{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:51:32Z","timestamp":1791323492837,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"Institute of Mathematical Statistics","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann. Statist."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper studies the use of highly stratified designs for the efficient estimation of a large class of treatment effect parameters that arise in the analysis of experiments. By a \u201chighly stratified\u201d design, we mean experiments in which units are divided into blocks of a fixed size and a proportion within each block is assigned to a binary treatment uniformly at random. The class of parameters considered are those that can be expressed as the solution to a set of moment conditions constructed using a known function of the observed data. They include, among other things, average treatment effects, quantile treatment effects and local average treatment effects as well as the counterparts to these quantities in experiments in which the unit is itself a cluster. In this setting, we establish three results. First, we show that under a highly stratified design, the na\u00efve method of moments estimator achieves the same asymptotic variance as what could typically be attained under alternative treatment assignment mechanisms only through ex post covariate adjustment. Second, we argue that the na\u00efve method of moments estimator under a highly stratified design is asymptotically efficient by deriving a lower bound on the asymptotic variance of regular estimators of the parameter of interest in the form of a convolution theorem. In this sense, highly stratified experiments are attractive because they lead to efficient estimators of treatment effect parameters \u201cby design.\u201d Finally, we strengthen this conclusion by establishing conditions under which a \u201cfast-balancing\u201d property of highly stratified designs is in fact necessary for the na\u00efve method of moments estimator to attain the efficiency bound.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-aos2636","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T08:17:16Z","timestamp":1787041036000},"page":"1979-2004","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["On the efficiency of highly stratified experiments"],"prefix":"10.1214","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1711-1220","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yuehao","family":"Bai","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Economics, University of Southern California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jizhou","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"HSBC Business School, Peking University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Azeem M.","family":"Shaikh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Economics, University of Chicago"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Max","family":"Tabord-Meehan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Economics, University of Toronto"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"108","reference":[{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Chen, X.<\/small>, <small>Hong, H.<\/small> and <small>Tarozzi, A.<\/small> (2008). Semiparametric efficiency in GMM models with auxiliary data. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>36<\/b> 808\u2013843.","DOI":"10.1214\/009053607000000947"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>FOGARTY, C. B.<\/small> (2018). Regression-assisted inference for the average treatment effect in paired experiments. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>105<\/b> 994\u20131000.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asy034"},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>LI, X.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2020). Rerandomization and regression adjustment. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>82<\/b> 241\u2013268.","DOI":"10.1111\/rssb.12353"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>LI, X.<\/small>, <small>DING, P.<\/small> and <small>RUBIN, D. B.<\/small> (2018). Asymptotic theory of rerandomization in treatment-control experiments. <i>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<\/i> <b>115<\/b> 9157\u20139162.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1808191115"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>HANNEKE, S.<\/small>, <small>KONTOROVICH, A.<\/small>, <small>SABATO, S.<\/small> and <small>WEISS, R.<\/small> (2021). Universal Bayes consistency in metric spaces. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>49<\/b> 2129\u20132150.","DOI":"10.1214\/20-aos2029"},{"key":"62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>van der Vaart, A.<\/small> (1989). On the asymptotic information bound. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>17<\/b> 1487\u20131500.","DOI":"10.1214\/aos\/1176347377"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Belloni, A.<\/small>, <small>Chernozhukov, V.<\/small>, <small>Fern\u00e1ndez-Val, I.<\/small> and <small>Hansen, C.<\/small> (2017). Program evaluation and causal inference with high-dimensional data. <i>Econometrica<\/i> <b>85<\/b> 233\u2013298.","DOI":"10.3982\/ECTA12723"},{"key":"56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>NEWEY, W. K.<\/small> and <small>MCFADDEN, D.<\/small> (1994). Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. In <i>Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. IV<\/i>. <i>Handbooks in Econom.<\/i> <b>2<\/b> 2111\u20132245. North-Holland, Amsterdam.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1573-4412(05)80005-4"},{"key":"61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>TSIATIS, A. A.<\/small>, <small>DAVIDIAN, M.<\/small>, <small>ZHANG, M.<\/small> and <small>LU, X.<\/small> (2008). Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: A principled yet flexible approach. <i>Stat. Med.<\/i> <b>27<\/b> 4658\u20134677.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3113"},{"key":"60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>ROBINS, J. M.<\/small>, <small>ROTNITZKY, A.<\/small> and <small>ZHAO, L. P.<\/small> (1995). Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>90<\/b> 106\u2013121.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1995.10476493"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>FREEDMAN, D. A.<\/small> (2008). On regression adjustments to experimental data. <i>Adv. in Appl. Math.<\/i> <b>40<\/b> 180\u2013193.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aam.2006.12.003"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>IMAI, K.<\/small>, <small>KING, G.<\/small> and <small>NALL, C.<\/small> (2009). The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican universal health insurance evaluation. <i>Statist. Sci.<\/i> <b>24<\/b> 29\u201353.","DOI":"10.1214\/08-STS274"},{"key":"53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>LIU, H.<\/small> and <small>YANG, Y.<\/small> (2020). Regression-adjusted average treatment effect estimates in stratified randomized experiments. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>107<\/b> 935\u2013948.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asaa038"},{"key":"57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>PASHLEY, N. E.<\/small> and <small>MIRATRIX, L. W.<\/small> (2021). Insights on variance estimation for blocked and matched pairs designs. <i>J. Educ. Behav. Stat.<\/i> <b>46<\/b> 271\u2013296.","DOI":"10.3102\/1076998620946272"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>FARRELL, M. H.<\/small> (2015). Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations. <i>J. Econometrics<\/i> <b>189<\/b> 1\u201323.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2015.06.017"},{"key":"68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ZHANG, M.<\/small>, <small>TSIATIS, A. A.<\/small> and <small>DAVIDIAN, M.<\/small> (2008). Improving efficiency of inferences in randomized clinical trials using auxiliary covariates. <i>Biometrics<\/i> <b>64<\/b> 707\u2013715.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1541-0420.2007.00976.x"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>Hirano, K.<\/small> and <small>Imbens, G. W.<\/small> (2001). Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. <i>Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol.<\/i> <b>2<\/b> 259\u2013278.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1020371312283"},{"key":"63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>van der Vaart, A. W.<\/small> (1998). <i>Asymptotic Statistics<\/i>. <i>Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics<\/i> <b>3<\/b>. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802256"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Fogarty, C. B.<\/small> (2018). On mitigating the analytical limitations of finely stratified experiments. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>80<\/b> 1035\u20131056.","DOI":"10.1111\/rssb.12290"},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Imbens, G. W.<\/small> and <small>Angrist, J. D.<\/small> (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. <i>Econometrica<\/i> <b>62<\/b> 467\u2013475.","DOI":"10.2307\/2951620"},{"key":"52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Lin, W.<\/small> (2013). Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman\u2019s critique. <i>Ann. Appl. Stat.<\/i> <b>7<\/b> 295\u2013318.","DOI":"10.1214\/12-AOAS583"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Han, Q.<\/small> and <small>Wellner, J. A.<\/small> (2021). Complex sampling designs: Uniform limit theorems and applications. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>49<\/b> 459\u2013485.","DOI":"10.1214\/20-AOS1964"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Efron, B.