{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T20:19:15Z","timestamp":1772223555779,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,14]],"date-time":"2022-12-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1670976000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,14]],"date-time":"2022-12-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1670976000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Musculoskelet Disord"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Neck-shaft angle (NSA) is of paramount importance to orthopedic surgeons due to its implications for various pathologies of the hip and femur. The primary aim of the study was to establish if NSA measurement may be affected by imaging position (standing and supine) and provide evidence regarding whether the contralateral NSA can be used as a template. The secondary aim was to determine a reference value and precisely understand the effects of sex on NSA measurement.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We measured bilateral NSA in a retrospective study of 200 standing and 200 supine anteroposterior pelvis radiographs that met the inclusion criteria, while paying special attention to bilateral hip symmetry. The overall inter-rater reliability was 0.688 (CI 0.128\u20130.851). Matching was performed according to sex (exact matching) and age. Paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and independent sample t-test were used (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.01).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 400 pairs of femoral necks were reviewed, comprising of 200 males and 200 females. In the upright radiograph, the overall mean NSA was 131.21\u00b0\u2009\u00b1\u20094.72\u00b0. There was no significant difference between right and left femur NSA among the patients (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.95). On both sides, male NSA was higher than female NSA (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). In supine radiograph, the overall mean NSA for the supine position was 133.06\u00b0\u2009\u00b1\u20095.71\u00b0. There was a significant difference between NSA of the right and left femur among the patients in the supine position (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). On supine radiographs there was no statistically significant difference between male and female NSA (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.85).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Our findings indicated no significant variability in upright radiographs between the right and left NSA. In contrast, significant asymmetry between the right and left NSA was found in the supine radiographs. However, this study does not provide definitive clinical evidence, and further clinical-oriented research is required.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Level of evidence<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Level III; retrospective comparative study.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-06071-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,14]],"date-time":"2022-12-14T04:33:54Z","timestamp":1670992434000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Femoral neck shaft angle measurement on plain radiography: is standing or supine radiograph a reliable template for the contralateral femur?"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"23","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7246-2384","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bassem","family":"Haddad","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2382-5585","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mohammad","family":"Hamdan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1726-2237","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mohammad","family":"Al Nawaiseh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0514-4682","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Osama","family":"Aldowekat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3806-2859","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mohammad Ali","family":"Alshrouf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9182-2111","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Abdulrahman M.","family":"Karam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2046-8343","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Muayad I.","family":"Azzam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9689-7451","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anas","family":"AR Altamimi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6864-9891","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Muntaser","family":"Abu Shokor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"6071_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2826-3","volume":"40","author":"T Shoji","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shoji T, Yamasaki T, Izumi S, et al. The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2016;40:245\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-015-2826-3.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"6071_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3172","DOI":"10.1002\/art.23939","volume":"58","author":"M Doherty","year":"2008","unstructured":"Doherty M, Courtney P, Doherty S, et al. Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3172\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/art.23939.","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"key":"6071_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20130358","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20130358","volume":"87","author":"C Ripamonti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Avella M. Femoral neck shaft angle width is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently of femoral neck bone density. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20130358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20130358.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"6071_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1136\/bjsports-2011-090744","volume":"46","author":"A Fearon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fearon A, Stephens S, Cook J, et al. The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:888\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjsports-2011-090744.","journal-title":"Br J Sports Med"},{"key":"6071_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1239","DOI":"10.1007\/s11517-015-1392-6","volume":"53","author":"H Bouma","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bouma H, Hogervorst T, Audenaert E, van Kampen P. Combining femoral and acetabular parameters in femoroacetabular impingement: the omega surface. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015;53:1239\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11517-015-1392-6.","journal-title":"Med Biol Eng Comput"},{"key":"6071_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1097\/00004694-200011000-00007","volume":"20","author":"RM Kay","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kay RM, Jaki KA, Skaggs DL. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:736\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00004694-200011000-00007.","journal-title":"J Pediatr Orthop"},{"key":"6071_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2014.931196","volume":"85","author":"P Lechler","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lechler P, Frink M, Gulati A, et al. The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:389\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2014.931196.