{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T16:22:09Z","timestamp":1783095729048,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]],"date-time":"2026-01-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769472000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]],"date-time":"2026-02-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771372800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":22,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002839","name":"Charit\u00e9 - Universit\u00e4tsmedizin Berlin","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002839","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Patient Rep Outcomes"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) improve cancer care by enabling structured self-assessment of disease-related symptoms, overall functioning, and health-related quality of life. Despite proven benefits, routine use is still limited, in part due to suboptimal data visualization.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methodology<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In a sub-study of the multicenter PRO B trial (52 centers, 924 patients with metastatic breast cancer), an interdisciplinary team of clinicians, researchers, patient representatives, and service designers co-developed user-centered PRO visualizations. Drawing on a literature review, an analysis of existing tools, and iterative mock-up development, the team generated initial design concepts. These concepts were then evaluated in semi-structured interviews with eight patients and five providers to assess clarity, emotional impact, usability, and potential for implementation. The interview data were analyzed thematically using a mixed deductive-inductive approach.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eight key themes emerged: axis labeling, color schemes, background lines, alert representation, reference data, missing data, format\/additional information, and practical application. Preferences included clear labels, consistent directionality, and simple alert markers. Color views diverged: traffic-light schemes were intuitive to some, but evoked negative reactions; blue gradients were perceived as neutral. Reference data aided context for some but discouraged others, supporting optional display. Missing values required consistent marking. Patients preferred access via both paper and customizable digital tools.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Co-designed, user-centered visualizations enhance PRO interpretability, emotional acceptability, and clinical utility. Implementing these recommendations can strengthen communication, support shared decision-making, and promote patient-centered cancer care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-026-01008-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]],"date-time":"2026-01-27T09:22:01Z","timestamp":1769505721000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["From participatory design to clinical routine: new concepts for visualizing patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer care"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9539-6164","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lea","family":"Doppelbauer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7587-7550","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Margarete","family":"Karsten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Tatzber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8795-6205","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Laura","family":"Hatzler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5946-7137","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pimrapat","family":"Gebert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jasper","family":"Brands","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosanne","family":"Andriessen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9942-4182","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Therese","family":"Pross","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"1008_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-007-9295-0","volume":"17","author":"JM Valderas","year":"2008","unstructured":"Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY et al (2008) The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 17(2):179\u2013193","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"1008_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2015.63.0830","volume":"34","author":"E Basch","year":"2016","unstructured":"Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P et al (2016) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34(6):557\u2013565","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1008_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.18085","volume":"321","author":"F Denis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Denis F, Basch E, Septans AL, Bennouna J, Urban T, Dueck AC et al (2019) Two-year survival comparing Web-based symptom monitoring vs routine surveillance following treatment for lung cancer. JAMA 321(3):306\u2013307","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"8","key":"1008_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.879","volume":"309","author":"M Calvert","year":"2013","unstructured":"Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, Revicki DA, Moher D, Brundage MD et al (2013) Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA 309(8):814\u2013822","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"7","key":"1008_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.20.02015","volume":"39","author":"K Absolom","year":"2021","unstructured":"Absolom K, Warrington L, Hudson E, Hewison J, Morris C, Holch P et al (2021) Phase III randomized controlled trial of eRAPID: eHealth intervention during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 39(7):734\u2013747","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"1008_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0072-3","volume":"2","author":"A Foster","year":"2018","unstructured":"Foster A, Croot L, Brazier J, Harris J, O\u2019Cathain A (2018) The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2:46","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"1","key":"1008_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-06457-6","volume":"21","author":"C Breidenbach","year":"2021","unstructured":"Breidenbach C, Kowalski C, Wesselmann S, Sibert NT (2021) Could existing infrastructure for using patient-reported outcomes as quality measures also be used for