<\/small> (1971). Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>58<\/b> 403\u2013417.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/58.3.403"},{"key":"48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Li, X.<\/small> and <small>Ding, P.<\/small> (2017). General forms of finite population central limit theorems with applications to causal inference. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>112<\/b> 1759\u20131769.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2017.1295865"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Hahn, J.<\/small> (1998). On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. <i>Econometrica<\/i> <b>66<\/b> 315\u2013331.","DOI":"10.2307\/2998560"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Hirano, K.<\/small>, <small>Imbens, G. W.<\/small> and <small>Ridder, G.<\/small> (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. <i>Econometrica<\/i> <b>71<\/b> 1161\u20131189.","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0262.00442"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>FIRPO, S.<\/small> (2007). Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects. <i>Econometrica<\/i> <b>75<\/b> 259\u2013276.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0262.2007.00738.x"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>CHERNOZHUKOV, V.<\/small>, <small>CHETVERIKOV, D.<\/small>, <small>DEMIRER, M.<\/small>, <small>DUFLO, E.<\/small>, <small>HANSEN, C.<\/small> and <small>NEWEY, W.<\/small> (2017). Double\/debiased\/Neyman machine learning of treatment effects. <i>Amer. Econ. Rev.<\/i> <b>107<\/b> 261\u2013265.","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.p20171038"},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>ABADIE, A.<\/small> and <small>IMBENS, G. W.<\/small> (2008). Estimation of the conditional variance in paired experiments. <i>Ann. \u00c9con. Stat.<\/i> <b>1<\/b> 175\u2013187.","DOI":"10.2307\/27917244"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>ANGRIST, J.<\/small> and <small>LAVY, V.<\/small> (2009). The effects of high stakes high school achievement awards: Evidence from a randomized trial. <i>Amer. Econ. Rev.<\/i> <b>99<\/b> 1384\u20131414.","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.99.4.1384"},{"key":"3","unstructured":"<small>ARMSTRONG, T. B.<\/small> (2022). Asymptotic efficiency bounds for a class of experimental designs. arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2205.02726\">2205.02726<\/a> [stat]."},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small> (2022). Optimality of matched-pair designs in randomized controlled trials. <i>Amer. Econ. Rev.<\/i> <b>112<\/b> 3911\u20133940.","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.20201856"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small>, <small>GUO, H.<\/small>, <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> and <small>TABORD-MEEHAN, M.<\/small> (2025). Inference in experiments with matched pairs and imperfect compliance. <i>J. Bus. Econom. Statist.<\/i> <b>43<\/b> 627\u2013642.","DOI":"10.1080\/07350015.2024.2416972"},{"key":"6","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small>, <small>HUANG, X.<\/small>, <small>ROMANO, J. P.<\/small>, <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> and <small>TABORD-MEEHAN, M.<\/small> (2025). A new design-based variance estimator for finely stratified experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2503.10851\">2503.10851<\/a>."},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small>, <small>JIANG, L.<\/small>, <small>ROMANO, J. P.<\/small>, <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> and <small>ZHANG, Y.<\/small> (2024). Covariate adjustment in experiments with matched pairs. <i>J. Econometrics<\/i> <b>241<\/b> Paper No. 105740, 17.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2024.105740"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small>, <small>LIU, J.<\/small>, <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> and <small>TABORD-MEEHAN, M.<\/small> (2024). Inference in cluster randomized trials with matched pairs. <i>J. Econometrics<\/i> <b>245<\/b> Paper No. 105873, 19.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2024.105873"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small>, <small>LIU, J.<\/small>, <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> and <small>TABORD-MEEHAN, M.<\/small> (2026). Supplement to \u201cOn the efficiency of highly stratified experiments.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2636SUPP\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2636SUPP<\/a>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-AOS2636SUPP"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small>, <small>LIU, J.<\/small> and <small>TABORD-MEEHAN, M.<\/small> (2024). Inference for matched tuples and fully blocked factorial designs. <i>Quant. Econ.