{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,20]],"date-time":"2025-06-20T00:40:57Z","timestamp":1750380057219},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Institute of Mathematical Statistics","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Statist. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,1]]},"DOI":"10.1214\/10-sts342","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,14]],"date-time":"2011-03-14T13:11:13Z","timestamp":1300108273000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel\u2013Fisher Controversy"],"prefix":"10.1214","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Ana M.","family":"Pires","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jo\u00e3o A.","family":"Branco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"108","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bateson, W. (1902). <i>Mendel\u2019s Principles of Heredity, a Defense<\/i>, 1st ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.","DOI":"10.5962\/bhl.title.95694"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bateson, W. (1909). <i>Mendel\u2019s Principles of Heredity, a Defense<\/i>, 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.","DOI":"10.5962\/bhl.title.1057"},{"key":"3","unstructured":"Bowler, P. J. (1989). <i>The Mendelian Revolution<\/i>. Athlone, London."},{"key":"4","unstructured":"Dawkins, R. (1995). <i>River out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life<\/i>. Perseus Books Group, New York."},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Franklin, A., Edwards, A. W. F., Fairbanks, D. J., Hartl, D. L. and Seidenfeld T. (2008). <i>Ending the Mendel\u2013Fisher Controversy<\/i>. Univ. Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv10tq47g"},{"key":"15","unstructured":"Hald, A. (1998). <i>A History of Mathematical Statistics<\/i>. Wiley, New York."},{"key":"19","unstructured":"Meijer, O. (1983). The essence of Mendel\u2019s discovery. In <i>Gregor Mendel and the Foundation of Genetics<\/i> (V. Orel and A. Matalov\u00e1, eds.) 123\u2013172. Mendelianum of the Moravian Museum, Brno, Czechoslovakia."},{"key":"20","unstructured":"Mendel, G. (1866). Versuche \u00fcber plflanzenhybriden verhandlungen des naturforschenden vereines in Br\u00fcnn. In <i>Bd. IV f\u00fcr das Jahr, 1865<\/i> 78\u2013116. [The first english translation, entitled \u201cExperiments in plant hybridization,\u201d published in Bateson (1909) is also reproduced in Franklin et al. (Fra2008).]"},{"key":"23","unstructured":"Olby, R. (1984). <i>Origin of Mendelism<\/i>, 2nd ed. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago."},{"key":"28","unstructured":"R Development Core Team (2008). <i>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing<\/i>. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria."},{"key":"31","unstructured":"Rosenthal, R. (1976). <i>Experimenter Effects in Behavioural Research<\/i>. Irvington, New York."},{"key":"32","unstructured":"Seidenfeld, T. (1998). P\u2019s in a pod: Some recipes for cooking Mendel\u2019s data. PhilSci Archive, Department of History and Philosophy of Science and Department of Philosophy, Univ. Pittsburgh. [Also reproduced in Franklin et al. (Fra2008).]"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thagard, P. (1988). <i>Computational Philosophy of Science<\/i>. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1968.001.0001"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Beer, G. (1964). Mendel, Darwin and Fisher (1865\u20131965). <i>Notes and Records Roy. Soc. London<\/i> <b>19<\/b> 192\u2013226.","DOI":"10.1098\/rsnr.1964.0016"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Di Trocchio, F. (1991). Mendel\u2019s experiments: A reinterpretation. <i>J. Hist. Biol.<\/i> <b>24<\/b> 485\u2013519.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00156322"},{"key":"7","unstructured":"Dobzhansky, T. (1967). Looking back at Mendel\u2019s discovery. <i>Science<\/i> <b>156<\/b> 1588\u20131589."},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Easterling, R. G. (1976). Goodness of fit and parameter estimation. <i>Technometrics<\/i> <b>18<\/b> 1\u20139.","DOI":"10.2307\/1267910"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards, A. W. F. (1986a). Are Mendel\u2019s results really too close? <i>Biol. Rev.<\/i> <b>61<\/b> 295\u2013312. Also reproduced in Franklin et al. (2008).","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-185X.1986.tb00656.x"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards, A. W. F. (1986b). More on the too-good-to-be true paradox and Gregor Mendel. <i>J. Hered.<\/i> <b>77<\/b> 138.