{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:50:51Z","timestamp":1791323451775,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Institute of Mathematical Statistics","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann. Statist."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Crossover designs randomly assign each unit to receive a sequence of treatments. By comparing outcomes within the same unit, these designs can effectively eliminate between-unit variation and facilitate the identification of both instantaneous effects of current treatments and carryover effects from past treatments. They are widely used in traditional biomedical studies and are increasingly adopted in modern digital platforms. However, standard analyses of crossover designs often rely on strong parametric models, making inference vulnerable to model misspecification. This paper adopts the design-based framework to analyze general crossover designs. We make two main contributions. First, we use potential outcomes to formally define the causal estimands and assumptions on the data-generating process. For any given type of crossover design and assumptions on potential outcomes, we outline a procedure for identification and estimation, emphasizing the central role of the treatment assignment mechanism in the design-based inference. Second, we unify the analysis of crossover designs using least squares, with restrictions on the coefficients and weights on the units. Based on the theory, we recommend the specification of the regression function, weighting scheme, and coefficient restrictions to assess identifiability, construct efficient estimators, and conduct inference in a unified fashion. Crucially, the least squares procedure is simple to implement, and yields not only consistent and efficient point estimates but also valid inference even when the working regression model is misspecified.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-aos2663","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T12:55:28Z","timestamp":1790945728000},"page":"2614-2636","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Principled analysis of crossover designs: Causal effects, efficient estimation and robust inference"],"prefix":"10.1214","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"Zhichao","family":"Jiang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2704-2353","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Peng","family":"Ding","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"108","reference":[{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>FOGARTY, C. B.<\/small> (2018). Regression-assisted inference for the average treatment effect in paired experiments. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>105<\/b> 994\u20131000.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asy034"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>FREEDMAN, D. A.<\/small> (2008). Randomization does not justify logistic regression. <i>Statist. Sci.<\/i> <b>23<\/b> 237\u2013249.","DOI":"10.1214\/08-STS262"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>LI, X.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2020). Rerandomization and regression adjustment. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>82<\/b> 241\u2013268.","DOI":"10.1111\/rssb.12353"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>Liang, K.-Y.<\/small> and <small>Zeger, S. L.<\/small> (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>73<\/b> 13\u201322.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/73.1.13"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BLONIARZ, A.<\/small>, <small>LIU, H.<\/small>, <small>ZHANG, C.-H.<\/small>, <small>SEKHON, J. S.<\/small> and <small>YU, B.<\/small> (2016). Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments. <i>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA<\/i> <b>113<\/b> 7383\u20137390.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1510506113"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BOJINOV, I.<\/small> and <small>SHEPHARD, N.<\/small> (2019). Time series experiments and causal estimands: Exact randomization tests and trading. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>114<\/b> 1665\u20131682.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2018.1527225"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>FREEDMAN, D. A.<\/small> (2008). On regression adjustments to experimental data. <i>Adv. in Appl. Math.<\/i> <b>40<\/b> 180\u2013193.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aam.2006.12.003"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>IMAI, K.<\/small>, <small>JIANG, Z.<\/small> and <small>MALANI, A.<\/small> (2021). Causal inference with interference and noncompliance in two-stage randomized experiments. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>116<\/b> 632\u2013644.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2020.1775612"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>LIU, H.