<\/i> <b>15<\/b> 279\u2013330.","DOI":"10.3982\/qe2354"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BAI, Y.<\/small>, <small>ROMANO, J. P.<\/small> and <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> (2022). Inference in experiments with matched pairs. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>117<\/b> 1726\u20131737.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2021.1883437"},{"key":"12","unstructured":"<small>BANERJEE, A.<\/small>, <small>DUFLO, E.<\/small>, <small>GLENNERSTER, R.<\/small> and <small>KINNAN, C.<\/small> (2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. <i>Amer. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.<\/i> <b>7<\/b> 22\u201353."},{"key":"14","unstructured":"<small>BRUHN, M.<\/small>, <small>LE\u00c3O, L. D. S.<\/small>, <small>LEGOVINI, A.<\/small>, <small>MARCHETTI, R.<\/small> and <small>ZIA, B.<\/small> (2016). The impact of high school financial education: Evidence from a large-scale evaluation in Brazil. <i>Amer. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.<\/i> <b>8<\/b> 256\u2013295."},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>BRUHN, M.<\/small> and <small>MCKENZIE, D.<\/small> (2009). In pursuit of balance: Randomization in practice in development field experiments. <i>Amer. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.<\/i> <b>1<\/b> 200\u2013232.","DOI":"10.1257\/app.1.4.200"},{"key":"16","unstructured":"<small>BUGNI, F.<\/small>, <small>CANAY, I.<\/small>, <small>SHAIKH, A.<\/small> and <small>TABORD-MEEHAN, M.<\/small> (2022). Inference for cluster randomized experiments with non-ignorable cluster sizes. arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2204.08356\">2204.08356<\/a> [econ, stat]."},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>CAI, Y.<\/small> and <small>RAFI, A.<\/small> (2024). On the performance of the Neyman allocation with small pilots. <i>J. Econometrics<\/i> <b>242<\/b> Paper No. 105793, 20.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2024.105793"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>CASABURI, L.<\/small> and <small>REED, T.<\/small> (2022). Using individual-level randomized treatment to learn about market structure. <i>Amer. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.<\/i> <b>14<\/b> 58\u201390.","DOI":"10.1257\/app.20200306"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>CATTANEO, M. D.<\/small> (2010). Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability. <i>J. Econometrics<\/i> <b>155<\/b> 138\u2013154.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2009.09.023"},{"key":"24","unstructured":"<small>CHERNOZHUKOV, V.<\/small>, <small>CINELLI, C.<\/small>, <small>NEWEY, W.<\/small>, <small>SHARMA, A.<\/small> and <small>SYRGKANIS, V.<\/small> (2024). Long story short: Omitted variable bias in causal machine learning. arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2112.13398\">2112.13398<\/a> [cs, econ, stat]."},{"key":"25","unstructured":"<small>CYTRYNBAUM, M.<\/small> (2023). Designing representative and balanced experiments by local randomization. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2111.08157\">2111.08157<\/a>."},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>CYTRYNBAUM, M.<\/small> (2024). Covariate adjustment in stratified experiments. <i>Quant. Econ.<\/i> <b>15<\/b> 971\u2013998.","DOI":"10.3982\/qe2475"},{"key":"27","unstructured":"<small>CYTRYNBAUM, M.<\/small> (2024). Finely stratified rerandomization designs. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2407.03279\">2407.03279<\/a>."},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>IMAI, K.<\/small> (2008). Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design. <i>Stat. Med.<\/i> <b>27<\/b> 4857\u20134873.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3337"},{"key":"42","unstructured":"<small>IMBENS, G. W.<\/small> (2011). Experimental design for unit and cluster randomized trials. Technical Report."},{"key":"44","unstructured":"<small>JIANG, L.<\/small>, <small>LINTON, O. B.<\/small>, <small>TANG, H.<\/small> and <small>ZHANG, Y.<\/small> (2022). Improving estimation efficiency via regression-adjustment in covariate-adaptive randomizations with imperfect compliance. arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2201.13004\">2201.13004<\/a> [econ, stat]."},{"key":"45","unstructured":"<small>JIANG, L.<\/small>, <small>LIU, X.<\/small>, <small>PHILLIPS, P. C.<\/small> and <small>ZHANG, Y.<\/small> (2021). Bootstrap inference for quantile treatment effects in randomized experiments with matched pairs. <i>Rev. Econ. Stat.<\/i> 1\u201347."},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>JIANG, L.<\/small>, <small>PHILLIPS, P. C. B.<\/small>, <small>TAO, Y.<\/small> and <small>ZHANG, Y.<\/small> (2023). Regression-adjusted estimation of quantile treatment effects under covariate-adaptive randomizations. <i>J. Econometrics<\/i> <b>234<\/b> 758\u2013776.