<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<crossref_result xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0" version="3.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref_query_output3.0.xsd">
  <query_result>
    <head>
      <doi_batch_id>none</doi_batch_id>
    </head>
    <body>
      <query status="resolved">
        <doi type="journal_article">10.1190/geo2011-0259.1</doi>
        <crm-item name="publisher-name" type="string">Society of Exploration Geophysicists</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="prefix-name" type="string">Society of Exploration Geophysicists</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="member-id" type="number">186</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citation-id" type="number">56029095</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="journal-id" type="number">5981</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="deposit-timestamp" type="number">2025121115260109300</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="owner-prefix" type="string">10.1190</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="last-update" type="date">2025-12-11T20:26:11Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="created" type="date">2012-06-14T18:25:09Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citedby-count" type="number">27</crm-item>
        <doi_record>
          <crossref xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1 http://doi.crossref.org/schemas/unixref1.1.xsd">
            <journal>
              <journal_metadata language="en">
                <full_title>Geophysics</full_title>
                <issn media_type="electronic">1942-2156</issn>
                <issn media_type="print">0016-8033</issn>
              </journal_metadata>
              <journal_issue>
                <publication_date media_type="other">
                  <month>07</month>
                  <day>1</day>
                  <year>2012</year>
                </publication_date>
                <publication_date media_type="print">
                  <month>07</month>
                  <day>01</day>
                  <year>2012</year>
                </publication_date>
                <journal_volume>
                  <volume>77</volume>
                </journal_volume>
                <issue>4</issue>
              </journal_issue>
              <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
                <titles>
                  <title>Viabilities of seismic ray impedance and elastic impedance for hydrocarbon-sand discrimination</title>
                </titles>
                <contributors>
                  <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Feng</given_name>
                    <surname>Zhang</surname>
                    <affiliations>
                      <institution>
                        <institution_name>China University of Petroleum 1 , Department of Geophysical Prospecting, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Beijing, ; , Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Center for Reservoir Geophysics, London, E-mail: f.zhang717@googlemail.com .</institution_name>
                        <institution_place>China U. K.</institution_place>
                      </institution>
                      <institution>
                        <institution_name>Imperial College London 1 , Department of Geophysical Prospecting, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Beijing, ; , Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Center for Reservoir Geophysics, London, E-mail: f.zhang717@googlemail.com .</institution_name>
                        <institution_place>China U. K.</institution_place>
                      </institution>
                    </affiliations>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Yanghua</given_name>
                    <surname>Wang</surname>
                    <affiliations>
                      <institution>
                        <institution_name>Imperial College London 2 , Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Center for Reservoir Geophysics, London, . E-mail: yanghua.wang@imperial.ac.uk .</institution_name>
                        <institution_place>U. K</institution_place>
                      </institution>
                    </affiliations>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
                    <given_name>Xiang-Yang</given_name>
                    <surname>Li</surname>
                    <affiliations>
                      <institution>
                        <institution_name>China University of Petroleum 3 , Department of Geophysical Prospecting, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Beijing, ; , British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, . E-mail: xyl@bgs.ac.uk .</institution_name>
                        <institution_place>China U. K</institution_place>
                      </institution>
                      <institution>
                        <institution_name>University of Edinburgh 3 , Department of Geophysical Prospecting, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Beijing, ; , British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, . E-mail: xyl@bgs.ac.uk .</institution_name>
                        <institution_place>China U. K</institution_place>
                      </institution>
                    </affiliations>
                  </person_name>
                </contributors>
                <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1">
                  <jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Theoretical evaluation of the elastic impedance (EI) and the ray impedance (RI) reveals that RI has a more reliable value range and is less sensitive to noise than EI. We devised a new measurement RI˜ to estimate the ray impedance from elastic impedance derived by existing techniques. The recovered RI˜ was expressed in the form of a normalization of EI. It solved the range variability problem of EI and had the same interpretation capability as RI. In addition, reflection coefficients represented by RI˜ showed good agreement with the Zeoppritz equation even at postcritical angle of incidence. Tests of these three attributes (RI, RI˜, and EI) were performed on the log data of three different types of reservoir: a typical Class III marine gas-sand, a Class I tight gas-sand, and a Class II oil-bearing sand in thin sand-mud interbedded layers. Although the crossplots of EI against acoustic impedance (AI) showed visually similar characteristics for a gas-sand as that of RI, based on the linear/quadratic discrimination analysis, RI appeared to be more applicable than EI for characterizing gas sands, especially tight gas sands. RI˜, estimated from EI, had a comparable value range to the AI, and retained the interpretation ability of the original RI. Application on real seismic data showed that existing EI inversion results could be improved straightforwardly by means of the introduced transformation.</jats:p>
                </jats:abstract>
                <publication_date media_type="other">
                  <month>07</month>
                  <day>1</day>
                  <year>2012</year>
                </publication_date>
                <publication_date media_type="print">
                  <month>07</month>
                  <day>01</day>
                  <year>2012</year>
                </publication_date>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>06</month>
                  <day>14</day>
                  <year>2012</year>
                </publication_date>
                <pages>
                  <first_page>M39</first_page>
                  <last_page>M52</last_page>
                </pages>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.1190/geo2011-0259.1</doi>