<\/small> and <small>YANG, Y.<\/small> (2020). Regression-adjusted average treatment effect estimates in stratified randomized experiments. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>107<\/b> 935\u2013948.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asaa038"},{"key":"45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>PASHLEY, N. E.<\/small> and <small>MIRATRIX, L. W.<\/small> (2021). Insights on variance estimation for blocked and matched pairs designs. <i>J. Educ. Behav. Stat.<\/i> <b>46<\/b> 271\u2013296.","DOI":"10.3102\/1076998620946272"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>IMBENS, G. W.<\/small> and <small>RUBIN, D. B.<\/small> (2015). <i>Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences<\/i>. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139025751"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ATHEY, S.<\/small> and <small>IMBENS, G. W.<\/small> (2022). Design-based analysis in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption. <i>J. Econometrics<\/i> <b>226<\/b> 62\u201379.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeconom.2020.10.012"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>COCHRAN, W.<\/small> (1939). Long-term agricultural experiments. <i>Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc.<\/i> <b>6<\/b> 104\u2013148.","DOI":"10.2307\/2983686"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Lin, W.<\/small> (2013). Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman\u2019s critique. <i>Ann. Appl. Stat.<\/i> <b>7<\/b> 295\u2013318.","DOI":"10.1214\/12-AOAS583"},{"key":"56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>Zellner, A.<\/small> (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>57<\/b> 348\u2013368.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1962.10480664"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>Li, X.<\/small> and <small>Ding, P.<\/small> (2017). General forms of finite population central limit theorems with applications to causal inference. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>112<\/b> 1759\u20131769.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2017.1295865"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>DASGUPTA, T.<\/small>, <small>PILLAI, N. S.<\/small> and <small>RUBIN, D. B.<\/small> (2015). Causal inference from <math xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" overflow=\"scroll\" id=\"eq_2\"><msup><mrow><mn>2<\/mn><\/mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant=\"italic\">K<\/mi><\/mrow><\/msup><\/math> factorial designs by using potential outcomes. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>77<\/b> 727\u2013753.","DOI":"10.1111\/rssb.12085"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>GUO, K.<\/small> and <small>BASSE, G.<\/small> (2023). The generalized Oaxaca\u2013Blinder estimator. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>118<\/b> 524\u2013536.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2021.1941053"},{"key":"58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ZHAO, A.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2022). Regression-based causal inference with factorial experiments: Estimands, model specifications and design-based properties. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>109<\/b> 799\u2013815.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asab051"},{"key":"59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>ZHAO, A.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2023). Covariate adjustment in multiarmed, possibly factorial experiments. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>85<\/b> 1\u201323.","DOI":"10.1093\/jrsssb\/qkac003"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>BOJINOV, I.<\/small>, <small>RAMBACHAN, A.<\/small> and <small>SHEPHARD, N.<\/small> (2021). Panel experiments and dynamic causal effects: A finite population perspective. <i>Quant. Econ.<\/i> <b>12<\/b> 1171\u20131196.","DOI":"10.3982\/qe1744"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"<small>JIANG, Z.<\/small>, <small>CHEN, S.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2023). An instrumental variable method for point processes: Generalized Wald estimation based on deconvolution. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>110<\/b> 989\u20131008.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asad005"},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>ARKHANGELSKY, D.<\/small> and <small>IMBENS, G.<\/small> (2024). Causal models for longitudinal and panel data: A survey. <i>Econom. J.<\/i> <b>27<\/b> C1\u2013C61.","DOI":"10.1093\/ectj\/utae014"},{"key":"3","unstructured":"<small>BALAAM, L.<\/small> (1968). A two-period design with <math xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" overflow=\"scroll\" id=\"eq_1\"><msup><mrow><mi mathvariant=\"italic\">t<\/mi><\/mrow><mrow><mn>2<\/mn><\/mrow><\/msup><\/math> experimental units. <i>Biometrics<\/i> <b>24<\/b> 61\u201373."