{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T11:35:23Z","timestamp":1793878523245,"version":"4.7.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779321600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779321600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Egypt Heart J"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel calcium modification strategy with little evidence of efficacy compared to widely used rotational atherectomy (RA).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We sought to compare the efficacy and safety level between IVL and RA in moderate-to-severe coronary artery calcification (CAC).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We searched three databases until March 2025 for eligible observational studies and randomized controlled trials. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) while secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, periprocedural complication, and procedural outcomes. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) was used for dichotomous endpoints, and inverse variance mean difference (MD) for continuous variables, both with 95% confidence interval (CI).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Seven observational studies and two randomized clinical trials (RCT) with 968 patients were included; 418 IVL-treated patients and 550 RA-treated patients. IVL is associated with lower risk of MACE (IVL 1.5% vs. RA 5.3%; RR: 0.34 CI: 0.13\u20130.87) and all-cause mortality (IVL 1.6% vs. RA 5.4%; RR: 0.35 CI: 0.15\u20130.81) in in-hospital outcome. However, assessed with longer follow-up, IVL developed comparable risk of MACE (IVL 4.3% vs. RA 7.7%; RR 0.70 CI: 0.42\u20131.18) compared to RA while all-cause mortality remained lower in IVL (2.5% vs. 7.0%; RR: 0.41 CI: 0.22\u20130.78). No significant differences were observed in the risk of myocardial infarction (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.58), nor in the risk of dissection (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.52), perforation (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.22), or slow\/no-reflow (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.07). IVL likewise demonstrated comparable procedural performance, including procedural success, angiographic success, fluoroscopy duration, and procedural time.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>IVL has similar outcomes to RA in terms of procedure outcomes and periprocedural complications. However, IVL is associated with lower all-cause mortality and MACE specifically in short term outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s43044-026-00747-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T07:57:00Z","timestamp":1779350220000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy for coronary atherosclerosis calcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"78","author":[{"given":"Pirel Aulia","family":"Baravia","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Faqrizal Ria","family":"Qhabibi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Isman","family":"Firdaus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"747_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm14040438","volume":"14","author":"C Oliveira","year":"2024","unstructured":"Oliveira C, Vilela M, Nobre Menezes M, Silva Marques J, Jorge CM, Rodrigues T et al (2024) Coronary intravascular lithotripsy effectiveness and safety in a real-world cohort. J Pers Med 14(4):438","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"747_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2021.03.036","volume":"14","author":"DJ Kereiakes","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kereiakes DJ, Virmani R, Hokama JY, Illindala U, Mena-Hurtado C, Holden A et al (2021) Principles of intravascular lithotripsy for calcific plaque modification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14(12):1275\u20131292","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"11","key":"747_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpcardiol.2021.101076","volume":"47","author":"DA Jazar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jazar DA, Thakker R, Salehin S, Hasan SM, Jabri A, Albaeni A et al (2022) Use of coronary intravascular lithotripsy: a comprehensive review of literature. Curr Probl Cardiol 47(11):101076","journal-title":"Curr Probl Cardiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"747_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-20-0761","volume":"85","author":"S Jia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jia S, Li J, Zhang C, Liu Y, Yuan D, Xu N et al (2020) Long-term prognosis of moderate to severe coronary artery calcification in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 85(1):50\u201358","journal-title":"Circ J"},{"issue":"2","key":"747_CR5","first-page":"187","volume":"94","author":"SK Sharma","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sharma SK, Bolduan RW, Patel MR, Martinsen BJ, Azemi T, Giugliano G et al (2019) Impact of calcification on percutaneous coronary intervention: MACE-Trial 1-year results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 94(2):187\u2013194","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"5","key":"747_CR6","first-page":"859","volume":"91","author":"RS Copeland-Halperin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Copeland-Halperin RS, Baber U, Aquino M, Rajamanickam A, Roy S, Hasan C et al (2018) Prevalence, correlates, and impact of coronary calcification on adverse events following PCI with newer-generation DES: Findings from a large multiethnic registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 91(5):859\u2013866","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"1","key":"747_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1186\/s12872-024-03965-1","volume":"24","author":"Y Zhao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhao Y, Wang P, Zheng Z, Shi Y, Liu J (2024) Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy for the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 24(1):311","journal-title":"BMC Cardiovasc Disord"},{"issue":"6","key":"747_CR8","first-page":"997","volume":"102","author":"PB Sandesara","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sandesara PB, Elhage Hassan M, Shekiladze N, Turk AA, Montrivade S, Gold D et al (2023) Intravascular lithotripsy compared to rotational atherectomy for the treatment of calcified distal left main coronary artery disease: a single center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 