{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T00:39:41Z","timestamp":1791851981674,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Institute of Mathematical Statistics","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann. Statist."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper investigates the theoretical foundation and develops analytical formulas for sample size and power calculations for causal inference with observational data. By analyzing the variance of an inverse probability weighting estimator of the average treatment effect, we decompose the power calculation into three components: propensity score distribution, potential outcome distribution and their correlation. We show that to determine the minimal sample size of an observational study, in addition to the standard inputs in the power calculation of randomized trials, it is sufficient to have two parameters: an overlap coefficient and a confounding coefficient, which quantify the strength of the confounder-treatment and the confounder-outcome association, respectively. For the overlap coefficient, we propose using the Bhattacharyya coefficient, which measures the covariate overlap and, together with the treatment proportion, leads to a uniquely identifiable and easily computable propensity score distribution. For the confounding coefficient, we propose a sensitivity parameter bounded by the R-squared statistic of the regression of the outcome on covariates. Our procedure relies on a parametric propensity score model and a semiparametric restricted mean outcome model, but does not require distributional assumptions on the multivariate covariates. We develop an associated R package PSpower and an online calculator.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-aos2649","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T08:22:00Z","timestamp":1787041320000},"page":"2191-2208","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Sample size and power calculations for causal inference in observational studies"],"prefix":"10.1214","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0949-7565","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bo","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Statistical Science, Duke University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6759-0725","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chengxin","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0390-3673","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fan","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Statistical Science, Duke University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"108","reference":[{"key":"4","unstructured":"<small>BILLINGSLEY, P.<\/small> (1995). <i>Probability and Measure<\/i>, 3rd ed. <i>Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics<\/i>. Wiley, New York. A Wiley-Interscience Publication."},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>LI, X.<\/small>, <small>DING, P.<\/small> and <small>RUBIN, D. B.<\/small> (2018). Asymptotic theory of rerandomization in treatment-control experiments. <i>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<\/i> <b>115<\/b> 9157\u20139162.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1808191115"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>DING, P.<\/small>, <small>FELLER, A.<\/small> and <small>MIRATRIX, L.<\/small> (2016). Randomization inference for treatment effect variation. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>78<\/b> 655\u2013671.","DOI":"10.1111\/rssb.12124"},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>AITCHISON, J.<\/small> and <small>SHEN, S. M.<\/small> (1980). Logistic-normal distributions: Some properties and uses. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>67<\/b> 261\u2013272.","DOI":"10.2307\/2335470"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Rosenbaum, P. R.<\/small> and <small>Rubin, D. B.<\/small> (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>70<\/b> 41\u201355.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/70.1.41"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>Rubin, D. B.<\/small> (1980). Randomization analysis of experimental data: The Fisher randomization test comment. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>75<\/b> 591\u2013593.","DOI":"10.2307\/2287653"},{"key":"27","unstructured":"<small>Tsiatis, A. A.<\/small> (2006). <i>Semiparametric Theory and Missing Data<\/i>. <i>Springer Series in Statistics<\/i>. Springer, New York."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>Robins, J. M.<\/small>, <small>Rotnitzky, A.<\/small> and <small>Zhao, L. P.<\/small> (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>89<\/b> 846\u2013866.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1994.10476818"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Li, F.<\/small>, <small>Morgan, K. L.<\/small> and <small>Zaslavsky, A. M.<\/small> (2018). Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>113<\/b> 390\u2013400.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2016.1260466"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Lunceford, J. K.<\/small> and <small>Davidian, M.<\/small> (2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. <i>Stat. Med.<\/i> <b>23<\/b> 2937\u20132960.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1903"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>DING, P.<\/small>, <small>FELLER, A.<\/small> and <small>MIRATRIX, L.<\/small> (2019). Decomposing treatment effect variation. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>114<\/b> 304\u2013317.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2017.1407322"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>YANG, S.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2018). Asymptotic inference of causal effects with observational studies trimmed by the estimated propensity scores. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>105<\/b> 487\u2013493.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asy008"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BENTKUS, V.