{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T13:40:41Z","timestamp":1770039641512,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"Royal College of Psychiatrists","issue":"445","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,8]],"date-time":"2018-02-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1518048000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":20949,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. ment. sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1960,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The court hearing (Bolam <jats:italic>v<\/jats:italic>. Friern Hospital Management Committee) showed that British psychiatrists disagreed about the best technique of administering electroplexy. The implications of this were discussed in a recent communication (1), which also contained an extensive review of the literature showing a similar disagreement amongst previous authorities. In order to ascertain which E.C.T. techniques were most widely practised in this country, a questionnaire was circulated to a number of mental and teaching hospitals and the results of this, which were reported in full (1, 3), are summarized in Table I.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.106.445.1347","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,8,6]],"date-time":"2008-08-06T18:02:31Z","timestamp":1218045751000},"page":"1347-1360","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["An Evaluation of Electroplexy (E.C.T.) Techniques"],"prefix":"10.1192","volume":"106","author":[{"given":"J. C.","family":"Barker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. G.","family":"Thorpe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"170","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0368315X00234476_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.105.441.1022"},{"key":"S0368315X00234476_ref4","first-page":"29","article-title":"\u201cA Comparative Study of Modified and Unmodified Electric Shock Treatment\u201d","volume":"19","author":"Havens","year":"1958","journal-title":"Dis Nerv. Syst."},{"key":"S0368315X00234476_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.104.437.1069"},{"key":"S0368315X00234476_ref3","first-page":"793","article-title":"\u201cRisks Associated with Modified Electroplexy\u201d","volume":"ii","year":"1959","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"S0368315X00234476_ref2","first-page":"496","article-title":"\u201cProlonged Apnoea following E.C.T. Modified by Suxethonium Bromide (Brevidil \u2018E\u2019)\u201d","volume":"105","author":"May","year":"1959","journal-title":"Ibid."},{"key":"S0368315X00234476_ref6","volume-title":"\u201c\u2018Ectonus\u2019\u2014An Improved Electro-convulsant Therapy Technique\u201d","author":"Russell"},{"key":"S0368315X00234476_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.103.430.270"}],"container-title":["Journal of Mental Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0368315X00234476","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,5]],"date-time":"2019-06-05T19:27:25Z","timestamp":1559762845000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0368315X00234476\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1960,10]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"445","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1960,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0368315X00234476"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1192\/bjp.106.445.1347","relation":{},"ISSN":["0368-315X","2514-9946"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0368-315X","type":"print"},{"value":"2514-9946","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1960,10]]}}}