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110192"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fairbanks, D. J. and Rytting, B. (2001). Mendelian controversies: A botanical and historical review. <i>Am. J. Bot.<\/i> <b>88<\/b> 737\u2013752. [Also reproduced in Franklin et al. (2008).]","DOI":"10.2307\/2657027"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fairbanks, D. J. and Schaalje, B. (2007). The tetrad-pollen model fails to explain the bias in Mendel\u2019s pea (Pisum sativum) experiments. <i>Genetics<\/i> <b>177<\/b> 2531\u20132534.","DOI":"10.1534\/genetics.107.079970"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fisher, R. A. (1936). Has Mendel\u2019s work been rediscovered? <i>Ann. of Sci.<\/i> <b>1<\/b> 115\u2013137. [Also reproduced in Franklin et al. (2008).]","DOI":"10.1080\/00033793600200111"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartl, D. L. and Fairbanks, D. J. (2007). Mud sticks: On the alleged falsification of Mendel\u2019s data. <i>Genetics<\/i> <b>175<\/b> 975\u2013979.","DOI":"10.1093\/genetics\/175.3.975"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Leonard, T. (1977). A Bayesian approach to some multinomial estimation and pretesting problems. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>72<\/b> 869\u2013874.","DOI":"10.2307\/2286478"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Massey, F. J. (1951). The Kolmogorov\u2013Smirnov test for goodness of fit. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>46<\/b> 68\u201378.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1951.10500769"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nissani, M. and Hoefler-Nissani, D. M. (1992). Experimental studies of belief-dependence of observations and of resistance to conceptual change. <i>Cognition Instruct.<\/i> <b>9<\/b> 97\u2013111.","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci0902_1"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Novitski, C. E. (1995). Another look at some of Mendel\u2019s results. <i>J. Hered.<\/i> <b>86<\/b> 62\u201366.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111529"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arised from random sampling. <i>Philos. Mag.<\/i> <b>50<\/b> 157\u2013175.","DOI":"10.1080\/14786440009463897"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Piegorsch, W. W. (1983). The questions of fit in the Gregor Mendel controversy. <i>Comm. Statist. Theory Methods<\/i> <b>12<\/b> 2289\u20132304.","DOI":"10.1080\/03610928308828606"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pilgrim, I. (1984). The too-good-to-be-true paradox and Gregor Mendel. <i>J. Hered.<\/i> <b>75<\/b> 501\u2013502.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109998"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pilgrim, I. (1986). A solution to the too-good-to-be-true paradox and Gregor Mendel. <i>J. Hered.<\/i> <b>77<\/b> 218\u2013220.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110224"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Robertson, T. (1978). Testing for and against an order restriction on multinomial parameters. <i>J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.<\/i> <b>73<\/b> 197\u2013202.","DOI":"10.2307\/2286546"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1983). Mendel and methodology. <i>Hist. Sci.<\/i> <b>21<\/b> 275\u2013295.","DOI":"10.1177\/007327538302100303"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stigler, S. M. (2008). CSI: Mendel. Book review. <i>Am. Sci.<\/i> <b>96<\/b> 425\u2013426.","DOI":"10.1511\/2008.74.425"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weiling, F. (1986). What about R.A. Fisher\u2019s statement of the \u201cToo Good\u201d data of J. G. Mendel\u2019s Pisum paper? <i>J. Hered.<\/i> <b>77<\/b> 281\u2013283.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110239"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weldon, W. R. F. (1902). Mendel\u2019s law of alternative inheritance in peas. <i>Biometrika<\/i> <b>1<\/b> 228\u2013254.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/1.2.228"}],"container-title":["Statistical Science"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/download\/pdfview_1\/euclid.ss\/1300108237","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,20]],"date-time":"2021-11-20T08:43:19Z","timestamp":1637397799000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/statistical-science\/volume-25\/issue-4\/A-Statistical-Model-to-Explain-the-MendelFisher-Controversy\/10.1214\/10-STS342.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,1]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/10-sts342","relation":{},"ISSN":["0883-4237"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0883-4237","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,1]]}}}