individual care in patients with colorectal cancer? BMC Health Serv Res 21(1):448","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"1008_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11373","DOI":"10.2196\/11373","volume":"4","author":"MM Karsten","year":"2018","unstructured":"Karsten MM, Speiser D, Hartmann C, Zeuschner N, Lippold K, Kiver V et al (2018) Web-based patient-reported outcomes using the International consortium for health outcome measurement dataset in a major German University Hospital: observational study. JMIR Cancer 4(2):e11373","journal-title":"JMIR Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"1008_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2009.23.9111","volume":"28","author":"AG McNair","year":"2010","unstructured":"McNair AG, Brookes ST, Davis CR, Argyropoulos M, Blazeby JM (2010) Communicating the results of randomized clinical trials: do patients understand multidimensional patient-reported outcomes? J Clin Oncol 28(5):738\u2013743","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"1008_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2457","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-015-0974-y","volume":"24","author":"MD Brundage","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brundage MD, Smith KC, Little EA, Bantug ET, Snyder CF, Prodpsa B (2015) Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed-methods evaluation. Qual Life Res 24(10):2457\u20132472","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1008_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-022-00424-3","volume":"6","author":"EAC Albers","year":"2022","unstructured":"Albers EAC, Fraterman I, Walraven I, Wilthagen E, Schagen SB, van der Ploeg IM et al (2022) Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy. J Patient Rep Outcomes 6(1):18","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"1008_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S10","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-13-S2-S10","volume":"13","author":"KJ McCaffery","year":"2013","unstructured":"McCaffery KJ, Holmes-Rovner M, Smith SK, Rovner D, Nutbeam D, Clayman ML et al (2013) Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak 13(Suppl 2):S10","journal-title":"BMC Med Inf Decis Mak"},{"key":"1008_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2458-12-80","volume":"12","author":"K Sorensen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z et al (2012) Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 12:80","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"1008_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2005.05.004","volume":"61","author":"PS Houts","year":"2006","unstructured":"Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ (2006) The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 61(2):173\u2013190","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"3","key":"1008_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocw169","volume":"24","author":"BJ Zikmund-Fisher","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Scherer AM, Witteman HO, Solomon JB, Exe NL, Tarini BA et al (2017) Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results. J Am Med Inf Assoc 24(3):520\u2013528","journal-title":"J Am Med Inf Assoc"},{"issue":"4","key":"1008_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720817690634","volume":"59","author":"R Garcia-Retamero","year":"2017","unstructured":"Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET (2017) Designing visual aids that promote risk literacy: a systematic review of health research and evidence-based design heuristics. Hum Factors 59(4):582\u2013627","journal-title":"Hum Factors"},{"key":"1008_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511816819.004","volume-title":"The Cambridge Handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge handbooks in psychology","author":"RE Mayer","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mayer RE (2005) Cognitive theory of Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer R (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge handbooks in psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 31\u201348"},{"issue":"3","key":"1008_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1177\/15291006211051956","volume":"22","author":"SL Franconeri","year":"2021","unstructured":"Franconeri SL, Padilla LM, Shah P, Zacks JM, Hullman J (2021) The science of visual data communication: what works. Psychol Sci Public Interest 22(3):110\u2013161","journal-title":"Psychol Sci Public Interest"},{"issue":"2","key":"1008_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216313491619","volume":"28","author":"B Antunes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson IJ, Euroimpact (2014) Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med 28(2):158\u2013175","journal-title":"Palliat Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"1008_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2015.10.027","volume":"99","author":"ET Bantug","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bantug ET, Coles T, Smith KC, Snyder CF, Rouette J, Brundage MD et al (2016) Graphical displays of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for use in clinical practice: what makes a pro picture worth a thousand words? Patient Educ Couns 99(4):483\u2013490","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"1008_CR21","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Pr\u00e4vention und Gesundheitsf\u00f6rderung. Springer Reference Pflege - Therapie - Gesundheit","author":"LJ Debbeler","year":"2020","unstructured":"Debbeler LJ, Wahl DR, Villinger K, Renner B (2020) Die Bedeutung der Gesundheitskommunikation in der Pr\u00e4vention und Gesundheitsf\u00f6rderung. In: Tiemann M, Mohokum M (eds) Pr\u00e4vention und Gesundheitsf\u00f6rderung. Springer Reference Pflege - Therapie - Gesundheit. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1\u201311"},{"issue":"1","key":"1008_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-021-05642-6","volume":"22","author":"MM Karsten","year":"2021","unstructured":"Karsten MM, Kuhn F, Pross T, Blohmer JU, Hage AM, Fischer F et al (2021) PRO B: evaluating the effect of an alarm-based patient-reported outcome monitoring compared with usual care in metastatic breast cancer patients-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 22(1):666","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"1008_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gebert P, Karsten MM, Hage AM, Dordevic AD, Grittner U (2024) Statistical analysis plan for the PRO B study: open-label, superiority randomised controlled trial of alarm-based patient-reported outcome monitoring in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Trials 25(1)","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-024-08025-9"},{"key":"1008_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-00749-2_6","volume-title":"Service design and service thinking in healthcare and hospital management","author":"LA Clack","year":"2019","unstructured":"Clack LA, Ellison RL (2019) Innovation in Service design Thinking. In: Pfannstiel MA, Rasche C (eds) Service design and service thinking in healthcare and hospital management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 85\u201392"},{"key":"1008_CR25","volume-title":"This is Service design doing: applying Service design Thinking in the real world: a Practitioner\u2019s Handbook","author":"M Stickdorn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stickdorn M, Lawrence A, Hormess M, Schneider J, ORfH E (2017) This is service design doing: applying service design thinking in the real world: a practitioner\u2019s handbook. O\u2019Reilly Media"},{"key":"1008_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781446288719","volume-title":"Qualitative text analysis: a guide to methods, practice & using software","author":"U Kuckartz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kuckartz U (2014) Qualitative text analysis: a guide to methods, practice & using software. SAGE"},{"issue":"1","key":"1008_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-020-0173-7","volume":"4","author":"KI Fischer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fischer KI, De Faoite D, Rose M (2020) Patient-reported outcomes feedback report for knee arthroplasty patients should present selective information in a simple design - findings of a qualitative study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 4(1):6","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"3","key":"1008_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2014.11.071","volume":"136","author":"A Gilbert","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gilbert A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Davidson S, Velikova G (2015) Use of patient-reported outcomes to measure symptoms and health related quality of life in the clinic. Gynecol Oncol 136(3):429\u2013439","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"1008_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1848","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.30530","volume":"123","author":"CF Snyder","year":"2017","unstructured":"Snyder CF, Smith KC, Bantug ET, Tolbert EE, Blackford AL, Brundage MD et al (2017) What do these scores mean? Presenting patient-reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretability. Cancer 123(10):1848\u20131859","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"10","key":"1008_CR30","first-page":"4149","volume":"24","author":"KC Smith","year":"2016","unstructured":"Smith KC, Brundage MD, Tolbert E, Little EA, Bantug ET, Snyder CF et al (2016) Engaging stakeholders to improve presentation of patient-reported outcomes data in clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 24(10):4149\u20134157","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"1008_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-2020-3","volume":"28","author":"C Snyder","year":"2019","unstructured":"Snyder C, Smith K, Holzner B, Rivera YM, Bantug E, Brundage M et al (2019) Making a picture worth a thousand numbers: recommendations for graphically displaying patient-reported outcomes data. Qual Life Res 28(2):345\u2013356","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"1008_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X18791177","volume":"38","author":"E Tolbert","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tolbert E, Brundage M, Bantug E, Blackford AL, Smith K, Snyder C et al (2018) Picture this: presenting longitudinal patient-reported outcome research study results to patients. Med Decis Mak 38(8):994\u20131005","journal-title":"Med Decis Mak"},{"issue":"1","key":"1008_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocv101","volume":"23","author":"AL Hartzler","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hartzler AL, Izard JP, Dalkin BL, Mikles SP, Gore JL (2016) Design and feasibility of integrating personalized PRO dashboards into prostate cancer care. J Am Med Inf Assoc 23(1):38\u201347","journal-title":"J Am Med Inf Assoc"},{"issue":"4","key":"1008_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732316665344","volume":"27","author":"MM Hennink","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC (2017) Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res 27(4):591\u2013608","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"1008_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1893","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-017-0574-8","volume":"52","author":"B Saunders","year":"2018","unstructured":"Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B et al (2018) Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 52(4):1893\u20131907","journal-title":"Qual Quant"},{"issue":"6","key":"1008_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","volume":"19","author":"A Tong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6):349\u2013357","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"}],"container-title":["Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01008-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01008-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01008-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T17:11:52Z","timestamp":1781629912000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01008-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1008"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01008-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["2509-8020"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2509-8020","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 September 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Ethics Committee of Charit\u00e9 - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin on January, 11th 2021 (EA1\/318\/20) and June, 5th 2023 (EA2\/070\/23). The study has been registered as DRKS00024015.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Written informed consent for study participation and data publication was obtained from all participants prior to the start of the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"28"}}