{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T23:19:50Z","timestamp":1788391190272,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788393600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788393600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006390","name":"University of Lausanne","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006390","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arthroplasty"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Femoral notching in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is traditionally associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture in cases of excessive anterior resection. Beyond fracture risk, notching can influence implant fit, patellofemoral and tibiofemoral balance, joint stability, and overall biomechanics. Despite its clinical importance, a standardized system for describing femoral notching is lacking. We propose a novel Femoral Notch Classification, based on resection depths and trochlear geometry, intended as a common language applicable both intraoperatively and on lateral radiographs, independent of alignment philosophy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The classification was developed through clinical observation and biomechanical rationale, focusing on preserving anterior cortical integrity while permitting a controlled notch when required. Definitions relate resection depths to implant thickness, distal femoral anatomy, and trochlear geometry, with attention to balancing anterior and posterior gaps. Perpendicularity of the anterior cut relative to the cortex can be evaluated and adapted according to implant design and alignment technique. Four descriptive categories were established, providing a structured framework for assessment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>(1) Type 0\u2014No Notch: Complete preservation of the anterior cortex with no visible step-off or indentation. Anterior resection may match implant thickness precisely; if not, anterior overstuffing or posterior over-resection should be controlled. (2) Type 1\u2014On the Line: Anterior resection is flush with the femoral cortex, creating a subtle notch that remains biomechanically stable without compromising the cortex. (3) Type 2\u2014Controlled Notch: A deeper anterior resection (ideally,\u2009&lt;\u20093\u00a0mm) beyond the cortical line in the presence of specific trochlear geometry or distal femoral anatomy. This configuration is acceptable when the radiographic pattern is consistent with trochlear accommodation. Posterior gaps must still be carefully controlled to avoid overstuffing. (4) Type 3\u2014Critical Notch: Excessive anterior resection (&gt;\u20093\u00a0mm) characterized by significant cortical interruption and the absence of a radiographically identifiable anatomical correlate. This configuration may compromise distal femoral strength and is associated with increased risk of periprosthetic fracture when not justified by trochlear geometry. Surgeons should exercise caution and verify proper implant alignment. Inter-observer reliability was substantial (Fleiss\u2019 \u03ba\u2009=\u20090.80; quadratic weighted \u03ba\u2009=\u20090.87) and intra-observer reliability was almost perfect (mean Cohen\u2019s \u03ba\u2009=\u20090.91). The majority of cases were classified as Type 0 and Type 1.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Femoral Notch Classification provides a practical, reproducible framework for assessing femoral notching in TKA, suitable for intraoperative guidance and radiographic analysis. It may help surgeons avoid over- or under-resection while allowing a controlled notch when required. Further clinical validation is needed to assess its impact on long-term patient outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s42836-026-00424-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T23:01:42Z","timestamp":1788390102000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A novel classification system for anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Alexander","family":"Antoniadis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jaad","family":"Mahlouly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thibaut","family":"Royon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julien","family":"Wegrzyn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"424_CR1","first-page":"2411","volume":"87","author":"MA Ritter","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ritter MA, Thong AE, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB, Berend ME, Pierson JL, Davis KE. The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of postoperative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(11):2411 American Volume.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg."},{"issue":"8","key":"424_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200008000-00005","volume":"82","author":"ML Lesh","year":"2000","unstructured":"Lesh ML, Schneider DJ, Deol G, et al. The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(8):1096\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-200008000-00005.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"424_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200301000-00018","volume":"85","author":"SB Shawen","year":"2003","unstructured":"Shawen SB, Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, et al. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(1):115\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-200301000-00018.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"5","key":"424_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2005.08.020","volume":"21","author":"P Zalzal","year":"2006","unstructured":"Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross AE, Papini M. Notching of the anterior femoral cortex during total knee arthroplasty: characteristics that increase local stresses. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(5):737.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"6","key":"424_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.034","volume":"34","author":"HG Puranik","year":"2019","unstructured":"Puranik HG, Mukartihal R, Patil SS, Dhanasekaran SR, Menon VK. Does femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty influence periprosthetic fracture? A prospective study. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(6):1244\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.034.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"5","key":"424_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.3109\/17453670903350099","volume":"80","author":"N Gujarathi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gujarathi N, Putti AB, Abboud RJ, et al. Risk of periprosthetic fracture after anterior femoral notching. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(5):553\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453670903350099.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"424_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-05643-9","volume":"23","author":"JC Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang JC, Zhang LS, Zhou H, et al. Stress distribution patterns during the gait cycle in patients with anterior femoral notching following total knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):718. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-022-05643-9.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"2","key":"424_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2186-6087","volume":"37","author":"PW Knapp","year":"2024","unstructured":"Knapp PW, Scuderi GR. Anatomic referencing restores the anatomy of the distal femur with less compromise. J Knee Surg. 2024;37(2):114\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2186-6087.","journal-title":"J Knee Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"424_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.05.049","volume":"30","author":"RM Meneghini","year":"2015","unstructured":"Meneghini RM, Mont MA, Backstein DB, et al. Development of a modern Knee Society radiographic evaluation system and methodology for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(12):2311\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2015.05.049.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"11","key":"424_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1981","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.08.013","volume":"30","author":"RK Elmallah","year":"2015","unstructured":"Elmallah RK, Scuderi GR, Jauregui JJ, et al. Radiographic evaluations of revision total knee arthroplasty: a plea for uniform assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(11):1981\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2015.08.013.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"2","key":"424_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-03828-w","volume":"142","author":"M Citak","year":"2022","unstructured":"Citak M, Levent A, Suero EM, et al. A novel radiological classification system of the distal femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(2):315\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-021-03828-w.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"424_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-019-03255-4","volume":"49","author":"C Zhang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhang C, Xie G, Dong S, et al. A novel morphological classification for the femoral notch based on MRI: a simple and effective assessment method for the femoral notch. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49(1):75\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-019-03255-4.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"424_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-5898(05)70319-9","volume":"29","author":"GA Engh","year":"1998","unstructured":"Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29(2):205\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0030-5898(05)70319-9.","journal-title":"Orthop Clin North Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"424_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-022-04517-y","volume":"143","author":"Y Khan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Khan Y, Arora S, Kashyap A, Patralekh MK, Maini L. Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(1):453\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-022-04517-y.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"424_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04670-2","volume":"22","author":"J Itou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Itou J, Kuwashima U, Itoh M, Okazaki K. Anterior prominence of the femoral condyle varies among prosthesis designs and surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):784. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-021-04670-2.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"}],"container-title":["Arthroplasty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s42836-026-00424-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s42836-026-00424-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s42836-026-00424-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T23:01:44Z","timestamp":1788390104000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s42836-026-00424-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["424"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s42836-026-00424-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2524-7948"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2524-7948","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 May 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 July 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Informed consent was not required for this retrospective study that used fully anonymized radiographs. The determination was made in accordance with institutional regulations of Lausanne University Hospital and applicable Swiss research guidelines for retrospective analysis of anonymized imaging data. No formal ethics committee approval was required.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"66"}}