{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:50:26Z","timestamp":1791323426377,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Institute of Mathematical Statistics","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann. Statist."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The problem of estimating the slope parameter in regression between two spatial processes under confounding by an unmeasured spatial process has received widespread attention in the recent statistical literature. Yet, a fundamental question remains unresolved: when is this slope consistently estimable under spatial confounding, with existing insights being largely empirical or estimator-specific. In this manuscript, we characterize conditions for consistent estimability of the regression slope between Gaussian random fields (GRFs), the common stochastic model for spatial processes, under spatial confounding. Under fixed-domain (infill) asymptotics, we give sufficient conditions for consistent estimability in terms of the smoothness or local behavior of the exposure and confounder processes. When estimability holds, we provide consistent estimators of the slope using local differencing (taking discrete differences or Laplacians of the processes of suitable order). Using functional analysis results on Paley\u2013Wiener spaces, we then provide an easy-to-verify necessary condition for consistent estimability of the slope in terms of the relative spectral tail decays of the confounder and exposure. As a by-product, we establish a novel and general spectral condition on the equivalence of measures on the paths of multivariate GRFs with component fields of varying smoothnesses, a result of independent importance. Our estimability results or estimators do not rely on specific parametric models for the covariance functions. We show that for many covariance classes like the Mat\u00e9rn, power-exponential, generalized Cauchy and coregionalization families, the necessary and sufficient conditions become identical, except for a boundary point, thereby providing a sharp characterization of consistent estimability of the slope for these processes. The results are extended to multivariate slopes and to accommodate measurement error using local-averaging-and-differencing-based estimators. We show that differencing-based estimation remains consistent for popular classes of nonstationary Gaussian random fields, some non-Gaussian random fields and irregular designs. The finite sample behavior of the estimators is explored via numerical experiments.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-aos2650","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T12:51:15Z","timestamp":1790945475000},"page":"2406-2431","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Infill consistent estimability of the regression slope between Gaussian random fields under spatial confounding"],"prefix":"10.1214","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5046-0289","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Abhirup","family":"Datta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael L.","family":"Stein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Statistics, Rutgers University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"108","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ANDERES, E.<\/small> (2010). On the consistent separation of scale and variance for Gaussian random fields. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>38<\/b> 870\u2013893.","DOI":"10.1214\/09-AOS725"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>TANG, W.<\/small>, <small>ZHANG, L.<\/small> and <small>BANERJEE, S.<\/small> (2021). On identifiability and consistency of the nugget in Gaussian spatial process models. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>83<\/b> 1044\u20131070.","DOI":"10.1111\/rssb.12472"},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>WANG, W.<\/small>, <small>TUO, R.<\/small> and <small>WU, C. F. J.<\/small> (2020). On prediction properties of kriging: Uniform error bounds and robustness. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>115<\/b> 920\u2013930.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2019.1598868"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>PAPADOGEORGOU, G.<\/small>, <small>CHOIRAT, C.<\/small> and <small>ZIGLER, C. M.<\/small> (2019). Adjusting for unmeasured spatial confounding with distance adjusted propensity score matching. <i>Biostatistics<\/i> <b>20<\/b> 256\u2013272.","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/kxx074"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Paciorek, C. J.<\/small> and <small>Schervish, M. J.