{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T18:24:43Z","timestamp":1771611883762,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Royal College of Psychiatrists","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]],"date-time":"2021-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633996800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Br J Psychiatry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Summary<\/jats:title><jats:p>Electroconvulsive therapy is a highly effective treatment in psychiatry but still carries a stigma. One possible explanation is that it can be seen as a threat to personal autonomy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.2021.135","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]],"date-time":"2021-10-12T07:12:52Z","timestamp":1634022772000},"page":"113-114","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Why electroconvulsive therapy still carries a stigma"],"prefix":"10.1192","volume":"220","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3227-8440","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joel","family":"Paris","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"170","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.298.3.330"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/YCT.0000000000000655"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref2","volume-title":"Shock Therapy: A History of Electroconvulsive Treatment in Mental Illness","author":"Shorter","year":"2007"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1176\/appi.ps.202000387"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.2021.116"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapsychiatry.2018.0768"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-02732-2"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40596-020-01292-z"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref9","volume-title":"Mad in America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and the Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill","author":"Whitaker","year":"2001"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/clipsy.9.1.35"},{"key":"S0007125021001355_ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1176\/appi.ps.72301"}],"container-title":["The British Journal of Psychiatry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0007125021001355","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,21]],"date-time":"2022-02-21T14:35:46Z","timestamp":1645454146000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0007125021001355\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0007125021001355"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1192\/bjp.2021.135","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1250","1472-1465"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1250","type":"print"},{"value":"1472-1465","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}}]}}