102(6):997\u20131003","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"6","key":"747_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1097\/MCA.0000000000001344","volume":"35","author":"S Garzon","year":"2024","unstructured":"Garzon S, Bezerra F, Mariani J, Bandeira W, Prado G, Rueda V et al (2024) Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions: the STIFF (S tenoses with calcificaTIon treated with angioplasty e FF ected with dedicated interventional tools) study. Coron Artery Dis 35(6):445\u2013450","journal-title":"Coron Artery Dis"},{"key":"747_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jurado-Rom\u00e1n A, G\u00f3mez-Menchero A, Rivero-Santana B, Amat-Santos IJ, Jim\u00e9nez-Valero S, Caballero-Borrego J et al (2025) Rotational atherectomy, lithotripsy, or laser for calcified coronary stenosis: The ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22 trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/39918495\/","DOI":"10.24875\/RECICE.M23000381"},{"key":"747_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2023.04.019","volume":"55","author":"K Hesse","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hesse K, Shahid F, Ahmed R, Ahmed F, Cartlidge TRG, Rashid M et al (2023) Early experience of intravascular lithotripsy in unprotected calcified left main coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 55:33\u201341","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Revasc Med"},{"issue":"18","key":"747_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2022.07.034","volume":"15","author":"T Rheude","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rheude T, Fitzgerald S, Allali A, Mashayekhi K, Gori T, Cuculi F et al (2022) Rotational atherectomy or balloon-based techniques to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 15(18):1864\u20131874","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"2","key":"747_CR13","first-page":"295","volume":"103","author":"AB Gruslova","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gruslova AB, Inanc IH, Cilingiroglu M, Katta N, Milner TE, Feldman MD (2024) Review of intravascular lithotripsy for treating coronary, peripheral artery, and valve calcifications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 103(2):295\u2013307","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"4","key":"747_CR14","first-page":"411","volume":"8","author":"J Yeoh","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yeoh J, Hill J (2019) Intracoronary lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified plaque. Interv Cardiol Clin 8(4):411\u2013424","journal-title":"Interv Cardiol Clin"},{"issue":"8","key":"747_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJ-D-18-01056","volume":"15","author":"CS Dini","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dini CS, Tomberli B, Mattesini A, Ristalli F, Valente S, Stolcova M et al (2019) Intravascular lithotripsy for calcific coronary and peripheral artery stenoses. EuroIntervention 15(8):714\u2013721","journal-title":"EuroIntervention"},{"issue":"10","key":"747_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e008434","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008434","volume":"12","author":"ZA Ali","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ali ZA, Nef H, Escaned J, Werner N, Banning AP, Hill JM et al (2019) Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary stenoses: The Disrupt CAD II study: The Disrupt CAD II study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 12(10):e008434","journal-title":"Circ Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"8","key":"747_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcmg.2017.05.012","volume":"10","author":"ZA Ali","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ali ZA, Brinton TJ, Hill JM, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Karimi Galougahi K et al (2017) Optical coherence tomography characterization of coronary lithoplasty for treatment of calcified lesions: First description. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(8):897\u2013906","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Imaging"},{"key":"747_CR18","unstructured":"Wells G, Shea B, O\u2019Connell D, Robertson J, Peterson J, Welch V et al The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta- analysis. http:\/\/www.evidencebasedpublichealth.de\/download\/Newcastle_Ottowa_Scale_Pope_Bruce.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2024"},{"issue":"oct18 2","key":"747_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","volume":"343","author":"JPT Higgins","year":"2011","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Altman DG, G\u00f8tzsche PC, J\u00fcni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration\u2019s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343(oct18 2):d5928","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7414","key":"747_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JPT Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557\u2013560","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"20","key":"747_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2781","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6525","volume":"34","author":"M Kicinski","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kicinski M, Springate DA, Kontopantelis E (2015) Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: M. KICINSKI, D. A. SPRINGATE AND E. KONTOPANTELIS. Stat Med 34(20):2781\u20132793","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"747_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03000605241305369","volume":"52","author":"B Li","year":"2024","unstructured":"Li B, Li J, Hu G, Zhang S, Ren Y, Li M et al (2024) Study on the use of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy: a single-center, retrospective study. J Int Med Res 52(12):3000605241305369","journal-title":"J Int Med Res"},{"key":"747_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2022.10.011","volume":"48","author":"MAA Mousa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mousa MAA, Bingen BO, Al Amri I, Mertens BJA, Taha S, Tohamy A et al (2023) Efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy in balloon-crossable heavily calcified coronary lesions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 48:1\u20136","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Revasc Med"},{"key":"747_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1451229","DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2024.1451229","volume":"11","author":"TT Krause","year":"2024","unstructured":"Krause