{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T09:28:46Z","timestamp":1789118926465,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789084800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789084800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur Radiol Exp"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Maternal pelvic anatomical changes during the second stage of labor (SSL) remain poorly understood because of the difficulty in visualizing internal structures\n                      <jats:italic>in vivo<\/jats:italic>\n                      . Mechanical models have attempted to predict these changes but lack real-time confirmation. This proof-of-concept study assessed the feasibility of using open-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize maternal and fetal structural movements during the SSL.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Twenty-seven term pregnant women were recruited for an open-field MRI study at a single center. Each participant was scheduled for scans in a 1-T open magnet within 2\u2009h before labor onset and again during the SSL. Owing to logistical constraints, seven patients underwent both pre-labor and intrapartum MRI. Qualitative assessments of intrapartum pelvic anatomy changes were performed and supplemented by basic quantitative measurements of pelvic dimensions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Intrapartum MRI was successfully performed in seven women (aged 23\u201334 years). All showed marked perineal expansion and deformation of the pelvic floor during fetal descent. The iliococcygeal portion of the levator ani flattened and reversed its curvature under fetal head pressure, corresponding to the perineal bulge. Posterior coccygeal deflection occurred in all the patients (mean coccyx\u2013symphysis increase of\u2009~\u20090.8\u2009cm), along with vaginal canal distension. Six patients had a partially filled bladder, which was displaced cranially as the fetal head descended. No adverse events occurred during MRI acquisition.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Open-field MRI during the SSL is technically feasible and provides novel real-time observations of pelvic floor adaptations to fetal descent. These findings improve the understanding of intrapartum pelvic mechanics but require confirmation in larger cohorts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Relevance statement<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Open MRI offers a way to observe directly how maternal pelvic structures adapt during childbirth in real time. This feasibility study\u2019s insights are descriptive and hypothesis-generating, laying the groundwork for future research on protecting the pelvic floor during delivery rather than providing immediate clinical recommendations. By clarifying how maternal pelvic structures adapt to fetal descent, these MRI findings can inform strategies to minimize perineal trauma, guide interventions (\n                      <jats:italic>e.g<\/jats:italic>\n                      ., episiotomy, not emptying the bladder before maternal efforts), and ultimately improve maternal postpartum pelvic floor health.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Key Points<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:list list-type=\"bullet\">\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Changes in the maternal pelvis during the second stage of labor remain poorly understood.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Intrapartum open MRI can feasibly capture maternal pelvic anatomy in real time.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Fetal descent markedly deforms the maternal pelvic floor (muscles, ligaments, and organs).<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Crowning is associated with significant anal sphincter stretching on MRI.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                        <jats:list-item>\n                          <jats:p>Preliminary MRI observations may inform childbirth mechanics but are not yet generalizable.<\/jats:p>\n                        <\/jats:list-item>\n                      <\/jats:list>\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s41747-026-00757-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T09:01:41Z","timestamp":1789117301000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["MRI visualization of maternal pelvic and perineal anatomical changes during the second stage of labor: a feasibility study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9397-3482","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jean-Christophe","family":"Maran","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Olivier","family":"Ami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tien Tuan","family":"Dao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G\u00e9rard","family":"Mage","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Louis","family":"Boyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"757_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x","volume":"19","author":"D Sherer","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sherer D, Miodovnik M, Bradley K, Langer O (2002) Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:264\u2013268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12335","volume":"41","author":"A Youssef","year":"2013","unstructured":"Youssef A, Maroni E, Ragusa A (2013) Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41:419\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.12335","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1590\/SO100-720320150005308","volume":"37","author":"L Hinkson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hinkson L, Araujo Junior E, Moron A (2015) Ultrasound during the second stage of labour: is it effective to reduce the caesarean section rates? Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 37:249\u2013251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/SO100-720320150005308","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"},{"key":"757_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.939","volume":"23","author":"H Dietz","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dietz H (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:80\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.939","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1067\/s0002-9378(03)00835-4","volume":"189","author":"M Zaretsky","year":"2003","unstructured":"Zaretsky M, McIntire D, Twickler D (2003) Feasibility of the fetal anatomic and maternal pelvic survey by magnetic resonance imaging at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:997\u20131001. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/s0002-9378(03)00835-4","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"505.