{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T13:53:47Z","timestamp":1753883627901,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":["ascopubs.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["JCO Clin Cancer Inform"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>PURPOSE<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into health care processes can improve engagement with patients; however, adopting PROs at scale is challenging. The aim of this study was to describe the design, development, and adoption at scale of a comprehensive PRO program for standard of care and research at a cancer center.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Requirements for a PRO program were obtained from multiple stakeholders. Components of the program included a governance process to assure a consistent and satisfactory experience for patients completing PRO questionnaires, tools to create and manage questionnaires and related content, methods to send questionnaires to relevant patients at the appropriate time, interactive tools for patients to complete the questionnaires as part of their portal experience, and integration of PRO data into workflows for clinicians. We used descriptive statistics to assess the use of the program from 2016 to 2023.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>From program launch (on February 1, 2016) until December 31, 2023, 189 unique questionnaires were developed (101 for standard-of-care, 70 for research, and 18 for quality improvement). Of the 432,497 unique patients who were assigned at least one questionnaire, 314,685 (73%) completed at least one. Of 5,948,464 questionnaires sent, 3,098,574 (52%) were completed. The median completion time was 2 minutes.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>CONCLUSION<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Large-scale adoption of PROs at a cancer center is feasible. Key considerations for success include governance processes, attention to patient experience and clinician workflow, and the ability to manage complex inclusion criteria and timing of delivery of questionnaires. These principles should be disseminated so the full potential of PROs in health care can be realized.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1200\/cci-24-00253","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T20:00:25Z","timestamp":1745352025000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/crossmark","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Patient-Reported Outcomes Program at Scale at a Cancer Center"],"prefix":"10.1200","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2355-2556","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Fernanda C.G.","family":"Polubriaginof","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Digital Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2423-2220","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Allison","family":"Lipitz-Snyderman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Digital Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7742-5950","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Susan","family":"Chimonas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Digital Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8984-1302","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Gilad J.","family":"Kuperman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Digital Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4130-1577","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Peter D.","family":"Stetson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Digital Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"233","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_5_2_2","first-page":"61","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)","volume":"6","author":"Weldring T","year":"2013","unstructured":"Weldring T, Smith SMS: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights 6:61-68, 2013","journal-title":"Health Serv Insights"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2015.1362"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1611252"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_5_2","article-title":"Clinical utility and user perceptions of a digital system for electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring during routine cancer care: Findings from the PRO-TECT trial","author":"Basch E","unstructured":"Basch E, Stover AM, Schrag D, et al: Clinical utility and user perceptions of a digital system for electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring during routine cancer care: Findings from the PRO-TECT trial. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 10.1200\/CCI.20.00081","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/OP.22.00294"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_7_2","first-page":"448","article-title":"Effect of electronic symptom monitoring on patient-reported outcomes among patients with metastatic cancer: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"328","author":"Denis F","year":"2022","unstructured":"Denis F, Basch E, Septans M, et al: Effect of electronic symptom monitoring on patient-reported outcomes among patients with metastatic cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 328:448-457, 2022","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.18085"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2013.53.5948"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_10_2","first-page":"350","article-title":"Systemwide implementation of patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care at a children's hospital","volume":"44","author":"Erickson JM","year":"2018","unstructured":"Erickson JM, Blackwood A, Sievers M, et al: Systemwide implementation of patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care at a children's hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 44:350-359, 2018","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_11_2","first-page":"612","article-title":"Seamless integration of computer-adaptive patient-reported outcomes into an electronic health record","volume":"14","author":"Hornik K","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hornik K, Moser P, Klaghofer R, et al: Seamless integration of computer-adaptive patient-reported outcomes into an electronic health record. Appl Clin Inform 14:612-624, 2023","journal-title":"Appl Clin Inform"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_12_2","unstructured":"HealthMeasures: PROMIS\u2014Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system. https:\/\/www.healthmeasures.net\/explore-measurement-systems\/promis"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.OA.19.00052"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_14_2","first-page":"749","article-title":"Patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures","volume":"31","author":"Stover AM","year":"2022","unstructured":"Stover AM, Tompkins-Strout B, Hamlin W, et al: Patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures. Qual Life Res 31:749-758, 2022","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_15_2","first-page":"416","article-title":"Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient-reported outcomes portal","volume":"26","author":"Wu Y","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wu Y, Glaser A, Sharpe L, et al: Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient-reported outcomes portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 26:416-423, 2019","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2007.11.2243"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_17_2","first-page":"3384","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology","volume":"27","author":"Basch E","year":"2009","unstructured":"Basch E, Jia X, Heller G, et al: Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology. J Clin Oncol 27:3384-3390, 2009","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_18_2","first-page":"729","article-title":"Association between electronic patient symptom reporting with alerts and potentially avoidable urgent care visits after ambulatory cancer surgery","volume":"156","author":"Schnipper JL","year":"2021","unstructured":"Schnipper JL, Gormley EA, Schiff GD, et al: Association between electronic patient symptom reporting with alerts and potentially avoidable urgent care visits after ambulatory cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 156:729-737, 2021","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005005"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_20_2","first-page":"2098","article-title":"Patients and consumers (and the data they generate): An underutilized resource","volume":"28","author":"Wu Y","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wu Y, Abernethy AP, Nagelschneider AA, et al: Patients and consumers (and the data they generate): An underutilized resource. J Am Med Inform Assoc 28:2098-2102, 2021","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"}],"container-title":["JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/ascopubs.org\/doi\/pdfdirect\/10.1200\/CCI-24-00253","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T20:00:29Z","timestamp":1745352029000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ascopubs.org\/doi\/10.1200\/CCI-24-00253"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1200\/CCI-24-00253"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/cci-24-00253","relation":{},"ISSN":["2473-4276"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2473-4276"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-10-11","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-01-24","order":1,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-03-03","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-04-22","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"e2400253"}}