<\/small> (2005). A Lyapunov type bound in <math xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" overflow=\"scroll\" id=\"eq_2\"><msup><mrow><mi mathvariant=\"italic\">R<\/mi><\/mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant=\"italic\">d<\/mi><\/mrow><\/msup><\/math>. <i>Teor. Veroyatn. Primen.<\/i> <b>49<\/b> 311\u2013323.","DOI":"10.1137\/S0040585X97981123"},{"key":"3","unstructured":"<small>BHATTACHARYYA, A.<\/small> (1943). On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. <i>Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc.<\/i> <b>35<\/b> 99\u2013110."},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BRANSON, Z.<\/small> and <small>DASGUPTA, T.<\/small> (2020). Sampling-based randomised designs for causal inference under the potential outcomes framework. <i>Int. Stat. Rev.<\/i> <b>88<\/b> 101\u2013121.","DOI":"10.1111\/insr.12339"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BRANSON, Z.<\/small>, <small>LI, X.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2024). Power and sample size calculations for rerandomization. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>111<\/b> 355\u2013363.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asad027"},{"key":"7","unstructured":"<small>CHOW, S.-C.<\/small>, <small>SHAO, J.<\/small>, <small>WANG, H.<\/small> and <small>LOKHNYGINA, Y.<\/small> (2018). <i>Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research<\/i>. <i>Chapman &amp; Hall\/CRC Biostatistics Series<\/i>. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Third edition of [MR2356591]."},{"key":"8","unstructured":"<small>CONNORS, A. F.<\/small>, <small>SPEROFF, T.<\/small>, <small>DAWSON, N. V.<\/small>, <small>THOMAS, C.<\/small>, <small>HARRELL, F. E.<\/small>, <small>WAGNER, D.<\/small>, <small>DESBIENS, N.<\/small>, <small>GOLDMAN, L.<\/small>, <small>WU, A. W.<\/small> et al. (1996). The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. <i>J. Amer. Med. Assoc.<\/i> <b>276<\/b> 889\u2013897."},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>HERN\u00c1N, M. A.<\/small> (2022). Causal analyses of existing databases: No power calculations required. <i>J. Clin. Epidemiol.<\/i> <b>144<\/b> 203\u2013205.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2021.08.028"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>HSIEH, F.<\/small> and <small>LAVORI, P. W.<\/small> (2000). Sample-size calculations for the Cox proportional hazards regression model with nonbinary covariates. <i>Control. Clin. Trials<\/i> <b>21<\/b> 552\u2013560.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0197-2456(00)00104-5"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>INMAN, H. F.<\/small> and <small>BRADLEY, E. L. JR.<\/small> (1989). The overlapping coefficient as a measure of agreement between probability distributions and point estimation of the overlap of two normal densities. <i>Comm. Statist. Theory Methods<\/i> <b>18<\/b> 3851\u20133874.","DOI":"10.1080\/03610928908830127"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>KELCEY, B.<\/small>, <small>DONG, N.<\/small>, <small>SPYBROOK, J.<\/small> and <small>COX, K.<\/small> (2017). Statistical power for causally defined indirect effects in group-randomized trials with individual-level mediators. <i>J. Educ. Behav. Stat.<\/i> <b>42<\/b> 499\u2013530.","DOI":"10.3102\/1076998617695506"},{"key":"16","unstructured":"<small>LI, F.<\/small>, <small>THOMAS, L. E.<\/small> and <small>LI, F.<\/small> (2019). Addressing extreme propensity scores via the overlap weights. <i>Amer. J. Epidemiol.<\/i> <b>188<\/b> 250\u2013257."},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>LIU, B.<\/small>, <small>YANG, C.<\/small> and <small>LI, F.<\/small> (2026). Supplement to \u201cSample size and power calculations for causal inference in observational studies.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2649SUPP\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2649SUPP<\/a>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-AOS2649SUPP"},{"key":"20","unstructured":"<small>MUKHERJEE, S.<\/small>, <small>TAMAYO, P.<\/small>, <small>ROGERS, S.<\/small>, <small>RIFKIN, R.<\/small>, <small>ENGLE, A.<\/small>, <small>CAMPBELL, C.<\/small>, <small>GOLUB, T. R.<\/small> and <small>MESIROV, J. P.<\/small> (2003). Estimating dataset size requirements for classifying DNA microarray data. <i>J. Comput. Biol.<\/i> <b>10<\/b> 119\u2013142."},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>QIN, X.<\/small> (2024). Sample size and power calculations for causal mediation analysis: A tutorial and shiny app. <i>Behav. Res. Methods<\/i> <b>56<\/b> 1738\u20131769.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-023-02118-0"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>RAUDENBUSH, S. W.<\/small> (1997). Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomised trials. <i>Psychol. Methods<\/i> <b>2<\/b> 173\u2013185.","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.2.2.173"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>SHOOK-SA, B. E.<\/small> and <small>HUDGENS, M. G.<\/small> (2022). Power and sample size for observational studies of point exposure effects. <i>Biometrics<\/i> <b>78<\/b> 388\u2013398.","DOI":"10.1111\/biom.13405"},{"key":"28","unstructured":"<small>YANG, C.<\/small>, <small>LIU, B.<\/small> and <small>LI, F.<\/small> (2026). Sample size and power calculations for causal inference with time-to-event outcomes. arXiv preprint. Available at arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2605.10088\">2605.10088<\/a>."}],"container-title":["The Annals of Statistics"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:12:31Z","timestamp":1791321151000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/annals-of-statistics\/volume-54\/issue-4\/Sample-size-and-power-calculations-for-causal-inference-in-observational\/10.1214\/26-AOS2649.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-aos2649","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-5364","2168-8966"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-5364","type":"print"},{"value":"2168-8966","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]]}}}