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"6071_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.94B4.28067","volume":"94","author":"C Merle","year":"2012","unstructured":"Merle C, Waldstein W, Pegg E, et al. Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:477\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.94B4.28067.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"6071_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-015-2236-z","volume":"45","author":"CK Boese","year":"2016","unstructured":"Boese CK, Dargel J, Oppermann J, et al. The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45:19\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-015-2236-z.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"6071_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1111\/joa.12073","volume":"223","author":"I Gilligan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gilligan I, Chandraphak S, Mahakkanukrauh P. Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side. J Anat. 2013;223:133\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joa.12073.","journal-title":"J Anat"},{"key":"6071_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.9734\/jammr\/2020\/v32i1630624","volume":"32","author":"I Altubasi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Altubasi I, Hamzeh H, Madi M. Measurement of Neck-Shaft Angle Using CT Scout View in Healthy Jordanian Adults - A Reliability and Agreement Study. J Adv Med Med Res. 2020;32:9\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.9734\/jammr\/2020\/v32i1630624.","journal-title":"J Adv Med Med Res"},{"key":"6071_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2019.1690873","volume":"91","author":"CS Fischer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fischer CS, K\u00fchn J-P, V\u00f6lzke H, et al. The neck-shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors. Acta Orthop. 2020;91:53\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2019.1690873.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"6071_CR13","first-page":"587","volume":"53","author":"F Elbuken","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elbuken F, Baykara M, Ozturk C. Standardisation of the neck-shaft angle and measurement of age-, gender- and BMI-related changes in the femoral neck using DXA. Singapore Med J. 2012;53:587\u201390.","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"6071_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8645027","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/8645027","volume":"2016","author":"CK Boese","year":"2016","unstructured":"Boese CK, Frink M, Jostmeier J, et al. The Modified Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle: Age- and Sex-Dependent Reference Values and Reliability Analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:8645027. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2016\/8645027.","journal-title":"BioMed Res Int"},{"key":"6071_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000000891","volume":"94","author":"N Jiang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jiang N, Peng L, Al-Qwbani M, et al. Femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion in Chinese Han population: a retrospective analysis of 466 healthy adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94: e891. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000000891.","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"6071_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","volume":"15","author":"TK Koo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012.","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med"},{"key":"6071_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1002\/ajpa.23311","volume":"164","author":"SL Child","year":"2017","unstructured":"Child SL, Cowgill LW. Femoral neck-shaft angle and climate-induced body proportions. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;164:720\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajpa.23311.","journal-title":"Am J Phys Anthropol"},{"key":"6071_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e467","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/57130600","volume":"85","author":"S Gnudi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gnudi S, Sitta E, Pignotti E. Prediction of incident hip fracture by femoral neck bone mineral density and neck-shaft angle: a 5-year longitudinal study in post-menopausal females. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e467\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr\/57130600.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"6071_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2583","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1754-1","volume":"469","author":"D Wright","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wright D, Whyne C, Hardisty M, et al. Functional and anatomic orientation of the femoral head. Clin Orthop. 2011;469:2583\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-010-1754-1.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"6071_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546511424390","volume":"40","author":"LT Buller","year":"2011","unstructured":"Buller LT, Rosneck J, Monaco FM, et al. Relationship Between Proximal Femoral and Acetabular Alignment in Normal Hip Joints Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2011;40:367\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546511424390.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"Pt 2","key":"6071_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-7580.1998.19220279.x","volume":"192","author":"JY Anderson","year":"1998","unstructured":"Anderson JY, Trinkaus E. Patterns of sexual, bilateral and interpopulational variation in human femoral neck-shaft angles. J Anat. 1998;192(Pt 2):279\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1469-7580.1998.19220279.x.","journal-title":"J Anat"},{"key":"6071_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.15212\/FMCH.2015.0148","volume":"4","author":"GF Sharkas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sharkas GF, Saheb T, Arqoub K, Haddadin R. Sedentary lifestyle among adults in Jordan. Fam Med Community Health. 2016;4:4\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15212\/FMCH.2015.0148.","journal-title":"Fam Med Community Health"},{"key":"6071_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1089\/met.2007.0030","volume":"6","author":"Y Khader","year":"2008","unstructured":"Khader Y, Batieha A, Ajlouni H, et al. Obesity in Jordan: prevalence, associated factors, comorbidities, and change in prevalence over ten years. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6:113\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/met.2007.0030.","journal-title":"Metab Syndr Relat Disord"},{"key":"6071_CR24","first-page":"22","volume":"64","author":"CK Chiu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chiu CK, Chan CYW, Singh VA. Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases. Med J Malaysia. 2009;64:22\u20136.","journal-title":"Med J Malaysia"},{"key":"6071_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.18203\/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20164173","volume":"2","author":"SK Pathak","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pathak SK, Maheshwari P, Ughareja P, et al. Evaluation of femoral neck shaft angle on plain radiographs and its clinical implications. Int J Res Orthop. 