{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T17:23:09Z","timestamp":1786123389904,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>BACKGROUND:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring has been advocated to deal with residual neuromuscular block. Phonomyography (PMG) is a technology that captures the acoustic signals yielded by muscle contraction, which is easy to use, anti-interference, and has multiple alternative monitoring sites. Our previous study has developed a PMG prototype for neuromuscular monitoring, and its feasibility was preliminarily verified, but further study on its clinical reliability with different neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBs) is needed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>METHODS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This single-center, prospective, observational study compared the effect of a PMG prototype and TOF-Watch SX on neuromuscular monitoring of the ipsilateral adductor pollicis muscle with the use of non-depolarizing and depolarizing NMBs among 102 surgical patients. Patients were divided into 3 groups by NMBs, namely Group C (cisatricurium), Group V (vecuronium), and Group S (succinylcholine). The PMG prototype and TOF-Watch SX were placed at ipsilateral hand of each individual and measured data from NMBs administration to a stable train-of-four ratio (TOFr) \u2265 0.9 or\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">T<\/jats:italic>\n                      value \u2265 0.9 were compared.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>RESULTS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Eighty patients were included in the data analysis. For non-depolarizing NMBs, the PMG prototype recorded a longer onset time compared to TOF-Watch SX (median [interquartile range, IQR], 210 [180\u2013240] seconds vs 150 [135\u2013180] seconds,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      .001, mean bias 48 [40\u201355]; mean \u00b1 [standard deviation, SD], 197 \u00b1 48 seconds vs 159 \u00b1 36 seconds,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      .001, mean bias 38 [28\u201348]; for Group C and Group V, respectively) and a shorter full recovery time (4014 \u00b1 511 seconds vs 5072 \u00b1 713 seconds,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      .001, mean bias \u22121058 [\u22121215 to \u2212901], 3352 \u00b1 791 seconds vs 4931 \u00b1 902 seconds,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      .001, mean bias \u22121084 [\u22121237 to \u2212931], for Group C and Group V, respectively). For depolarizing NMBs, the results were similar (94 \u00b1 26 seconds vs 80 \u00b1 25 seconds,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      .001, mean bias 15 [10\u201319] for onset time; 447 \u00b1 126 seconds vs 689 \u00b1 223 seconds,\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P &lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      .001, mean bias \u2212242 [\u2212294 to \u2212191] for full recovery time).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>When non-depolarizing NMBs were administered, the PMG prototype measured a significantly longer onset and a shorter recovery time compared with TOF-Watch SX. The same trend was also found when depolarizing NMBs were administered. The PMG prototype is clinical feasible and stable but not interchangeable with TOF-Watch SX.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0000000000007648","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]],"date-time":"2025-07-31T17:03:14Z","timestamp":1753981394000},"page":"264-273","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparison of Phonomyography Prototype With Train-of-Four Watch SX for Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Prospective Observational Study"],"prefix":"10.1213","volume":"142","author":[{"given":"Yanjie","family":"Dong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"From theDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yi","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People\u2019s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Weichao","family":"Guo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Meta Robotics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shuangwen","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"From theDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hui","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"From theDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qian","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"From theDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000004379","article-title":"2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuromuscular Blockade.","volume":"138","author":"Thilen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R2-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1212","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.15501","article-title":"Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists.","volume":"76","author":"Klein","year":"2021","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R3-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001769","article-title":"Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: a guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.","volume":"40","author":"Fuchs-Buder","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"R4-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2448","DOI":"10.3390\/s22072448","article-title":"Phonomyography on perioperative neuromuscular monitoring: An overview.","volume":"22","author":"Dong","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sensors (Basel)"},{"key":"R5-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"770105","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.770105","article-title":"Neuromuscular blocking agents and monitoring in China: a cross-sectional survey of current management.","volume":"9","author":"Wu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Med (Lausanne)"},{"key":"R6-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13030861","article-title":"Residual neuromuscular block remains a safety concern for perioperative healthcare professionals: a comprehensive review.","volume":"13","author":"Blum","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"R7-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.16238","article-title":"Residual neuromuscular block: time to consign it to history.","volume":"79","author":"Rodney","year":"2024","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R8-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000096003.64059.97","article-title":"Phonomyography and