{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,15]],"date-time":"2025-10-15T17:43:34Z","timestamp":1760550214076},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)","issue":"10","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCO"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1987,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> Spinal involvement by systemic malignancy is common, and often leads to extradural compression of the spinal cord and\/or nerve roots by metastases. Rapid, anatomically accurate diagnosis is essential to the successful management of these patients. We compared spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with conventional myelography in a series of 31 cancer patients being evaluated for myelopathy (N = 10), or back\/radicular pain (N = 21). All patients were evaluated between April 1985 and July 1986, and underwent both studies within ten days of each other (median, two days). MRI was performed on a 0.5 Tesla Technicare unit with a body surface coil, and results compared with standard contrast myelography. All studies were reviewed separately and in a \"blinded\" fashion. MRI and myelography were comparable in detecting large lesions that produced complete subarachnoid block (five of ten patients with myelopathy, three of twenty-one patients with back\/radicular pain). In 19 of 31 patients, smaller but clinically significant extradural lesions were found. In nine of 19 cases, these lesions were demonstrated equally well by both modalities; in nine of 19 cases, these lesions were demonstrated by myelography alone; in one of 19, a lesion was demonstrated by MRI alone. Given our current technology, myelography appeared superior to MRI as a single imaging modality. However, MRI may be an alternative in patients where total myelography is technically impossible or unusually hazardous. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1200\/jco.1987.5.10.1663","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,23]],"date-time":"2017-02-23T13:25:50Z","timestamp":1487856350000},"page":"1663-1669","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":57,"title":["Comparison of spinal magnetic resonance imaging and myelography in cancer patients."],"prefix":"10.1200","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"C","family":"Hagenau","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"W","family":"Grosh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Currie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R G","family":"Wiley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"233","container-title":["Journal of Clinical Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/ascopubs.org\/doi\/pdfdirect\/10.1200\/JCO.1987.5.10.1663","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,25]],"date-time":"2022-05-25T22:38:59Z","timestamp":1653518339000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ascopubs.org\/doi\/10.1200\/JCO.1987.5.10.1663"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1987,10]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1987,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1200\/JCO.1987.5.10.1663"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/jco.1987.5.10.1663","relation":{},"ISSN":["0732-183X","1527-7755"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0732-183X","type":"print"},{"value":"1527-7755","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1987,10]]}}}