<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<crossref_result xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0" version="3.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref_query_output3.0.xsd">
  <query_result>
    <head>
      <doi_batch_id>none</doi_batch_id>
    </head>
    <body>
      <query status="resolved">
        <doi type="journal_article">10.1193/1.3050449</doi>
        <crm-item name="publisher-name" type="string">Wiley</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="prefix-name" type="string">Wiley (John Wiley &amp; Sons)</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="member-id" type="number">311</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citation-id" type="number">36099689</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="journal-id" type="number">5867</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="deposit-timestamp" type="number">2026012504131800258</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="owner-prefix" type="string">10.1002</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="last-update" type="date">2026-01-25T15:04:22Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="created" type="date">2009-02-03T18:46:04Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citedby-count" type="number">49</crm-item>
        <doi_record>
          <crossref xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1 http://doi.crossref.org/schemas/unixref1.1.xsd">
            <journal>
              <journal_metadata language="en">
                <full_title>Earthquake Spectra</full_title>
                <abbrev_title>Earthquake Spectra</abbrev_title>
                <issn media_type="print">8755-2930</issn>
                <issn media_type="electronic">1944-8201</issn>
              </journal_metadata>
              <journal_issue>
                <publication_date media_type="print">
                  <month>02</month>
                  <year>2009</year>
                </publication_date>
                <journal_volume>
                  <volume>25</volume>
                </journal_volume>
                <issue>1</issue>
              </journal_issue>
              <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
                <titles>
                  <title>Assessment of Continuous Span Bridges through Nonlinear Static Procedures</title>
                </titles>
                <contributors>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first">
                    <given_name>Rui</given_name>
                    <surname>Pinho</surname>
                    <affiliation>University of Pavia Structural Mechanics Department Via Ferrata 1 27100 Pavia Italy</affiliation>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
                    <given_name>Ricardo</given_name>
                    <surname>Monteiro</surname>
                    <affiliation>University of Porto Civil Engineering Department Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n 4200‐465 Porto Portugal</affiliation>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
                    <given_name>Chiara</given_name>
                    <surname>Casarotti</surname>
                    <affiliation>European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE) 27100 Pavia Italy</affiliation>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
                    <given_name>Raimundo</given_name>
                    <surname>Delgado</surname>
                    <affiliation>University of Porto Civil Engineering Department Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n 4200‐465 Porto Portugal</affiliation>
                  </person_name>
                </contributors>
                <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" abstract-type="main">
                  <jats:p>Nonlinear static procedures constitute an important tool in design office application of performance‐based earthquake engineering concepts, and for this reason, they have been extensively developed and promoted in the last decade or so. However, these efforts focused predominantly on the assessment of buildings, rather than bridges, and hence there is currently a need to verify the validity in the application of such pushover‐based methods for the assessment of bridges or viaducts. In this work, therefore, by considering a wide set of bridge configurations subjected to equally varying seismic input intensity levels, four commonly employed nonlinear static procedures (CSM, N2, MPA, ACSM) are scrutinized and compared, with a view to establish their adequacy for the seismic assessment of existing continuous span bridges. Results seem to indicate that all methods are able to predict displacement response with good accuracy, while force estimation, on the other hand, is reasonably attained only by those approaches where higher modes effects are explicitly accounted for.</jats:p>
                </jats:abstract>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>02</month>
                  <year>2009</year>
                </publication_date>
                <publication_date media_type="print">
                  <month>02</month>
                  <year>2009</year>
                </publication_date>
                <pages>
                  <first_page>143</first_page>
                  <last_page>159</last_page>
                </pages>
                <publisher_item>
                  <identifier id_type="doi">10.1193/1.3050449</identifier>
                </publisher_item>
                <archive_locations>
                  <archive name="Portico" />
                </archive_locations>
                <ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators">
                  <ai:license_ref applies_to="vor" start_date="2009-02-01">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor</ai:license_ref>
                  <ai:license_ref applies_to="tdm">http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1</ai:license_ref>
                </ai:program>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.1193/1.3050449</doi>
                  <resource>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1193/1.3050449</resource>
                  <collection property="country-based">
                    <item country="CN">
                      <resource>http://sage.cnpereading.com/paragraph/article/?doi=10.1193/1.3050449</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="crawler-based">
                    <item crawler="iParadigms">
                      <resource>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1193/1.3050449</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="text-mining">
                    <item>
                      <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1193/1.3050449</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="list-based" multi-resolution="unlock">
                    <item label="geoscienceworld" setbyID="silver_mr">
                      <resource>https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/earthquake-spectra/article/25/1/143/586962/assessment-of-continuous-span-bridges-through</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                </doi_data>
              </journal_article>
            </journal>
          </crossref>
        </doi_record>
      </query>
    </body>
  </query_result>
</crossref_result>