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2022.08.010"},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>LEHMANN, E. L.<\/small> and <small>ROMANO, J. P.<\/small> (2021). <i>Testing Statistical Hypotheses<\/i>. <i>Springer Texts in Statistics<\/i>. Springer, Cham. Fourth edition [of 0107933].","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-70578-7"},{"key":"51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>LI, X.<\/small>, <small>DING, P.<\/small> and <small>RUBIN, D. B.<\/small> (2020). Rerandomization in <math xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" overflow=\"scroll\" id=\"eq_1\"><msup><mrow><mn>2<\/mn><\/mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant=\"italic\">K<\/mi><\/mrow><\/msup><\/math> factorial experiments. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>48<\/b> 43\u201363.","DOI":"10.1214\/18-AOS1790"},{"key":"58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>POCOCK, S. J.<\/small> and <small>SIMON, R.<\/small> (1975). Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. <i>Biometrics<\/i> 103\u2013115.","DOI":"10.2307\/2529712"},{"key":"59","unstructured":"<small>RAFI, A.<\/small> (2023). Efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects under covariate adaptive randomization. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2305.08340\">2305.08340<\/a>."},{"key":"64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>VAN DER VAART, A. W.<\/small> and <small>WELLNER, J.<\/small> (1996). <i>Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes<\/i>: <i>With Applications to Statistics<\/i>. <i>Springer Series in Statistics<\/i>. Springer-Verlag, New York.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-2545-2"},{"key":"65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>WEI, L. J.<\/small> (1978). The adaptive biased coin design for sequential experiments. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>6<\/b> 92\u2013100.","DOI":"10.1214\/aos\/1176344068"},{"key":"66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>YE, T.<\/small>, <small>YI, Y.<\/small> and <small>SHAO, J.<\/small> (2022). Inference on the average treatment effect under minimization and other covariate-adaptive randomization methods. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>109<\/b> 33\u201347.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asab015"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BUGNI, F. A.<\/small>, <small>CANAY, I. A.<\/small> and <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> (2018). Inference under covariate-adaptive randomization. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>113<\/b> 1784\u20131796.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2017.1375934"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BUGNI, F. A.<\/small>, <small>CANAY, I. A.<\/small> and <small>SHAIKH, A. M.<\/small> (2019). Inference under covariate-adaptive randomization with multiple treatments. <i>Quant. Econ.<\/i> <b>10<\/b> 1747\u20131785.","DOI":"10.3982\/qe1150"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>HU, Y.<\/small> and <small>HU, F.<\/small> (2012). Asymptotic properties of covariate-adaptive randomization. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>40<\/b> 1794\u20131815.","DOI":"10.1214\/12-AOS983"},{"key":"55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>MA, W.<\/small>, <small>QIN, Y.<\/small>, <small>LI, Y.<\/small> and <small>HU, F.<\/small> (2020). Statistical inference for covariate-adaptive randomization procedures. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>115<\/b> 1488\u20131497.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2019.1635483"},{"key":"67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>ZELEN, M.<\/small> (1974). The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials. <i>J. Chronic Dis.<\/i> <b>27<\/b> 365\u2013375.","DOI":"10.1016\/0021-9681(74)90015-0"},{"key":"54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>MA, W.<\/small>, <small>LI, P.<\/small>, <small>ZHANG, L.-X.<\/small> and <small>HU, F.<\/small> (2024). A new and unified family of covariate adaptive randomization procedures and their properties. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>119<\/b> 151\u2013162.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2022.2102986"}],"container-title":["The Annals of Statistics"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:12:20Z","timestamp":1791321140000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/annals-of-statistics\/volume-54\/issue-4\/On-the-efficiency-of-highly-stratified-experiments\/10.1214\/26-AOS2636.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-aos2636","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-5364","2168-8966"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-5364","type":"print"},{"value":"2168-8966","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]}}}