},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>BASSE, G. W.<\/small>, <small>DING, Y.<\/small> and <small>TOULIS, P.<\/small> (2023). Minimax designs for causal effects in temporal experiments with treatment habituation. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>110<\/b> 155\u2013168.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/asac024"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>BOJINOV, I.<\/small>, <small>SIMCHI-LEVI, D.<\/small> and <small>ZHAO, J.<\/small> (2023). Design and analysis of switchback experiments. <i>Manag. Sci.<\/i> <b>69<\/b> 3759\u20133777.","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2022.4583"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>BROWN, B. W. JR<\/small> (1980). The crossover experiment for clinical trials. <i>Biometrics<\/i> <b>36<\/b> 69\u201379.","DOI":"10.2307\/2530496"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>COCHRAN, W. G.<\/small> and <small>COX, G. M.<\/small> (1950). <i>Experimental Designs<\/i>. Wiley, NJ.","DOI":"10.1097\/00010694-195008000-00014"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>COOK, T. D.<\/small> and <small>DEMETS, D. L.<\/small> (2007). <i>Introduction to Statistical Methods for Clinical Trials<\/i>. CRC Press, New York.","DOI":"10.1201\/9781420009965"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>GREENE, W. H.<\/small> and <small>SEAKS, T. G.<\/small> (1991). The restricted least squares estimator: A pedagogical note. <i>Rev. Econ. Stat.<\/i> <b>73<\/b> 563\u2013567.","DOI":"10.2307\/2109587"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>HEDAYAT, A.<\/small>, <small>STUFKEN, J.<\/small> and <small>YANG, M.<\/small> (2006). Optimal and efficient crossover designs when subject effects are random. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>101<\/b> 1031\u20131038.","DOI":"10.1198\/016214505000001384"},{"key":"20","unstructured":"<small>HINKELMANN, K.<\/small> and <small>KEMPTHORNE, O.<\/small> (2007). <i>Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume<\/i> 2: <i>Advanced Experimental Design<\/i>. John Wiley &amp; Sons, NJ."},{"key":"23","unstructured":"<small>JANKAR, J.<\/small> and <small>MANDAL, A.<\/small> (2021). Optimal crossover designs for generalized linear models: An application to work environment experiment. <i>Statist. Appl.<\/i> <b>19<\/b> 319\u2013336."},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>JIANG, Z.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2026). Supplement to \u201cPrincipled analysis of crossover designs: causal effects, efficient estimation and robust inference.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2663SUPP\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-AOS2663SUPP<\/a>","DOI":"10.1214\/26-AOS2663SUPP"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>JONES, B.<\/small> and <small>KENWARD, M. G.<\/small> (1987). Modelling binary data from a three-period cross-over trial. <i>Stat. Med.<\/i> <b>6<\/b> 555\u2013564.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780060504"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>JONES, B.<\/small> and <small>KENWARD, M. G.<\/small> (2003). <i>Design and Analysis of Cross-over Trials<\/i>. Chapman and Hall, New York.","DOI":"10.1201\/9781420036091"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>KEMPTHORNE, O.<\/small> (1952). <i>The Design and Analysis of Experiments<\/i>. Williams &amp; Wilkins, Philadelphia.","DOI":"10.1097\/00010694-195205000-00012"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>KERSHNER, R. P.<\/small> and <small>FEDERER, W. T.<\/small> (1981). Two-treatment crossover designs for estimating a variety of effects. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>76<\/b> 612\u2013619.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1981.10477693"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>KUNERT, J.<\/small> and <small>STUFKEN, J.<\/small> (2008). Optimal crossover designs for two treatments in the presence of mixed and self-carryover effects. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>103<\/b> 1641\u20131647.","DOI":"10.1198\/016214508000000760"},{"key":"35","unstructured":"<small>LIN, Z.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2025). Unifying regression-based and design-based causal inference in time-series experiments. arXiv preprint. Available at arXiv:<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2510.22864\">2510.22864<\/a>."},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>MADSEN, J. E. H.<\/small>, <small>SCHEIKE, T.<\/small> and <small>PIPPER, C.<\/small> (2023). Unbiased and efficient estimation of causal treatment effects in crossover trials. <i>Biom. J.<\/i> <b>65<\/b> 2200170.","DOI":"10.1002\/bimj.202200170"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>MILLIKEN, G. A.<\/small> and <small>JOHNSON, D. E.