<\/small> (2006). Spatial modelling using a new class of nonstationary covariance functions. <i>Environmetrics<\/i> <b>17<\/b> 483\u2013506.","DOI":"10.1002\/env.785"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>SKOROKHOD, A. V.<\/small> and <small>YADRENKO, M. I.<\/small> (1973). On absolute continuity of measures corresponding to homogeneous Gaussian fields. <i>Theory Probab. Appl.<\/i> <b>18<\/b> 27\u201340.","DOI":"10.1137\/1118002"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>HODGES, J. S.<\/small> and <small>REICH, B. J.<\/small> (2010). Adding spatially-correlated errors can mess up the fixed effect you love. <i>Amer. Statist.<\/i> <b>64<\/b> 325\u2013334.","DOI":"10.1198\/tast.2010.10052"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>SAMPSON, P. D.<\/small> and <small>GUTTORP, P.<\/small> (1992). Nonparametric estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>87<\/b> 108\u2013119.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1992.10475181"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Da Prato, G.<\/small> and <small>Zabczyk, J.<\/small> (2014). <i>Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions<\/i>, 2nd ed. <i>Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications<\/i> <b>152<\/b>. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107295513"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Gneiting, T.<\/small>, <small>Kleiber, W.<\/small> and <small>Schlather, M.<\/small> (2010). Mat\u00e9rn cross-covariance functions for multivariate random fields. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>105<\/b> 1167\u20131177.","DOI":"10.1198\/jasa.2010.tm09420"},{"key":"48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Zhang, H.<\/small> (2004). Inconsistent estimation and asymptotically equal interpolations in model-based geostatistics. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>99<\/b> 250\u2013261.","DOI":"10.1198\/016214504000000241"},{"key":"42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>WAKEFIELD, J.<\/small> (2007). Disease mapping and spatial regression with count data. <i>Biostatistics<\/i> <b>8<\/b> 158\u2013183.","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/kxl008"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BACHOC, F.<\/small>, <small>PORCU, E.<\/small>, <small>BEVILACQUA, M.<\/small>, <small>FURRER, R.<\/small> and <small>FAOUZI, T.<\/small> (2022). Asymptotically equivalent prediction in multivariate geostatistics. <i>Bernoulli<\/i> <b>28<\/b> 2518\u20132545.","DOI":"10.3150\/21-bej1427"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>GNEITING, T.<\/small> and <small>SCHLATHER, M.<\/small> (2004). Stochastic models that separate fractal dimension and the Hurst effect. <i>SIAM Rev.<\/i> <b>46<\/b> 269\u2013282.","DOI":"10.1137\/S0036144501394387"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>KLEIBER, W.<\/small> and <small>NYCHKA, D.<\/small> (2012). Nonstationary modeling for multivariate spatial processes. <i>J. Multivariate Anal.<\/i> <b>112<\/b> 76\u201391.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmva.2012.05.011"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>APANASOVICH, T.<\/small> and <small>GENTON, M. G.<\/small> (2010). Cross-covariance functions for multivariate random fields based on latent dimensions. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>97<\/b> 15\u201330.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asp078"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>CLAYTON, D. G.<\/small>, <small>BERNARDINELLI, L.<\/small> and <small>MONTOMOLI, C.<\/small> (1993). Spatial correlation in ecological analysis. <i>Int. J. Epidemiol.<\/i> <b>22<\/b> 1193\u20131202.","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/22.6.1193"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>HANKS, E. M.<\/small>, <small>SCHLIEP, E. M.<\/small>, <small>HOOTEN, M. B.<\/small> and <small>HOETING, J. A.<\/small> (2015). Restricted spatial regression in practice: Geostatistical models, confounding, and robustness under model misspecification. <i>Environmetrics<\/i> <b>26<\/b> 243\u2013254.","DOI":"10.1002\/env.2331"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>KHAN, K.<\/small> and <small>CALDER, C. A.<\/small> (2022). Restricted spatial regression methods: Implications for inference. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>117<\/b> 482\u2013494.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2020.1788949"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>NOBRE, W. S.<\/small>, <small>SCHMIDT, A. M.<\/small> and <small>PEREIRA, J. B. M.<\/small> (2021). On the effects of spatial confounding in hierarchical models. <i>Int. Stat. Rev.<\/i> <b>89<\/b> 302\u2013322.","DOI":"10.1111\/insr.12407"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>PACIOREK, C. J.