{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,10]],"date-time":"2024-09-10T22:49:23Z","timestamp":1726008563334},"edition-number":"0","reference-count":1,"publisher":"CRC Press","isbn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"9780429227622"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,5]]},"DOI":"10.1201\/b15986-30","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,10,30]],"date-time":"2013-10-30T15:28:51Z","timestamp":1383146931000},"page":"137-140","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Different methods for composite removal after bracket debonding"],"prefix":"10.1201","member":"301","reference":[{"key":"ref25","unstructured":"Albuquerque, G., et al. 2010. Evaluation of enamel roughness after ceramic bracket debonding and clean-up with different methods. Braz J Oral Sci. 9(Orthodontics): 4. Bishara, S.E., et al. 2007. Shear bond strength comparison of two adhesive systems following thermocycling. A new self-etch primer and a resin-modified glass ionomer. Angle Orthod, 77(2): 337\u201341. Boyer, D.B., et al. 1995. Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108(3): 262\u20136. Brosh, T., et al. 2005. In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods. J Biomech, 38(5): 1107\u201313. Buonocore, M.G. 1955. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34(6): 849\u201353. Campbell, P.M. 1995. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod, 65(2): 103\u201310. Chen, C.S., et al. 2008. Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod, 78(6): 1071\u20137. Dragiff, D. A. 1979. A new debonding procedure. J. Clin. Ortho, 13(2): 107\u201311. Eliades, T., et al. 2004. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods. Eur J Orthod, 26(3): 333\u20138. Eminkahyagil, N., et al. 2006 Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod, 76(2): 314\u201321. Hayakawa, K. 2005. Nd: YAG laser for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128(5): 638\u201347. Hong, Y.H. & Lew, K.K. 1995. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding. Eur J Orthod, 17(2): 121\u20138. Joo, H.J., et al. 2011. Influence of orthodontic adhesives and clean-up procedures on the stain susceptibility of enamel after debonding. Angle Orthod, 81(2): 334\u201340. Karan, S., et al. 2010. Enamel surface roughness after debonding. Angle Orthod. 80(6): 1081\u20138. Katona, T.R. 1997. Stresses developed during clinical debonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod, 67(1): 39\u201346. Miksic, M. 2003 Stereomicroscope analysis of enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding. Coll Antropol. 27 Suppl 2: 83\u20139. Naini, F.B. & Gill D.S. 2008. Tooth fracture associated with debonding a metal orthodontic bracket: A case report. World J Orthod, 9(3): e78\u201382. Newman, G.V. 1965. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod, 51(12): 901\u201312. Obata, A., et al. 1999. Super pulse CO2 laser for bracket bonding and debonding. Eur J Orthod. 21(2): 193\u20138. Retief, D.H. & Denys F.R. 1979. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments. Angle Orthod. 49(1): 1\u201310. Rouleau Jr., B.D., et al. 1982. Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontics brackets. Am. J. Orthod., 81: 423\u201326. Roush, E.L., et al. 1997. In vitro study assessing enamel surface roughness subsequent to various final finishing procedures after debonding. Northwest Dent Res, 7(2): 2\u20136. Schuler, F.S., et al. 2003. SEM-evaluation of enamel surfaces after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances.Am J Dent, 16(6): 390\u20134. Stratmann, U., et al.1996. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive microand image-analysis. Eur J Orthod, 18(6): 655\u201362. Thomas, B.W., et al. 1996. Laser-aided degradation of composite resin. Angle Orthod, 66(4): 281-6. Ulusoy, C. 2009. Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding. J Appl Oral Sci, 17(3): 209\u201315. van Waes, H., et al. 1997. Three-dimensional measurement of enamel loss caused by bonding and debonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 112(6): 666\u20139. Watanabea H., et al. 2003. In vitro and in vivo studies on application of erbium: YAG laser for dentine hypersensitivity. International Congress Series, 1248(Periodontology): 3. Zarrinnia, K., et al. 1995. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108(3): 284\u201393."}],"container-title":["Biodental Engineering II"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,24]],"date-time":"2020-12-24T02:11:51Z","timestamp":1608775911000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.taylorfrancis.com\/books\/9781315798264\/chapters\/10.1201\/b15986-30"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,5]]},"ISBN":["9780429227622"],"references-count":1,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1201\/b15986-30","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,5]]}}}