<\/small> (2009). <i>Analysis of Messy Data, Volume I<\/i>: <i>Designed Experiments<\/i>. CRC Press, New York.","DOI":"10.1201\/EBK1584883340"},{"key":"39","unstructured":"<small>MILLS, E. J.<\/small>, <small>CHAN, A.-W.<\/small>, <small>WU, P.<\/small>, <small>VAIL, A.<\/small>, <small>GUYATT, G. H.<\/small> and <small>ALTMAN, D. G.<\/small> (2009). Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials. <i>Trials<\/i> <b>10<\/b> 1\u20136."},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>MIRATRIX, L. W.<\/small>, <small>SEKHON, J. S.<\/small> and <small>YU, B.<\/small> (2013). Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratification in randomized experiments. <i>J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.<\/i> <b>75<\/b> 369\u2013396.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9868.2012.01048.x"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>MURRAY, G. D.<\/small> (1994). Editorial: Special issue on crossover trials. <i>Stat. Methods Med. Res.<\/i> <b>3<\/b> 301\u2013302.","DOI":"10.1177\/096228029400300401"},{"key":"42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>NEYMAN, J.<\/small> (1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. <i>Statist. Sci.<\/i> <b>5<\/b> 465\u2013472. Translated from the 1923 Polish original and and edited by D. M. Dabrowska and T. P. Speed.","DOI":"10.1214\/ss\/1177012031"},{"key":"43","unstructured":"<small>NI, T.<\/small> (2025). Decision analytics of switchback experiments: A robust optimization approach. Available at SSRN 5245482."},{"key":"44","unstructured":"<small>NI, T.<\/small> and <small>BOJINOV, I.<\/small> (2025). Enhancing efficiency and robustness for switchback experiments: A practical model-assisted framework. Available at SSRN 5229804."},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>PASHLEY, N. E.<\/small> and <small>MIRATRIX, L. W.<\/small> (2022). Block what you can, except when you shouldn\u2019t. <i>J. Educ. Behav. Stat.<\/i> <b>47<\/b> 69\u2013100.","DOI":"10.3102\/10769986211027240"},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>PATTERSON, S. D.<\/small> and <small>JONES, B.<\/small> (2017). <i>Bioequivalence and Statistics in Clinical Pharmacology<\/i>. CRC Press, New York.","DOI":"10.1201\/9781315374161"},{"key":"48","unstructured":"<small>RAO, C. R.<\/small> (1973). <i>Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications<\/i>. Wiley, New York."},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>SENN, S. S.<\/small> (2002). <i>Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research<\/i>, 5th ed. Wiley, NJ.","DOI":"10.1002\/0470854596"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>SHI, D.<\/small> and <small>YE, T.<\/small> (2024). Behavioral carry-over effect and power consideration in crossover trials. <i>Biometrics<\/i> <b>80<\/b> ujae023.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomtc\/ujae023"},{"key":"51","unstructured":"<small>SUN, J.<\/small>, <small>GUO, P.<\/small>, <small>CHEN, X.<\/small> and <small>TAN, X.<\/small> (2025). Dynamic treatment effect analysis in crossover designs through repeated measures. <i>Stat. Med.<\/i> <b>44<\/b> e70070."},{"key":"52","unstructured":"<small>THEIL, H.<\/small> (1971). <i>Principles of Econometrics<\/i>. Wiley, NJ."},{"key":"53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>WANG, X.<\/small> and <small>CHINCHILLI, V. M.<\/small> (2021). Analysis of crossover designs with nonignorable dropout. <i>Stat. Med.<\/i> <b>40<\/b> 64\u201384.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.8762"},{"key":"54","unstructured":"<small>WU, C. J.<\/small> and <small>HAMADA, M. S.<\/small> (2011). <i>Experiments<\/i>: <i>Planning, Analysis, and Optimization<\/i>. Wiley, NJ."},{"key":"55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>XU, R.<\/small>, <small>MEHROTRA, D. V.<\/small> and <small>SHAW, P. A.<\/small> (2018). Incorporating baseline measurements into the analysis of crossover trials with time-to-event endpoints. <i>Stat. Med.<\/i> <b>37<\/b> 3280\u20133292.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.7834"},{"key":"57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"<small>ZHAO, A.<\/small> and <small>DING, P.<\/small> (2022). Reconciling design-based and model-based causal inferences for split-plot experiments. <i>Ann. Statist.<\/i> <b>50<\/b> 1170\u20131192.","DOI":"10.1214\/21-AOS2144"}],"container-title":["The Annals of Statistics"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:05:56Z","timestamp":1791320756000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/annals-of-statistics\/volume-54\/issue-5\/Principled-analysis-of-crossover-designs--Causal-effects-efficient-estimation\/10.1214\/26-AOS2663.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/26-aos2663","relation":{},"ISSN":["0090-5364","2168-8966"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0090-5364","type":"print"},{"value":"2168-8966","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]]}}}