<\/small> (2010). The importance of scale for spatial-confounding bias and precision of spatial regression estimators. <i>Statist. Sci.<\/i> <b>25<\/b> 107\u2013125.","DOI":"10.1214\/10-STS326"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>PAGE, G. L.<\/small>, <small>LIU, Y.<\/small>, <small>HE, Z.<\/small> and <small>SUN, D.<\/small> (2017). Estimation and prediction in the presence of spatial confounding for spatial linear models. <i>Scand. J. Stat.<\/i> <b>44<\/b> 780\u2013797.","DOI":"10.1111\/sjos.12275"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>REICH, B. J.<\/small>, <small>HODGES, J. S.<\/small> and <small>ZADNIK, V.<\/small> (2006). Effects of residual smoothing on the posterior of the fixed effects in disease-mapping models. <i>Biometrics<\/i> <b>62<\/b> 1197\u20131206.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1541-0420.2006.00617.x"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>THADEN, H.<\/small> and <small>KNEIB, T.<\/small> (2018). Structural equation models for dealing with spatial confounding. <i>Amer. Statist.<\/i> <b>72<\/b> 239\u2013252.","DOI":"10.1080\/00031305.2017.1305290"},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ZIMMERMAN, D. L.<\/small> and <small>VER HOEF, J. M.<\/small> (2022). On deconfounding spatial confounding in linear models. <i>Amer. Statist.<\/i> <b>76<\/b> 159\u2013167.","DOI":"10.1080\/00031305.2021.1946149"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>GUAN, Y.<\/small>, <small>PAGE, G. L.<\/small>, <small>REICH, B. J.<\/small>, <small>VENTRUCCI, M.<\/small> and <small>YANG, S.<\/small> (2023). Spectral adjustment for spatial confounding. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>110<\/b> 699\u2013719.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asac069"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BINGHAM, N. H.<\/small> (1972). A Tauberian theorem for integral transforms of Hankel type. <i>J. Lond. Math. Soc<\/i>. (2) <b>5<\/b> 493\u2013503.","DOI":"10.1112\/jlms\/s2-5.3.493"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BOLIN, D.<\/small> and <small>WALLIN, J.<\/small> (2026). Spatial self-confounding: Smoothness-related estimation bias in spatial regression models. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>113<\/b> Paper No. asaf076, 18.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asaf076"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>DATTA, A.<\/small> and <small>STEIN, M. L.<\/small> (2026). Supplement to \u201cInfill consistent estimability of the regression slope between Gaussian random fields under spatial confounding.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2650SUPP\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2650SUPP<\/a>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-AOS2650SUPP"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>DRUCKENMILLER, H.<\/small> and <small>HSIANG, S.<\/small> (2018). Accounting for unobservable heterogeneity in cross section using spatial first differences. NBER Working Paper No. 2517. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.","DOI":"10.3386\/w25177"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>DUPONT, E.<\/small>, <small>WOOD, S. N.<\/small> and <small>AUGUSTIN, N. H.<\/small> (2022). Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding. <i>Biometrics<\/i> <b>78<\/b> 1279\u20131290.","DOI":"10.1111\/biom.13656"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>GARONI, T. M.<\/small> and <small>FRANKEL, N. E.<\/small> (2002). L\u00e9vy flights: Exact results and asymptotics beyond all orders. <i>J. Math. Phys.<\/i> <b>43<\/b> 2670\u20132689.","DOI":"10.1063\/1.1467095"},{"key":"13","unstructured":"<small>GILBERT, B.<\/small>, <small>DATTA, A.<\/small>, <small>CASEY, J. A.<\/small> and <small>OGBURN, E. L.<\/small> (2021). A causal inference framework for spatial confounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2112.14946\">2112.14946<\/a>."},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>GILBERT, B.<\/small>, <small>OGBURN, E. L.<\/small> and <small>DATTA, A.<\/small> (2025). Consistency of common spatial estimators under spatial confounding. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>112<\/b> Paper No. asae070, 13.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asae070"},{"key":"20","unstructured":"<small>IBRAGIMOV, I. A.<\/small> and <small>ROZANOV, Y. A.<\/small> (2012). <i>Gaussian Random Processes<\/i>. Springer Science &amp; Business Media."},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>IOSEVICH, A.<\/small> and <small>MAYELI, A.<\/small> (2015). Exponential bases, Paley\u2013Wiener spaces and applications. <i>J. Funct. Anal.<\/i> <b>268<\/b> 363\u2013375.