TT, Afzal SS, Gjata A, Lindner M, Saad L, Steinbach M et al (2024) Comparison of patients undergoing protected high risk percutaneous coronary intervention using either intravascular lithotripsy or rotational atherectomy. Front Cardiovasc Med 11:1451229","journal-title":"Front Cardiovasc Med"},{"key":"747_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.02.028","volume":"197","author":"F Blachutzik","year":"2023","unstructured":"Blachutzik F, Meier S, Weissner M, Schlattner S, Gori T, Ullrich-Daub H et al (2023) Comparison of coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy in the modification of severely calcified stenoses. Am J Cardiol 197:93\u2013100","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"747_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2022.01.066","volume":"352","author":"E Gallinoro","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gallinoro E, Monizzi G, Sonck J, Candreva A, Mileva N, Nagumo S et al (2022) Physiological and angiographic outcomes of PCI in calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy. Int J Cardiol 352:27\u201332","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"key":"747_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2024.10.018","volume":"235","author":"PEP Carvalho","year":"2025","unstructured":"Carvalho PEP, Strepkos D, Alexandrou M, Mutlu D, Ser OS, Choi JW et al (2025) Intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy in coronary chronic total occlusions: Analysis from the prospective global registry for the study of chronic total occlusion intervention registry. Am J Cardiol 235:37\u201343","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"747_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2024.05.030","volume":"68","author":"F Blachutzik","year":"2024","unstructured":"Blachutzik F, Meier S, Blachutzik M, Schlattner S, Gori T, Ullrich-Daub H et al (2024) Comparison of interventional treatment options for coronary calcified nodules: a sub-analysis of the ROTA.shock trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 68:37\u201342","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Revasc Med"},{"key":"747_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2023.07.174","volume":"205","author":"H Farhat","year":"2023","unstructured":"Farhat H, Kuzemczak M, Durel N, Caillot N, Paw\u0142owski T, Lipiecki J (2023) Rotational atherectomy versus intravascular lithotripsy for calcified in-stent restenosis: a single-center study with 1-year follow-up. Am J Cardiol 205:413\u2013419","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"issue":"15","key":"747_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9011","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph19159011","volume":"19","author":"P Rola","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rola P, Kulczycki JJ, W\u0142odarczak A, Barycki M, W\u0142odarczak S, Szudrowicz M et al (2022) Intravascular Lithotripsy as a novel treatment method for calcified unprotected Left Main diseases-comparison to rotational Atherectomy-short-term outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(15):9011","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"747_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ali ZA, Shin D, Singh M, Malik S, Sakai K, Honton B, Kereiakes DJ, Hill JM, Saito S, Di Mario C, Gonzalo N (2024) Outcomes of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified nodules: a pooled analysis of the Disrupt CAD studies. Euro Intervent 20(23):e1454","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJ-D-24-00282"},{"key":"747_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, Klein AJ, Riley RF, Price MJ, Herrmann HC, Bachinsky W, Waksman R, Stone GW, Disrupt Cad III Investigators (2020) Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 76(22):2635\u20132646","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2020.09.603"},{"key":"747_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saito S, Yamazaki S, Takahashi A, Namiki A, Kawasaki T, Otsuji S, Nakamura S, Shibata Y, Disrupt Cad IV Investigators (2021) Intravascular lithotripsy for vessel preparation in severely calcified coronary arteries prior to stent placement\u2015primary outcomes from the Japanese disrupt CAD IV study. Circulat J 85(6):826\u2013833","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-20-1174"},{"key":"747_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tomey MI, Kini AS, Sharma SK (2014) Current status of rotational atherectomy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7(4):345\u2013353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2013.12.196"},{"key":"747_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sharma SK, Tomey MI, Teirstein PS, Kini AS, Reitman AB, Lee AC et al (2019) North American expert review of rotational atherectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 12(5):e007448","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007448"},{"key":"747_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gupta R, Hosseinpour A, Patel C, Malik AH, Goel A, Bandyopadhyay D et al (2024) Intravascular lithotripsy compared with rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 63:76\u201378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carrev.2024.01.012"},{"key":"747_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Suruagy-Motta RFO, Cabe\u00e7a LS, Da Silva AMP, Neves GR, Camarotti MT, Lima LCV et al (2025) Intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions: a systematic review and an updated meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 106(1):563\u2013572","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.31591"}],"container-title":["The Egyptian Heart Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s43044-026-00747-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s43044-026-00747-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s43044-026-00747-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T07:57:06Z","timestamp":1779350226000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s43044-026-00747-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["747"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s43044-026-00747-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2090-911X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2090-911X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 September 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 May 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human ethics and consent to participate"}}],"article-number":"36"}}