2016;2:383.","journal-title":"Int J Res Orthop"},{"key":"6071_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.3109\/17453678208992292","volume":"53","author":"O Reiker\u00e5s","year":"1982","unstructured":"Reiker\u00e5s O, H\u00f8iseth A. Femoral neck angles in osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:781\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453678208992292.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Scand"},{"key":"6071_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001096","volume":"32","author":"JA Parry","year":"2018","unstructured":"Parry JA, Barrett I, Schoch B, et al. Does the Angle of the Nail Matter for Pertrochanteric Fracture Reduction? Matching Nail Angle and Native Neck-Shaft Angle. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:174\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001096.","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"6071_CR28","first-page":"553","volume":"106","author":"SR Chhibber","year":"1970","unstructured":"Chhibber SR, Singh I. Asymmetry in muscle weight and one-sided dominance in the human lower limbs. J Anat. 1970;106:553\u20136.","journal-title":"J Anat"},{"key":"6071_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rogers MJ, King TL, Kim J, et al. Femoral Neck Shaft Angle and Management of Proximal Femur Fractures: Is the Contralateral Femur a Reliable Template?. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35:529\u201334.","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002069"},{"key":"6071_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1447-9","volume":"469","author":"NH Mast","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop. 2011;469:188\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-010-1447-9.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"6071_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.72.856.10474491","volume":"72","author":"M Nelitz","year":"1999","unstructured":"Nelitz M, Guenther KP, Gunkel S, Puhl W. Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:331\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.72.856.10474491.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"6071_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbspin.2012.02.002","volume":"80","author":"R Bouttier","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bouttier R, Morvan J, Mazieres B, et al. Reproducibility of radiographic hip measurements in adults. Joint Bone Spine. 2013;80:52\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbspin.2012.02.002.","journal-title":"Joint Bone Spine"},{"key":"6071_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-015-2314-2","volume":"45","author":"CK Boese","year":"2016","unstructured":"Boese CK, Jostmeier J, Oppermann J, et al. The neck shaft angle: CT reference values of 800 adult hips. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45:455\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00256-015-2314-2.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"6071_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1136\/ard.2003.018424","volume":"63","author":"M Lequesne","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lequesne M, Malghem J, Dion E. The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1145\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/ard.2003.018424.","journal-title":"Ann Rheum Dis"},{"key":"6071_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1093\/rheumatology\/33.5.432","volume":"33","author":"RJ Moore","year":"1994","unstructured":"Moore RJ, Fazzalari NL, Manthey BA, Vernon-Roberts B. The relationship between head-neck-shaft angle, calcar width, articular cartilage thickness and bone volume in arthrosis of the hip. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:432\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rheumatology\/33.5.432.","journal-title":"Br J Rheumatol"},{"key":"6071_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.3109\/17453678208992291","volume":"53","author":"O Reiker\u00e5s","year":"1982","unstructured":"Reiker\u00e5s O, H\u00f8iseth A, Reigstad A, F\u00f6nstelien E. Femoral neck angles: a specimen study with special regard to bilateral differences. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:775\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453678208992291.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Scand"},{"key":"6071_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.74B1.1732260","volume":"74","author":"PJ Rubin","year":"1992","unstructured":"Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, et al. The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:28\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.74B1.1732260.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"6071_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000161","volume":"39","author":"M Sangeux","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sangeux M, Pascoe J, Graham HK, et al. Three-dimensional measurement of femoral neck anteversion and neck shaft angle. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39:83\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/RCT.0000000000000161.","journal-title":"J Comput Assist Tomogr"},{"key":"6071_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2325967120S0016","DOI":"10.1177\/2325967120S00167","volume":"8","author":"AM Spiker","year":"2020","unstructured":"Spiker AM, Graf RM, Duminie SP, et al. Differences in radiographic measurements on standing versus supine pelvic radiographs. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8:2325967120S00167. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2325967120S00167.","journal-title":"Orthop J Sports Med"},{"key":"6071_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1692","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-4766-7","volume":"474","author":"TJ Jackson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jackson TJ, Estess AA, Adamson GJ. Supine and standing AP pelvis radiographs in the evaluation of pincer femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop. 2016;474:1692\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-016-4766-7.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"}],"container-title":["BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12891-022-06071-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12891-022-06071-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12891-022-06071-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,14]],"date-time":"2022-12-14T04:34:38Z","timestamp":1670992478000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12891-022-06071-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,14]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6071"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-022-06071-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2474"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2474","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 September 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 December 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Institutional Review Board of the University of Jordan (Approval No. 1020225721; 1 March 2022). Informed written consent was obtained from the patients.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable (NA).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work. Informed written consent was obtained from the patients.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"1092"}}