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfa.2014.10.006"},{"key":"22","unstructured":"<small>KANAGAWA, M.<\/small>, <small>HENNIG, P.<\/small>, <small>SEJDINOVIC, D.<\/small> and <small>SRIPERUMBUDUR, B. K.<\/small> (2018). Gaussian processes and kernel methods: A review on connections and equivalences. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1807.02582\">1807.02582<\/a>."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>KHAN, K.<\/small> and <small>BERRETT, C.<\/small> (2026). Re-thinking spatial confounding in spatial linear mixed models. <i>Statist. Sci.<\/i> <b>41<\/b> 411\u2013432.","DOI":"10.1214\/25-STS976"},{"key":"26","unstructured":"<small>LI, D.<\/small>, <small>TANG, W.<\/small> and <small>BANERJEE, S.<\/small> (2023). Inference for Gaussian processes with Mat\u00e9rn covariogram on compact Riemannian manifolds. <i>J. Mach. Learn. Res.<\/i> <b>24<\/b> Paper No. [101], 26."},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>LIM, S. C.<\/small> and <small>TEO, L. P.<\/small> (2009). Gaussian fields and Gaussian sheets with generalized Cauchy covariance structure. <i>Stoch. Process. Appl.<\/i> <b>119<\/b> 1325\u20131356.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spa.2008.06.011"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>NOLAN, J. P.<\/small> (2020). <i>Univariate Stable Distributions<\/i>: <i>Models for Heavy Tailed Data<\/i>. <i>Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering<\/i>. Springer, Cham.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-52915-4"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>RUIZ-MEDINA, M.<\/small> and <small>PORCU, E.<\/small> (2015). Equivalence of Gaussian measures of multivariate random fields. <i>Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.<\/i> <b>29<\/b> 325\u2013334.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00477-014-0926-z"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>STEIN, M. L.<\/small> (1999). <i>Interpolation of Spatial Data<\/i>. <i>Springer Series in Statistics<\/i>. Springer, New York. Some theory for Kriging.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-1494-6"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>WACKERNAGEL, H.<\/small> (2003). <i>Multivariate Geostatistics<\/i>: <i>An Introduction with Applications<\/i>, 3rd ed. Springer, Berlin.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-05294-5_1"},{"key":"44","unstructured":"<small>WOODWARD, S. M.<\/small>, <small>TEC, M.<\/small> and <small>DOMINICI, F.<\/small> (2024). An instrumental variables framework to unite spatial confounding methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2411.10381\">2411.10381<\/a>."},{"key":"45","unstructured":"<small>WU, K. L.<\/small> and <small>BANERJEE, S.<\/small> (2025). Spatial confounding in multivariate areal data analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2505.07232\">2505.07232<\/a>."},{"key":"46","unstructured":"<small>YU, N.<\/small> (2022). <i>Parametric Estimation in Spatial Regression Models<\/i>. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI. Thesis (Ph.D.)\u2013University of Maryland, College Park."},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ZAMMIT-MANGION, A.<\/small>, <small>NG, T. L. J.<\/small>, <small>VU, Q.<\/small> and <small>FILIPPONE, M.<\/small> (2022). Deep compositional spatial models. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>117<\/b> 1787\u20131808.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2021.1887741"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ZOLOTAREV, V. M.<\/small> (1986). <i>One-Dimensional Stable Distributions<\/i>. <i>Translations of Mathematical Monographs<\/i> <b>65<\/b>. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI. Translated from the Russian by H. H. McFaden, Translation edited by Ben Silver.","DOI":"10.1090\/mmono\/065"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>GELFAND, A. E.<\/small> and <small>VOUNATSOU, P.<\/small> (2003). Proper multivariate conditional autoregressive models for spatial data analysis. <i>Biostatistics<\/i> <b>4<\/b> 11\u201315.","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/4.1.11"}],"container-title":["The Annals of Statistics"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:05:37Z","timestamp":1791320737000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/annals-of-statistics\/volume-54\/issue-5\/Infill-consistent-estimability-of-the-regression-slope-between-Gaussian-random\/10.1214\/26-AOS2650.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-aos2650","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-5364","2168-8966"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-5364","type":"print"},{"value":"2168-8966","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]}}}