{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T10:44:48Z","timestamp":1774953888804,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]]},"DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-1435438","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,28]],"date-time":"2011-07-28T17:56:37Z","timestamp":1311875797000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Being Wrong: Logics for False Belief"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"52","author":[{"given":"Christopher","family":"Steinsvold","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[1] Boolos, G., <i>The Logic of Provability<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511625183"},{"key":"2","unstructured":"[2] Brogan, A. P., \"Aristotle's logic of statements about contingency\", <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 76 (1967), pp. 46\u201381."},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[3] Cresswell, M. J., \"Necessity and contingency\", <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 47 (1988), pp. 145\u201349.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370288"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[4] Humberstone, I. L., \"The logic of non-contingency\", <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 36 (1995), pp. 214\u201329.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040248455"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[5] Kuhn, S. T., \"Minimal non-contingency logic\", <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 36 (1995), pp. 230\u201334.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040248456"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[6] Kushida, H., \"The modal logic of G\u00f6del sentences\", <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 39 (2010), pp. 577\u201390.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-010-9140-8"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] Lomuscio, A., and W. van der Hoek, \"A logic for ignorance\", <i>Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science<\/i>, vol. 85 (2004).","DOI":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(05)82603-9"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"[8] Marcos, J., \"Logics of essence and accident\", <i>Bulletin of the Section of Logic<\/i>, vol. 34 (2005), pp. 43\u201356."},{"key":"9","unstructured":"[9] Montgomery, H., and R. Routley, \"Non-contingency axioms for ${\\rm S}4$\" and ${\\rm S}5$, <i>Logique et Analyse. Nouvelle S\u00e9rie<\/i>, vol. 11 (1968), pp. 422\u201324."},{"key":"10","unstructured":"[10] Mortensen, C., \"A sequence of normal modal systems with non-contingency bases\", <i>Logique et Analyse. Nouvelle S\u00e9rie<\/i>, vol. 19 (1976), pp. 341\u201344."},{"key":"11","unstructured":"[11] Steinsvold, C., \"Completeness for various logics of essence and accident\", <i>Bulletin of the Section of Logic<\/i>, vol. 37 (2008), pp. 93\u2013101."},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[12] Steinsvold, C., \"A note on logics of ignorance and borders\", <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 49 (2008), pp. 385\u201392.","DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-2008-018"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[13] Steinsvold, C., \"The boxdot conjecture and the language of essence and accident\", <i>The Australasian Journal of Logic<\/i>, vol. 10 (2011), pp. 18\u201335.","DOI":"10.26686\/ajl.v10i0.1822"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[14] Zolin, E. E., \"Completeness and definability in the logic of noncontingency\", <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 40 (1999), pp. 533\u201347.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1012429717"}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1215\/00294527-1435438","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T20:57:41Z","timestamp":1706648261000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-52\/issue-3\/Being-Wrong-Logics-for-False-Belief\/10.1215\/00294527-1435438.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00294527-1435438","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,7,1]]}}}