mechanomyography can be used interchangeably to measure neuromuscular block at the adductor pollicis muscle.","volume":"98","author":"Hemmerling","year":"2004","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R9-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03021816","article-title":"Comparison of phonomyography, kinemyography and mechanomyography for neuromuscular monitoring.","volume":"53","author":"Trager","year":"2006","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R10-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.3390\/bioengineering11050486","article-title":"The effect of phonomyography prototype for intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring: a preliminary study.","volume":"11","author":"Dong","year":"2024","journal-title":"Bioengineering (Basel)"},{"key":"R11-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x","article-title":"Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: The Stockholm revision.","volume":"51","author":"Fuchs-Buder","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"R12-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000144067.42615.AD","article-title":"Dominance of the hand does not change the phonomyographic measurement of neuromuscular block at the adductor pollicis muscle.","volume":"100","author":"Michaud","year":"2005","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R13-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.4097\/kjae.2013.65.1.33","article-title":"The effect of hand dominance on neuromuscular monitoring at the adductor pollicis muscle.","volume":"65","author":"Jeong","year":"2013","journal-title":"Korean J Anesth"},{"key":"R14-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000194876.00551.0e","article-title":"The dose of succinylcholine in morbid obesity.","volume":"102","author":"Lemmens","year":"2006","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R15-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-016-0609-y","article-title":"Monitoring recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block using acceleromyography at the trapezius versus the adductor pollicis muscle: an observational trial.","volume":"63","author":"Soltesz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"R16-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000002387","article-title":"Neuromuscular monitoring in the perioperative period.","volume":"126","author":"Murphy","year":"2018","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R17-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000003896","article-title":"Ipsilateral and simultaneous comparison of responses from acceleromyography- and electromyography-based neuromuscular monitors.","volume":"135","author":"Nemes","year":"2021","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"R18-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000005897","article-title":"A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle using TOF-watch SX and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using tetragraph in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: A prospective observational study.","volume":"135","author":"Iwasaki","year":"2022","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"R19-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2023.10.022","article-title":"Phase III clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of adamgammadex with sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block.","volume":"132","author":"Zhang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R20-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1007\/s10877-022-00922-1","article-title":"A survey on the availability, usage and perception of neuromuscular monitors in Europe.","volume":"37","author":"Carvalho","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Clin Monit Comput"},{"key":"R21-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/88.3.389","article-title":"Phonomyography of the corrugator supercilii muscle: signal characteristics, best recording site and comparison with acceleromyography.","volume":"88","author":"Hemmerling","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R22-20260109","first-page":"150","article-title":"Relaxofon: a neuromuscular blockade monitor for patients under general anesthesia.","volume":"2012","author":"Wehbe","year":"2012","journal-title":"Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc"},{"key":"R23-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03016873","article-title":"Duration of control stimulation does not affect onset and offset of neuromuscular blockade at the corrugator supercilii muscle measured with phonomyography or acceleromyography.","volume":"49","author":"Hemmerling","year":"2002","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R24-20260109","first-page":"i78i78","article-title":"Awareness during emergence from anaesthesia: significance of neuromuscular monitoring in patients with butyrylcholinesterase deficiency.","volume":"115","author":"Thomsen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R25-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13353","article-title":"Succinylcholine and neuromuscular blockade monitoring.","volume":"71","author":"Sabate","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"R26-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annfar.2013.12.017","article-title":"Prolonged phase II neuromuscular blockade following succinylcholine administration.","volume":"33","author":"Jurkolow","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann Fr Anesth Reanim"},{"key":"R27-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/58.6.620","article-title":"Atracurium and vecuronium: effect of dose on the time of onset.","volume":"58","author":"Healy","year":"1986","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"R28-20260109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.auec.2020.02.005","article-title":"Neuromuscular monitoring during modified rapid sequence induction: a comparison of TOF-Cuff and TOF-Scan.","volume":"23","author":"Chau","year":"2020","journal-title":"Australas Emerg Care"}],"container-title":["Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1213\/ANE.0000000000007648","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T14:34:21Z","timestamp":1786113261000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.1213\/ANE.0000000000007648"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1213\/ane.0000000000007648","relation":{},"ISSN":["0003-2999","1526-7598"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0003-2999","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-7598","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,31]]}}}