.0039","journal-title":"Br J Cardiac Nurs"},{"key":"831_CR16","unstructured":"England N NHS England National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation (NACR). https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/"},{"key":"831_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"K\u00d6hn S, Schlumbohm A, Marquardt M, Scheel-Sailer A, Tobler S, Vontobel J et al (2022) Predicting non-response in patient-reported outcome measures: results from the Swiss quality assurance programme in cardiac inpatient rehabilitation. Int J Qual Health Care 34(4). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/intqhc\/mzac093","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzac093"},{"key":"831_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McNamara RL, Spatz ES, Kelley TA, Stowell CJ, Beltrame J, Heidenreich P et al (2015) Standardized outcome measurement for patients with coronary artery disease: Consensus from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). J Am Heart Assoc 4(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/jaha.115.001767","DOI":"10.1161\/jaha.115.001767"},{"key":"831_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2023.104755","volume":"130","author":"CL Egholm","year":"2023","unstructured":"Egholm CL, Jensen S, Wandel A, H\u00f8rder M (2023) The implementation of the 2017 national policy on patient-reported outcomes in Denmark: an overview of developments after six years. Health Policy 130:104755. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.healthpol.2023.104755","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"key":"831_CR20","unstructured":"PRO-Sekretariatet (2021) PRO-patient reported outcome. https:\/\/pro-danmark.dk\/da\/pro-english"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-06318-2","volume":"21","author":"TM Damush","year":"2021","unstructured":"Damush TM, Penney LS, Miech EJ, Rattray NA, Baird SA, Cheatham AJ et al (2021) Acceptability of a complex team-based quality improvement intervention for transient ischemic attack: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 21(1):453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-021-06318-2","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-4-50","volume":"4","author":"LJ Damschroder","year":"2009","unstructured":"Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC (2009) Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 4(1):50. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1748-5908-4-50","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-021-01171-7","volume":"17","author":"M Klaic","year":"2022","unstructured":"Klaic M, Kapp S, Hudson P, Chapman W, Denehy L, Story D et al (2022) Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework. Implement Sci 17(1):10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13012-021-01171-7","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2031-8","volume":"17","author":"M Sekhon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ (2017) Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1):88. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-017-2031-8","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"7262","key":"831_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.321.7262.694","volume":"321","author":"M Campbell","year":"2000","unstructured":"Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D et al (2000) Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 321(7262):694\u2013696. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.321.7262.694","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1136\/hrt.2004.052787","volume":"92","author":"B Schweikert","year":"2006","unstructured":"Schweikert B, Hahmann H, Leidl R (2006) Validation of the EuroQol questionnaire in cardiac rehabilitation. Heart 92(1):62\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/hrt.2004.052787","journal-title":"Heart"},{"issue":"4","key":"831_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjspcare-2017-001355","volume":"7","author":"PM Kane","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kane PM, Daveson BA, Ryan K, Ellis-Smith CI, Mahon NG, McAdam B et al (2017) Feasibility and acceptability of a patient-reported outcome intervention in chronic heart failure. BMJ Supportive Palliat Care 7(4):470\u2013479. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjspcare-2017-001355","journal-title":"BMJ Supportive Palliat Care"},{"issue":"8","key":"831_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e51","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31824642fd","volume":"51","author":"W Zhang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zhang W, Creswell J (2013) The Use of Mixing Procedure of Mixed Methods in Health Services Research. Med Care 51(8):e51\u2013e57. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31824642fd","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"6","key":"831_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","volume":"19","author":"A Tong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6):349\u2013357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"issue":"9","key":"831_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e28391","DOI":"10.2196\/28391","volume":"10","author":"SE Skovlund","year":"2021","unstructured":"Skovlund SE, Nicolucci A, Balk-M\u00f8ller N, Berthelsen DB, Gl\u00fcmer C, Perrild H et al (2021) Perceived benefits, barriers, and facilitators of a Digital patient-reported outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: protocol for a National, Multicenter, mixed methods implementation study. JMIR Res Protoc 10(9):e28391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/28391","journal-title":"JMIR Res Protoc"},{"issue":"15","key":"831_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3552","DOI":"10.1200\/jco.2005.04.275","volume":"23","author":"E Basch","year":"2005","unstructured":"Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, Scher K, Sabbatini P, Hensley M et al (2005) Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3552\u20133561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/jco.2005.04.275","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"831_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","volume":"3","author":"V Braun","year":"2006","unstructured":"Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol 3(2):77\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","journal-title":"Qualitative Res Psychol"},{"issue":"5 Pt 2","key":"831_CR33","first-page":"1189","volume":"34","author":"MQ Patton","year":"1999","unstructured":"Patton MQ (1999) Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 34(5 Pt 2):1189\u20131208","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"831_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-021-02950-x","author":"MM van Muilekom","year":"2021","unstructured":"van Muilekom MM, Teela L, van Oers HA, van Goudoever JB, Grootenhuis MA, Haverman L (2021) Patients\u2019 and parents\u2019 perspective on the implementation of patient reported outcome measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal. Qual Life Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-021-02950-x","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0061-6","volume":"2","author":"J Greenhalgh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, Dalkin S, Wright J, Valderas J et al (2018) How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient-Reported Outcomes 2(1):42. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-018-0061-6","journal-title":"J Patient-Reported Outcomes"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0067-0","volume":"2","author":"CT Mejdahl","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mejdahl CT, Schougaard LMV, Hjollund NH, Riiskj\u00e6r E, Thorne S, Lomborg K (2018) PRO-based follow-up as a means of self-management support \u2013 an interpretive description of the patient perspective. J Patient-Reported Outcomes 2(1):38. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-018-0067-0","journal-title":"J Patient-Reported Outcomes"},{"key":"831_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thestrup Hansen S, Kjerholt M, Friis Christensen S, Brodersen J, H\u00f8lge-Hazelton B (2020) \u201cI Am Sure That They Use My PROM Data for Something Important.\u201d A qualitative study about patients\u2019 experiences from a hematologic outpatient clinic. Cancer Nurs 43(5):E273\u2013e282. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ncc.0000000000000738.","DOI":"10.1097\/ncc.0000000000000738"},{"issue":"5","key":"831_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e313","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004846","volume":"129","author":"L Rosman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rosman L, Cahill JM, McCammon SL, Sears SF (2014) Sexual health concerns in patients with cardiovascular disease. Circulation 129(5):e313\u2013e316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004846","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"831_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Willik EMvd, Milders J, Bart JAJ, Bos WJW, Ittersum FJv, Dam MAGJt et al. (2022) Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 12(11):e067044. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-067044","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-067044"},{"issue":"4","key":"831_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.2174\/1574887117666220630114054","volume":"17","author":"D Pugliese","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pugliese D, Parisio L, Schepis T, Privitera G, Calvez V, Gasbarrini A et al (2022) Patient-reported outcomes for the Assessment of sexual health among patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease. Rev Recent Clin Trials 17(4):250\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1574887117666220630114054","journal-title":"Rev Recent Clin Trials"},{"issue":"8","key":"831_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2011.06.003","volume":"14","author":"S Rolstad","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rolstad S, Adler J, Ryd\u00e9n A (2011) Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and Meta-analysis. Value Health 14(8):1101\u20131108. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2011.06.003","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"831_CR42","unstructured":"Sundhedsdatastyrelsen (2021) Pilotevalueringsrapport vedr. PRO for hjerterehabilitering. Erfaringer fra pilotafpr\u00f8vningen af national PRO Hjerte i kommuner og p\u00e5 hospitaler. (p. 55)"},{"issue":"4","key":"831_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"929","DOI":"10.1185\/03007990902774765","volume":"25","author":"DE Stull","year":"2009","unstructured":"Stull DE, Leidy NK, Parasuraman B, Chassany O (2009) Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin 25(4):929\u2013942. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1185\/03007990902774765","journal-title":"Curr Med Res Opin"},{"issue":"4","key":"831_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1177\/1558689807306132","volume":"1","author":"JW Creswell","year":"2007","unstructured":"Creswell JW, Tashakkori A (2007) Editorial: differing perspectives on mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res 1(4):303\u2013308. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1558689807306132","journal-title":"J Mixed Methods Res"},{"key":"831_CR45","unstructured":"Morse JM (2003) Principles of mixed methods. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research 189"},{"issue":"1","key":"831_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-4-18","volume":"4","author":"MP Eccles","year":"2009","unstructured":"Eccles MP, Armstrong D, Baker R, Cleary K, Davies H, Davies S et al (2009) An implementation research agenda. Implement Sci 4(1):18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1748-5908-4-18","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"key":"831_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2016.08.120","volume":"223","author":"A Ruano-Ravina","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ruano-Ravina A, Pena-Gil C, Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras S, van \u2018t Hof A, Meindersma E et al (2016) Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review. Int J Cardiol 223:436\u2013443. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijcard.2016.08.120","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"831_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1093\/eurpub\/ckn060","volume":"18","author":"KM Nielsen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nielsen KM, Faergeman O, Foldspang A, Larsen ML (2008) Cardiac rehabilitation: health characteristics and socio-economic status among those who do not attend. Eur J Public Health 18(5):479\u2013483. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurpub\/ckn060","journal-title":"Eur J Public Health"},{"key":"831_CR49","unstructured":"Regionernes Kliniske K (2021) The Danish Cardiac rehabilitation database. Annual report 2020. [Dansk Hjerterehabiliteringsdatabase (DHRD). \u00c5rsrapport 2020.]. https:\/\/faelleskommunalsundhed.dk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/DHRD_aarsrapport2020_final.pdf"},{"key":"831_CR50","unstructured":"Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc., pp 105\u2013117"},{"issue":"20","key":"831_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2191","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.281053","volume":"310","author":"WM Association","year":"2013","unstructured":"Association WM (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for Medical Research Involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20):2191\u20132194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2013.281053","journal-title":"JAMA"}],"container-title":["Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41687-024-00831-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s41687-024-00831-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41687-024-00831-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T22:35:04Z","timestamp":1742942104000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jpro.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s41687-024-00831-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["831"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-024-00831-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["2509-8020"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2509-8020","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 March 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The overall project (IMPRoveCARE) was approved by the Region of Southern Denmark data protection agency j.no. 19-45655 and assessed by The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark as not subject to notification (j.no 20192000-167). In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [\n                      \n                      ], informed written consent was acquired.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"ED, HSV, BFP, KLK, HK and CLE: No competing interests. REM and ADZ were members of the clinical coordination group (developers) of the PRO-Heart-DK.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"35"}}