{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T17:47:04Z","timestamp":1792000024517,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784073600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791849600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":90,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000724","name":"Health Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["AIMS ID 565090"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AIMS ID 565090"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000724","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000724","name":"Health Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["AIMS ID 565090"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AIMS ID 565090"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000724","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000724","name":"Health Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["AIMS ID 565090"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AIMS ID 565090"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000724","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000724","name":"Health Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["AIMS ID 565090"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AIMS ID 565090"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000724","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000724","name":"Health Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["AIMS ID 565090"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AIMS ID 565090"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000724","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000724","name":"Health Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["AIMS ID 565090"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AIMS ID 565090"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000724","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Patient Rep Outcomes"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Large-scale ePRO systems inherently need to cross organisational boundaries to meet their full potential for improving care and outcomes. Doing this successfully requires involving all stakeholders. However, previous research in kidney disease and other conditions mainly focused on individual patients and healthcare professionals, leaving wider stakeholders\u2019 perspectives on how to implement cross-organisational ePRO systems unknown.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methodology<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with key informants from national stakeholder organisations involved in delivering, commissioning, evaluating, or improving hospital-based kidney services in the United Kingdom. Interviews explored participants\u2019 views on kidney ePRO systems, including their perceived value, implementation challenges, and factors influencing uptake in routine kidney care. We applied the i-PARIHS implementation science framework to thematically analyse the data.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Participants reported limited awareness of kidney ePROs and their potential benefits within their communities. Acknowledging constrained resources and competing priorities within the healthcare system, stakeholders suggested harnessing existing regional service improvement networks to support ePRO system implementation into kidney care pathways. They emphasised the need for coordinated efforts among national stakeholder organisations to drive and support local implementation. They also identified high quality evidence of ePROs\u2019 clinical utility and positive impact on kidney care and outcomes as a requirement for successful large-scale implementation, highlighting different types of impact as primarily relevant. Anecdotal evidence of ePRO benefits and real-world evidence of feasibility from local pilots were mentioned as complementary sources of knowledge to strengthen the case for cross-organisational ePRO system implementation in kidney care settings.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Successfully implementing cross-organisational ePRO systems in kidney services requires stakeholders to be better informed about ePROs\u2019 potential value, supported by robust and real-world evidence derived from studies in kidney disease. In a healthcare system under pressure, leveraging existing regional service improvement initiatives and coordinated leadership from a national cross-stakeholder group were considered key drivers of implementation success. Future research should strengthen the evidence base for kidney ePRO systems\u2019 effectiveness and implementation, while also exploring available health IT infrastructure. This will shape implementation strategies that enable healthcare systems to fully realise the potential of ePROs to improve kidney services and outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-026-01137-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T05:25:16Z","timestamp":1784093116000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Wider stakeholders\u2019 perspectives on successfully implementing electronic patient-reported outcome systems across organisations: a qualitative study in kidney care"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Sabine N.","family":"van der Veer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angelo","family":"Ercia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fergus J.","family":"Caskey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ken","family":"Farrington","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Rees","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Knowles","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"1137_CR1","unstructured":"NHS England Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (2024 Aug). https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/data-and-information\/data-tools-and-services\/data-services\/patient-reported-outcome-measures-proms"},{"key":"1137_CR2","unstructured":"Canadian Institute for Health Information Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) (2024 Aug). https:\/\/www.cihi.ca\/en\/patient-reported-outcome-measures-proms"},{"key":"1137_CR3","unstructured":"Australian commission on safety and quality in health care Patient-reported outcome measures (2024 Aug). https:\/\/www.safetyandquality.gov.au\/our-work\/indicators-measurement-and-reporting\/patient-reported-outcome-measures"},{"key":"1137_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2023.104755","volume":"130","author":"CL Egholm","year":"2023","unstructured":"Egholm CL, Jensen S, Wandel A, Horder M (2023) The implementation of the 2017 national policy on patient-reported outcomes in Denmark: An overview of developments after six years. Health Policy 130:104755. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.healthpol.2023.104755","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"issue":"6","key":"1137_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1495","DOI":"10.1093\/ckj\/sfab061","volume":"14","author":"SN van der Veer","year":"2021","unstructured":"van der Veer SN, Couchoud C, Morton RL (2021) The role of kidney registries in expediting large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures for people with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J Jun 14(6):1495\u20131503. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ckj\/sfab061","journal-title":"Clin Kidney J Jun"},{"key":"1137_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"k5267","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.k5267","volume":"364","author":"M Calvert","year":"2019","unstructured":"Calvert M, Kyte D, Price G, Valderas JM, Hjollund NH (2019) Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ 364:k5267\u2013k5267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.k5267","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"1137_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-018-2898-z","volume":"18","author":"B Prodinger","year":"2018","unstructured":"Prodinger B, Taylor P (2018) Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples. BMC Health Serv Res 18:87. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-018-2898-z","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"1137_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e225","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(24)00223-1","volume":"7","author":"C Marra","year":"2025","unstructured":"Marra C, Chico T, Alexandrow A et al (2025) Addressing the challenges of integrating digital health technologies to measure patient-centred outcomes in clinical registries. Lancet Digit Health Mar 7(3):e225\u2013e231. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2589-7500(24)00223-1","journal-title":"Lancet Digit Health Mar"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"1137_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151552","DOI":"10.1016\/j.semnephrol.2024.151552","volume":"44","author":"SN van der Veer","year":"2024","unstructured":"van der Veer SN, Anderson NE, Finnigan R, Kyte D (2024) Electronic Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve Kidney Care: Benefits, Drawbacks, and Next Steps. Semin Nephrol 44(3\u20134):151552. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.semnephrol.2024.151552","journal-title":"Semin Nephrol"},{"key":"1137_CR10","unstructured":"UK Kidney Association UK Renal Data Collaboration (UKRDC). 9-Apr-2025, https:\/\/www.ukkidney.org\/audit-research\/data-permissions\/ukrdc"},{"key":"1137_CR11","unstructured":"Patients Know Best The UKKA working with PKB. 4-Jun-2024. https:\/\/patientsknowbest.com\/renal\/"},{"key":"1137_CR12","unstructured":"UK Kidney Association UK Renal Registry. 4-Jun-2024, Accessed 4-Jun-2024. https:\/\/ukkidney.org\/about-us\/who-we-are\/uk-renal-registry"},{"key":"1137_CR13","unstructured":"UK Kidney Association Kidney Patient Reported Experience Measure. 9-Apr-2026, https:\/\/www.ukkidney.org\/kidney-patient-reported-experience-measure"},{"issue":"7","key":"1137_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e070927","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-070927","volume":"12","author":"NE Anderson","year":"2023","unstructured":"Anderson NE, Kyte D, McMullan C et al (2023) Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. Jul 12(7):e070927. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-070927","journal-title":"BMJ Open Jul"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e10875","DOI":"10.2196\/10875","volume":"24","author":"L Warrington","year":"2019","unstructured":"Warrington L, Absolom K, Conner M et al (2019) Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res Jan 24(1):e10875. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/10875","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res Jan"},{"key":"1137_CR16","first-page":"936","volume":"270","author":"SN van der Veer","year":"2020","unstructured":"van der Veer SN, Ercia A, Caskey FJ et al (2020) Developing an intervention to implement electronic patient - reported outcomes in renal services in the UK. Stud Health Technol Inform 270:936\u2013940","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"key":"1137_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e050610","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-050610","volume":"12","author":"D Kyte","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kyte D, Anderson N, Bishop J et al (2022) Results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial exploring the use of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure in the management of UK patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. BMJ Open 12:e050610\u2013e050610. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-050610","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1093\/QJMED\/HCX180","volume":"111","author":"A Nimmo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nimmo A, Bell S, Brunton C et al (2018) Collection and determinants of patient reported outcome measures in haemodialysis patients in Scotland. QJM: Int J Med 111(1):15\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/QJMED\/HCX180","journal-title":"QJM: Int J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR19","first-page":"10","volume":"24","author":"RM Gair","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gair RM, Stannard C, van der Veer SN, Farrington K, Fluck R (2019) Transforming participation in chronic kidney disease: is it possible to embed patient-reported outcome measures to make a difference to care and the perception of care? Br J Ren Med 24(1):10\u201313","journal-title":"Br J Ren Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"1137_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0290976","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0290976","volume":"18","author":"M Silveira Bianchim","year":"2023","unstructured":"Silveira Bianchim M, Crane E, Jones A et al (2023) The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 18(12):e0290976. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0290976","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-022-01245-0","volume":"29","author":"LJ Damschroder","year":"2022","unstructured":"Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J (2022) The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci Oct 29(1):75. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13012-022-01245-0","journal-title":"Implement Sci Oct"},{"key":"1137_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-016-0398-2","volume":"11","author":"G Harvey","year":"2016","unstructured":"Harvey G, Kitson A (2016) PARIHS revisited: From heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci 11:33\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13012-016-0398-2","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"issue":"11","key":"1137_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e367","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.8775","volume":"19","author":"T Greenhalgh","year":"2017","unstructured":"Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C et al (2017) Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorising and evaluating Non-adoption, Abandonment and challenges to Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 19(11):e367\u2013e367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/jmir.8775","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-023-00554-2","volume":"7","author":"BG Glenwright","year":"2023","unstructured":"Glenwright BG, Simmich J, Cottrell M et al (2023) Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 7(1):13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-023-00554-2","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"9","key":"1137_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2022.04.1724","volume":"25","author":"SK Ernst","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ernst SK, Steinbeck V, Busse R, Pross C (2022) Toward System-Wide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Framework for Countries, States, and Regions. Value Health Sep 25(9):1539\u20131547. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2022.04.1724","journal-title":"Value Health Sep"},{"issue":"6","key":"1137_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocy006","volume":"25","author":"MJ Reading","year":"2018","unstructured":"Reading MJ, Merrill JA (2018) Converging and diverging needs between patients and providers who are collecting and using patient-generated health data: an integrative review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 25(6):759\u2013771. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jamia\/ocy006","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"key":"1137_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e052629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-052629","volume":"11","author":"NE Anderson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Anderson NE, McMullan C, Calvert M et al (2021) Using patient-reported outcome measures during the management of patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis (PROM-HD): a qualitative study. BMJ open 11:e052629\u2013e052629. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-052629","journal-title":"BMJ open"},{"key":"1137_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-06702-y","volume":"21","author":"S Knowles","year":"2021","unstructured":"Knowles S, Ercia A, Caskey FJ, Farrington K, Rees M, van der Veer SN (2021) Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory to understand how patients and professionals can implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services. BMC Health Serv Res 21:706. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-021-06702-y","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"1137_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4149","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-016-3240-0","volume":"24","author":"KC Smith","year":"2016","unstructured":"Smith KC, Brundage MD, Tolbert E et al (2016) Engaging stakeholders to improve presentation of patient-reported outcomes data in clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 24:4149\u20134157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-016-3240-0","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"1137_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.3122\/jabfm.2016.01.150141","volume":"29","author":"BM Kwan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kwan BM, Sills MR, Graham D et al (2016) Stakeholder Engagement in a Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measure Implementation: A Report from the SAFTINet Practice-based Research Network (PBRN). J Am Board Family Med 29:102\u2013115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3122\/jabfm.2016.01.150141","journal-title":"J Am Board Family Med"},{"key":"1137_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3015","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-020-02564-9","volume":"30","author":"AM Stover","year":"2020","unstructured":"Stover AM, Haverman L, van Oers HA et al (2020) Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Qual Life Res 30:3015\u20133033. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-020-02564-9","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"1137_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e006986","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-006986","volume":"5","author":"C Hunter","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hunter C, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C et al (2015) Perspectives from health, social care and policy stakeholders on the value of a single self-report outcome measure across long-term conditions: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 5:e006986. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-006986","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"10","key":"1137_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.1640","volume":"151","author":"ML Pezold","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pezold ML, Pusic AL, Cohen WA et al (2016) Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders. JAMA Surg 151(10):930\u2013936. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.1640","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"1137_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-020-00219-4","volume":"4","author":"S Cruz Rivera","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cruz Rivera S, McMullan C, Jones L, Kyte D, Slade A, Calvert M (2020) The impact of patient-reported outcome data from clinical trials: perspectives from international stakeholders. J Patient Rep Outcomes 4:51. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-020-00219-4","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"2","key":"1137_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2022.07.016","volume":"81","author":"LA Inker","year":"2023","unstructured":"Inker LA, Ferre S, Baliker M et al (2023) A National Registry for People With All Stages of Kidney Disease: The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Patient Network. Am J Kidney Dis Feb 81(2):210\u2013221e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.ajkd.2022.07.016","journal-title":"Am J Kidney Dis Feb"},{"issue":"14","key":"1137_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1177\/10497323231198796","volume":"33","author":"M Pahwa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pahwa M, Cavanagh A, Vanstone M (2023) Key Informants in Applied Qualitative Health Research. Qual Health Res 33(14):1251\u20131261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10497323231198796","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"1137_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","volume":"19","author":"A Tong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care Dec 19(6):349\u2013357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care Dec"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-020-01003-0","volume":"27","author":"A Bergstrom","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bergstrom A, Ehrenberg A, Eldh AC et al (2020) The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice-a citation analysis of the literature. Implement Sci Aug 27(1):68. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13012-020-01003-0","journal-title":"Implement Sci Aug"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-022-01254-z","volume":"7","author":"Y Duan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Duan Y, Iaconi A, Wang J et al (2022) Conceptual and relational advances of the PARIHS and i-PARIHS frameworks over the last decade: a critical interpretive synthesis. Implement Sci Dec 7(1):78. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13012-022-01254-z","journal-title":"Implement Sci Dec"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1559","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-024-11990-1","volume":"12","author":"L Arestedt","year":"2024","unstructured":"Arestedt L, Uhlin F, Eldh AC (2024) Facilitating person-centered patient participation in kidney care-a process evaluation of a quasi-experimental study incorporating a tool and training of local implementation teams. BMC Health Serv Res Dec 12(1):1559. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-024-11990-1","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res Dec"},{"issue":"11","key":"1137_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3063","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-020-02669-1","volume":"30","author":"NA Roberts","year":"2021","unstructured":"Roberts NA, Janda M, Stover AM et al (2021) The utility of the implementation science framework Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department. Qual Life Res Nov 30(11):3063\u20133071. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-020-02669-1","journal-title":"Qual Life Res Nov"},{"key":"1137_CR42","unstructured":"NHS England NHS Commissioning. Specialised services. Transform Clinical Reference Group (CRG) Renal Services (2026 Apr). https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/commissioning\/spec-services\/npc-crg\/group-a\/renal-services\/"},{"key":"1137_CR43","unstructured":"Parker C, Scott S, Geddes A (2019) Snowball sampling. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug JW, Williams RA, eds. SAGE research methods foundations"},{"key":"1137_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Van der Veer SN, Kyte D, Chadwick H, et al (2023) Putting patients at the centre: including patients\u2019 perspective into UK kidney care and research. A roadmap for collecting electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48420\/21916518","DOI":"10.48420\/21916518"},{"issue":"12","key":"1137_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"842","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-024-09026-9","volume":"2","author":"L Hang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hang L, Zhang J, Lu Z, Xu J, Chen Y (2024) Effectiveness of ePRO-based symptom management for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Support Care Cancer Dec 2(12):842. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-024-09026-9","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer Dec"},{"key":"1137_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104588","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2023.104588","volume":"147","author":"Y Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li Y, Li J, Hu X (2023) The effectiveness of symptom management interventions based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom burden, quality of life, and overall survival among patients with cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud Nov 147:104588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2023.104588","journal-title":"Int J Nurs Stud Nov"},{"key":"1137_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e63639","DOI":"10.2196\/63639","volume":"5","author":"M Sasseville","year":"2025","unstructured":"Sasseville M, Supper W, Gartner JB et al (2025) Electronic Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res May 5:27:e63639. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/63639","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res May"},{"issue":"13","key":"1137_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1753","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732315617444","volume":"26","author":"K Malterud","year":"2016","unstructured":"Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD (2016) Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qual Health Res Nov 26(13):1753\u20131760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1049732315617444","journal-title":"Qual Health Res Nov"},{"key":"1137_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-020-05355-7","volume":"20","author":"K Cresswell","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cresswell K, Sheikh A, Franklin BD et al (2020) Theoretical and methodological considerations in evaluating large-scale health information technology change programmes. BMC Health Serv Res 20:447\u2013447. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-020-05355-7","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"1137_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1197\/jamia.M3183","volume":"16","author":"E Coiera","year":"2009","unstructured":"Coiera E (2009) Building a National Health IT System from the middle out. J Am Med Inf Assoc May-Jun 16(3):271\u2013273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1197\/jamia.M3183","journal-title":"J Am Med Inf Assoc May-Jun"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"1137_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-021-00370-6","volume":"5","author":"M Terner","year":"2021","unstructured":"Terner M, Louie K, Chow C, Webster G (2021) Advancing PROMs for health system use in Canada and beyond. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5(Suppl 2):94. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-021-00370-6","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"1137_CR52","unstructured":"Crossnohere N, Brundage M, Snyder C (2024) The PROTEUS guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a synthesis of resources. Accessed 16-May-2024. https:\/\/theproteusconsortium.org\/"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2023.10.007","volume":"27","author":"FD Mowlem","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mowlem FD, Elash CA, Dumais KM et al (2024) Best Practices for the Electronic Implementation and Migration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Value Health 27(1):79\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2023.10.007","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"12","key":"1137_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1038\/s41581-022-00619-3","volume":"18","author":"N Anderson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Anderson N, Kyte D, McMullan C et al (2022) Electronic patient-reported outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol Dec 18(12):739\u2013740. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41581-022-00619-3","journal-title":"Nat Rev Nephrol Dec"},{"issue":"11","key":"1137_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1580","DOI":"10.2215\/CJN.10840922","volume":"17","author":"JE Flythe","year":"2022","unstructured":"Flythe JE (2022) Integrating PROMs in Routine Dialysis Care: The Devil Is in the (Implementation) Details. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Nov 17(11):1580\u20131582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2215\/CJN.10840922","journal-title":"Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Nov"},{"issue":"7","key":"1137_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"sfae176","DOI":"10.1093\/ckj\/sfae176","volume":"17","author":"BE Grove","year":"2024","unstructured":"Grove BE, Schougaard LMV, Mose F et al (2024) Remote symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcome measures in outpatients with chronic kidney disease (PROKID): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority study. Clin Kidney J Jul 17(7):sfae176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ckj\/sfae176","journal-title":"Clin Kidney J Jul"},{"key":"1137_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e039014","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-039014","volume":"10","author":"E Duncanson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Duncanson E, Bennett PN, Viecelli A et al (2020) Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia. BMJ open 10:e039014\u2013e039014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-039014","journal-title":"BMJ open"},{"issue":"1","key":"1137_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.2215\/CJN.04450512","volume":"8","author":"SD Weisbord","year":"2013","unstructured":"Weisbord SD, Mor MK, Green J et al (2013) Comparison of symptom management strategies for pain, erectile dysfunction, and depression in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis: A cluster randomized effectiveness trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8(1):90\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2215\/CJN.04450512","journal-title":"Clin J Am Soc Nephrol"},{"issue":"731","key":"1137_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-020-05557-z","volume":"20","author":"JA Johnson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Johnson JA, Al Sayah F, Buzinski R et al (2020) A cluster randomized controlled trial for the Evaluation of routinely Measured PATient reported outcomes in HemodialYsis care (EMPATHY): A study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 20(731):1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-020-05557-z","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"1137_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e3182408812","volume":"50","author":"GM Curran","year":"2012","unstructured":"Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C (2012) Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care Mar 50(3):217\u2013226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MLR.0b013e3182408812","journal-title":"Med Care Mar"},{"issue":"5","key":"1137_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1111\/jan.13494","volume":"74","author":"M Casey","year":"2018","unstructured":"Casey M, Coghlan DOL (2018) Unpacking action research and implementation science: Implications for nursing. J Adv Nurs May 74(5):1051\u20131058. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jan.13494","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs May"},{"issue":"4","key":"1137_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.14236\/jhi.v25i4.1068","volume":"25","author":"KM Cresswell","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cresswell KM, McKinstry B, Wolters M, Shah A, Sheikh A (2018) Five key strategic priorities of integrating patient generated health data into United Kingdom electronic health records. J Innov Health Inf 25(4):254\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14236\/jhi.v25i4.1068","journal-title":"J Innov Health Inf"}],"container-title":["Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01137-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01137-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01137-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T17:03:20Z","timestamp":1791997400000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01137-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1137"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-026-01137-7","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-7617025\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2509-8020"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2509-8020","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 September 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 July 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Research ethics was obtained from the UK Health Research Authority, North West-Greater Manchester (IRAS reference: 245870). All participants provided written informed consent to be involved in the study and for publication of anonymised quotations. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and participant consent","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"187"}}