{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T18:27:24Z","timestamp":1767896844936,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-1731407","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,14]],"date-time":"2012-12-14T14:15:27Z","timestamp":1355494527000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["A New Conditional for Naive Truth Theory"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"Andrew","family":"Bacon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"3","unstructured":"[3] Blackburn, P., M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema, <i>Modal Logic<\/i>, vol. 53 of <i>Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001."},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[1] Bacon, A., \u201cCurry\u2019s paradox and omega-inconsistency,\u201d to appear in <i>Studia Logica<\/i>.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-012-9373-3"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[2] Beall, J., <i>Spandrels of Truth<\/i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199268733.001.0001"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[4] Brady, R. T., \u201cThe simple consistency of a set theory based on the logic CSQ,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 24 (1983), pp. 431\u201349.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093870447"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[5] Brady, R. T., \u201cThe non-triviality of dialectical set theory,\u201d pp. 437\u201370 of <i>Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent<\/i>, Philosofia, Munich, 1989.","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv2x8v8c7.19"},{"key":"6","unstructured":"[6] Brady, R. T., <i>Universal Logic<\/i>, vol. 109 of <i>CSLI Lecture Notes<\/i>, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 2006."},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] Field, H., <i>Saving Truth from Paradox<\/i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199230747.001.0001"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[8] Fitting, M., \u201cBilattices and the theory of truth,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 18 (1989), 225\u201356.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00274066"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[9] Gupta, A., and N. D. Belnap, <i>The Revision Theory of Truth<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5938.001.0001"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[10] Herzberger, H. G., \u201cNotes on naive semantics,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 11 (1982), pp. 61\u2013102.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00302339"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[11] Kripke, S., \u201cOutline of a theory of truth,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophy<\/i>, vol. 72 (1975), pp. 690\u2013716.","DOI":"10.2307\/2024634"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[12] Priest, G., \u201c Paraconsistent logic,\u201d pp. 287\u2013393 in <i>Handbook of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 6, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0460-1_4"},{"key":"13","unstructured":"[13] Restall, G., <i>An Introduction to Substructural Logics<\/i>, Routledge, London, 2000."},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[14] Routley, R., and R. K. Meyer, \u201cDialectical logic, classical logic, and the consistency of the world,\u201d <i>Studies in East European Thought<\/i>, vol. 16 (1976), pp. 1\u201325.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00832085"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[15] Yablo, S., \u201cNew grounds for naive truth theory,\u201d pp. 312\u201330 in <i>Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox<\/i>, edited by J. C. Beall, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199264803.003.0015"}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1215\/00294527-1731407","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]],"date-time":"2024-05-03T10:03:27Z","timestamp":1714730607000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-54\/issue-1\/A-New-Conditional-for-Naive-Truth-Theory\/10.1215\/00294527-1731407.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,1,1]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00294527-1731407","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,1,1]]}}}