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.011","volume":"206","author":"C Bamberg","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bamberg C, Rademacher G, G\u00fcttler F et al (2012) Human birth observed in real-time open magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:505.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2020.02.007","volume":"62","author":"M Lum","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lum M, Tsiouris A (2020) MRI safety considerations during pregnancy. Clin Imaging 62:69\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2020.02.007","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"757_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1765","volume":"25","author":"HP Dietz","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dietz HP, Lanzarone V (2005) Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:165\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.1765","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.10.867","volume":"206","author":"C Bamberg","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Fotopoulou C (2012) Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:161.e1\u2013161.e5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.10.867","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR10","first-page":"975","volume":"4","author":"P Magnin","year":"1975","unstructured":"Magnin P, Bremond A, Salomon B et al (1975) [Diagram for the prognosis of cephalo-pelvic disproportions. Application in 300 cases of pelvic contraction]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 4:975\u2013987","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"757_CR11","first-page":"1","volume":"32","author":"W Caldwell","year":"1938","unstructured":"Caldwell W, Moloy H (1938) Anatomical variations in the female pelvis: their classification and obstetrical significance. Proc R Soc Med 32:1\u201330","journal-title":"Proc R Soc Med"},{"key":"757_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/S0033-8389(22)01989-3","volume":"5","author":"U Borell","year":"1967","unstructured":"Borell U, Fernstrom I (1967) The mechanism of labour. Radiol Clin North Am 5:73\u201385","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"key":"757_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.11.047","volume":"192","author":"L Benavides","year":"2005","unstructured":"Benavides L, Wu J, Hundley A (2005) The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1702\u20131706. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.11.047","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.005","volume":"218","author":"L Nandikanti","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nandikanti L, Sammarco A, Kobernik E, DeLancey J (2018) Levator ani defect severity and its association with enlarged hiatus size, levator bowl depth, and prolapse size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:537\u2013539. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"757_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.025","volume":"131","author":"A Ampt","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ampt A, Patterson J, Roberts C, Ford J (2015) Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 131:260\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.025","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"757_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hehir M, Rubeo Z, Flood K (2017) Anal sphincter injury in vaginal deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia. Int Urogynecol J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3351-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3351-2"},{"key":"757_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maran J-C, Cassagnes L, Delmas V et al (2018) Comparative anatomy on 3-D MRI of the urogenital sinus and the periurethral area before and during the second stage of labor during childbirth. Surg Radiol Anat 40:371\u2013380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00276-017-1925-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s00276-017-1925-9"},{"key":"757_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ami O, Maran JC, Gabor P et al (2019) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of fetal head molding and brain shape changes during the second stage of labor. PLoS One 14:e0215721. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0215721","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0215721"},{"key":"757_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ami O, Maran JC, Musset D et al (2022) Human birth imaging using MRI demonstrates fetal head moldability and brain compression: prospective cohort study. JMIR Form Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/27421","DOI":"10.2196\/27421"}],"container-title":["European Radiology Experimental"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41747-026-00757-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s41747-026-00757-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41747-026-00757-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T09:01:42Z","timestamp":1789117302000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s41747-026-00757-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["757"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41747-026-00757-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2509-9280"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2509-9280","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 April 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 May 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 September 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This prospective research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board \u201cComit\u00e9 de Protection des Personnes Ile de France II\u201d (#IDRCB2012A0146934) and by the French National Agency for Drug and Medical Product Safety (ANSM) and promoted by the University of Clermont-Ferrand Medical Center.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-5.1, accessed November 2025) was used for assistance with language editing and refinement of the manuscript. No part of the data analysis, results of generation, or scientific interpretation was performed using AI tools. All content was reviewed, corrected, and approved by the human authors, who take full responsibility for the final version.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Use of Large Language Models (LLMs)","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in Maran et al [\n                      \n                      ], Ami et al [\n                      \n                      ], and Ami et al [\n                      \n                      ].","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Study subjects or cohorts overlap","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"129"}}