{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,17]],"date-time":"2026-03-17T01:59:26Z","timestamp":1773712766551,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-1960497","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,20]],"date-time":"2014-01-20T19:34:00Z","timestamp":1390246440000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Set Theory, Topology, and the Possibility of Junky Worlds"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"55","author":[{"given":"Thomas","family":"Mormann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"1","unstructured":"[1] Armstrong, D. M., <i>A Combinatorial Theory of Possible Worlds<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991."},{"key":"2","unstructured":"[2] Benacerraf, P., \u201cWhat numbers could not be,\u201d pp. 403\u201320 in <i>Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings<\/i>, edited by P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983."},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[3] Bohn, E. S., \u201cAn argument against the necessity of unrestricted composition,\u201d <i>Analysis<\/i>, vol. 69 (2009), pp. 27\u201331.","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/ann004"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[4] Bohn, E. S., \u201cMust there be a top level?\u201d <i>The Philosophical Quarterly<\/i>, vol. 59 (2009), pp. 193\u2013201.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9213.2008.573.x"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[5] Boolos, G., \u201cMust we believe in set theory?\u201d pp. 257\u201368 in <i>Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons<\/i>, edited by G. Sher and R. Tieszen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511570681.013"},{"key":"6","unstructured":"[6] Cassirer, E., <i>Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff<\/i>, Bruno Cassirer, Berlin, 1910. Translated by W. Swabey and M. Swabey as <i>Substance and Function<\/i>, Open Court, Chicago, 1923."},{"key":"7","unstructured":"[7] Hellman, G., <i>Mathematics without Numbers: Towards a Modal-Structural Interpretation<\/i>, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989."},{"key":"8","unstructured":"[8] Hellman, G., <i>Maximality vs. Extendability: Reflections on Structuralism and Set Theory<\/i>, pp. 335\u201361 in <i>Reading Natural Philosophy<\/i>, edited by D. Malament, Open Court, Chicago, 2002."},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[9] Hellman, G., \u201cOn the significance of the Burali-Forti paradox,\u201d <i>Analysis (Oxford)<\/i>, vol. 71 (2011), pp. 631\u201337.","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/anr091"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"[10] Kuratowski, K., and A. Mostowski, <i>Set Theory: With an Introduction to Descriptive Set Theory<\/i>, vol. 86 of <i>Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics<\/i>, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976."},{"key":"11","unstructured":"[11] Lewis, D., <i>Parts of Classes<\/i>, Blackwell, Oxford, 1991."},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[12] Natorp, P., \u201cKant und die Marburger Schule,\u201d <i>Kant-Studien<\/i>, vol. 17 (1912), pp. 193\u2013221.","DOI":"10.1515\/kant.1912.17.1-3.193"},{"key":"13","unstructured":"[13] Priest, G., <i>Beyond the Limits of Thought<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995."},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[14] Putnam, H., \u201cParadox Revisited, II: Sets\u2014A Case of All or None?\u201d pp. 16\u201326 in <i>Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons<\/i>, edited by G. Sher and R. Tieszen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511570681.003"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[15] Resnik, M. D., \u201cMathematics as a science of patterns: Ontology and reference,\u201d <i>No\u00fbs<\/i>, vol. 15 (1981), pp. 529\u201350.","DOI":"10.2307\/2214851"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[16] Resnik, M. D., \u201cMathematics as a science of patterns: Epistemology,\u201d <i>No\u00fbs<\/i>, vol. 16 (1982), pp. 95\u2013107.","DOI":"10.2307\/2215419"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[17] Shapiro, S., \u201cMathematics and reality,\u201d <i>Philosophy of Science<\/i>, vol. 50 (1983), pp. 523\u201348.","DOI":"10.1086\/289138"},{"key":"18","unstructured":"[18] Shapiro, S., <i>Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology<\/i>, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997."},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[19] Uzquiano, G., \u201cThe price of universality,\u201d <i>Philosophical Studies<\/i>, vol. 129 (2006), pp. 137\u201369.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-005-3018-6"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[20] Watson, D., \u201cAn argument against an argument against the necessity of unrestricted fusion,\u201d <i>Analysis<\/i>, vol. 70 (2010), pp. 78\u201382.","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/anp141"},{"key":"21","unstructured":"[21] Willard, S., <i>General Topology<\/i>, Dover, Mineola, N.Y., 2004."},{"key":"#cr-split#-22.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[22] Zermelo, E., \"Untersuchungen \u00fcber die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre, I,\" <i>Mathematische Annalen<\/i>, vol. 65 (1908), pp. 261-81","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01449999"},{"key":"#cr-split#-22.2","unstructured":"English translation, pp. 199-215 in <i>From Frege to G\u00f6del: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931<\/i>, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2002."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[23] Zermelo, E., \u201c\u00dcber Grenzzahlen und Mengenbereiche,\u201d <i>Fundamenta Mathematicae<\/i>, vol. 16 (1930), pp. 29\u201347; English translation, pp. 1208\u201333 in <i>From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics<\/i>, vol. 2, edited by W. Ewald, Oxford University Press, New York.","DOI":"10.4064\/fm-16-1-29-47"}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1215\/00294527-1960497","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T20:58:13Z","timestamp":1706648293000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-55\/issue-1\/Set-Theory-Topology-and-the-Possibility-of-Junky-Worlds\/10.1215\/00294527-1960497.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00294527-1960497","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]}}}