                  <resource>https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geophysics/article/77/4/M39/308407/Viabilities-of-seismic-ray-impedance-and-elastic</resource>
                  <collection property="syndication">
                    <item>
                      <resource mime_type="application/pdf" content_version="vor">https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/seg/geophysics/article-pdf/77/4/M39/3227417/geo2011-0259.pdf</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="crawler-based">
                    <item crawler="iParadigms">
                      <resource>https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/seg/geophysics/article-pdf/77/4/M39/3227417/geo2011-0259.pdf</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="list-based" multi-resolution="unlock">
                    <item label="geoscienceworld" setbyID="soeg">
                      <resource>http://geophysics.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/doi/10.1190/geo2011-0259.1</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                </doi_data>
                <citation_list>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r1">
                    <volume_title>Quantitative seismology: Theory and methods</volume_title>
                    <author>Aki</author>
                    <cYear>1980</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r2">
                    <volume_title>Quantitative seismic interpretation</volume_title>
                    <author>Avseth</author>
                    <cYear>2005</cYear>
                    <doi provider="crossref">10.1017/CBO9780511600074</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r3">
                    <issn>0016-8025</issn>
                    <journal_title>Geophysical Prospecting</journal_title>
                    <author>Bortfeld</author>
                    <volume>9</volume>
                    <cYear>1961</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1111/gpr.1961.9.issue-4</doi>
                    <article_title>Approximation to the reflection and transmission coefficients of plane longitudinal and transverse waves</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r4">
                    <issn>1070-485X</issn>
                    <journal_title>The Leading Edge</journal_title>
                    <author>Connolly</author>
                    <volume>18</volume>
                    <cYear>1999</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1190/1.1438307</doi>
                    <article_title>Elastic impedance</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r5">
                    <issn>1742-2132</issn>
                    <journal_title>Journal of Geophysics and Engineering</journal_title>
                    <author>Gan</author>
                    <volume>6</volume>
                    <cYear>2009</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1088/1742-2132/6/1/002</doi>
                    <article_title>Seismic resolution enhancement for tight-sand gas reservoir characterization</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r6">
                    <volume_title>Seismic amplitude interpretation: 2001 distinguished instructor short course</volume_title>
                    <author>Hilterman</author>
                    <cYear>2001</cYear>
                    <doi provider="crossref">10.1190/1.9781560801993</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r7">
                    <author>Lu</author>
                    <cYear>2009</cYear>
                    <article_title>Elastic parameters inversion through ray impedance</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r8">
                    <issn>0016-8033</issn>
                    <journal_title>Geophysics</journal_title>
                    <author>Rutherford</author>
                    <volume>54</volume>
                    <cYear>1989</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1190/1.1442696</doi>
                    <article_title>Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r9">
                    <issn>0016-8033</issn>
                    <journal_title>Geophysics</journal_title>
                    <author>Santos</author>
                    <volume>69</volume>
                    <cYear>2004</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1190/1.1707079</doi>
                    <article_title>Impedance-type approximations of the P-P elastic reflection coefficients: Modeling and AVO inversion</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r10">
                    <issn>0016-8033</issn>
                    <journal_title>Geophysics</journal_title>
                    <author>Sava</author>
                    <volume>68</volume>
                    <cYear>2003</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1190/1.1581078</doi>
                    <article_title>Angle-domain common-image gathers by wavefield continuation methods</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r11">
                    <issn>1742-2132</issn>
                    <journal_title>Journal of Geophysics and Engineering</journal_title>
                    <author>Tang</author>
                    <volume>5</volume>
                    <cYear>2008</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1088/1742-2132/5/1/010</doi>
                    <article_title>PP and PS seismic response from fractured tight gas reservoirs: A case study</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r12">
                    <author>VerWest</author>
                    <cYear>2004</cYear>
                    <doi provider="crossref">10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.3.P342</doi>
                    <article_title>Elastic impedance revisited</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r13">
                    <issn>0016-8033</issn>
                    <journal_title>Geophysics</journal_title>
                    <author>Wang</author>
                    <volume>64</volume>
                    <cYear>1999</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1190/1.1444698</doi>
                    <article_title>Approximations to the Zoeppritz equations and their use in AVO analysis</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r14">
                    <volume_title>Seismic amplitude inversion in reflection tomography</volume_title>
                    <author>Wang</author>
                    <cYear>2003</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r15">
                    <issn>0016-8033</issn>
                    <journal_title>Geophysics</journal_title>
                    <author>Whitcombe</author>
                    <volume>67</volume>
                    <cYear>2002</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1190/1.1451331</doi>
                    <article_title>Elastic impedance normalization</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r16">
                    <issn>0016-8033</issn>
                    <journal_title>Geophysics</journal_title>
                    <author>Xu</author>
                    <volume>66</volume>
                    <cYear>2001</cYear>
                    <doi>10.1190/1.1487131</doi>
                    <article_title>Common-angle migration: A strategy for imaging complex media</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="2025121115260109300_r17">
                    <unstructured_citation>Zhang
              F.
            
          , 2010, Joint inversion of seismic PP- and PS-waves in the ray parameter domain: Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                </citation_list>
              </journal_article>
            </journal>
          </crossref>
        </doi_record>
      </query>
    </body>
  </query_result>
</crossref_result>