{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,30]],"date-time":"2024-06-30T19:10:12Z","timestamp":1719774612899},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-2017-0025","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,25]],"date-time":"2018-01-25T03:00:55Z","timestamp":1516849255000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Blurring: An Approach to Conflation"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"59","author":[{"given":"David","family":"Ripley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[1] Belnap, N. D., \u201cTonk, plonk, and plink,\u201d <i>Analysis<\/i>, vol. 22 (1962), pp. 130\u201334.","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/22.6.130"},{"key":"2","unstructured":"[2] Brandom, R., <i>Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment<\/i>, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1994."},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[3] Brandom, R., <i>Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism<\/i>, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2000.","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674028739"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[4] Camp, J. L., Jr., <i>Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge<\/i>, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2002.","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674029170"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[5] Camp, J. L., Jr., \u201cPr\u00e9cis of Confusion,\u201d <i>Philosophy and Phenomenological Research<\/i>, vol. 74 (2007), pp. 692\u201399.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2007.00046.x"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[6] Cobreros, P., P. Egr\u00e9, D. Ripley, and R. van Rooij, \u201cTolerant, classical, strict,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 41 (2012), pp. 347\u201385.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-010-9165-z"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] Cobreros, P., P. Egr\u00e9, D. Ripley, and R. van Rooij, \u201cReaching transparent truth,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 122 (2013), pp. 841\u201366.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzt110"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[8] Cook, R. T., \u201cWhat\u2019s wrong with tonk(?),\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 34 (2005), pp. 217\u201326.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-004-7805-x"},{"key":"9","unstructured":"[9] Dummett, M., <i>The Logical Basis of Metaphysics<\/i>, Duckworth, London, 1991."},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[10] Dunn, J. M., and G. M. Hardegree, <i>Algebraic Methods in Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 41 of <i>Oxford Logic Guides<\/i>, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198531920.001.0001"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[11] Field, H., \u201cTheory change and the indeterminacy of reference,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophy<\/i>, vol. 70 (1973), pp. 462\u201381.","DOI":"10.2307\/2025110"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[12] Frost-Arnold, G., \u201cToo much reference: Semantics for multiply signifying terms,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 37 (2008), pp. 239\u201357.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-007-9067-x"},{"key":"13","unstructured":"[13] Galatos, N., P. Jipsen, T. Kowalski, and H. Ono, <i>Residuated Lattices: An Algebraic Glimpse at Substructural Logics<\/i>, vol. 151 of <i>Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics<\/i>, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007."},{"key":"14","unstructured":"[14] Gupta, A., \u201cMeaning and misconceptions,\u201d pp. 15\u201341 in <i>Language, Logic, and Concepts<\/i>, edited by R. S. Jackendoff, P. Bloom, and K. Wynn, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1999."},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] Halln\u00e4s, L., \u201cPartial inductive definitions,\u201d <i>Theoretical Computer Science<\/i>, vol. 87 (1991), pp. 115\u201342.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3975(06)80007-1"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[16] Humberstone, L., \u201cHeterogeneous logic,\u201d <i>Erkenntnis<\/i>, vol. 29 (1988), pp. 395\u2013435.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00183072"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[17] Humberstone, L., <i>The Connectives<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2011.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9055.001.0001"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[18] Lawlor, K., \u201cA notional worlds approach to confusion,\u201d <i>Mind and Language<\/i>, vol. 22 (2007), pp. 150\u201372.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2007.00304.x"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[19] Lewy, C., J. Watling, and P. T. Geach, \u201cSymposium: Entailment,\u201d <i>Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes<\/i>, vol. 32 (1958), pp. 123\u201372.","DOI":"10.1093\/aristoteliansupp\/32.1.123"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[20] Millikan, R. G., <i>On Clear and Confused Ideas<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511613296"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[21] Prior, A., \u201cThe runabout inference-ticket,\u201d <i>Analysis<\/i>, vol. 21 (1960), pp. 38\u201339.","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/21.2.38"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[22] Ripley, D., \u201cParadoxes and failures of cut,\u201d <i>Australasian Journal of Philosophy<\/i>, vol. 91 (2013), pp. 139\u201364.","DOI":"10.1080\/00048402.2011.630010"},{"key":"23","unstructured":"[23] Ripley, D., \u201cRevising up: Strengthening classical logic in the face of paradox,\u201d <i>Philosophers\u2019 Imprint<\/i>, vol. 13 (2013), pp. 1\u201313."},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[24] Ripley, D., \u201cAnything goes,\u201d <i>Topoi<\/i>, vol. 34 (2015), pp. 25\u201336.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-014-9261-8"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[25] Ripley, D., \u201c\u2018Transitivity\u2019 of consequence relations,\u201d pp. 328\u201340 in <i>Logic, Rationality, and Interaction<\/i>, edited by W. van der Hoek, W. H. Holliday, and W.-F. Wang, vol. 9394 of <i>Lecture Notes in Computer Science<\/i>, Springer, Heidelberg, 2015.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-48561-3_27"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[26] Scharp, K., <i>Replacing Truth<\/i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199653850.001.0001"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] Schroeder-Heister, P., \u201cThe categorical and the hypothetical: A critique of some fundamental assumptions of standard semantics,\u201d <i>Synthese<\/i>, vol. 187 (2012), pp. 925\u201342.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-011-9910-z"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[28] Sellars, W., \u201cInference and meaning,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 62 (1953), pp. 313\u201338.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/LXII.247.313"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[29] Shoesmith, D. J., and T. J. Smiley, <i>Multiple-Conclusion Logic<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511565687"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[30] Smiley, T. J., \u201cEntailment and deducibility,\u201d <i>Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society<\/i>, vol. 59 (1958\/1959), pp. 233\u201354.","DOI":"10.1093\/aristotelian\/59.1.233"},{"key":"31","unstructured":"[31] Tennant, N., <i>Anti-Realism and Logic: Truth as Eternal<\/i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987."},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[32] Weir, A., \u201cA robust non-transitive logic,\u201d <i>Topoi<\/i>, vol. 34 (2015), pp. 99\u2013107.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-013-9176-9"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[33] Zardini, E., \u201cA model of tolerance,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 90 (2008), pp. 337\u201368.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-008-9156-z"}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1215\/00294527-2017-0025","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,30]],"date-time":"2024-06-30T18:43:35Z","timestamp":1719773015000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-59\/issue-2\/Blurring-An-Approach-to-Conflation\/10.1215\/00294527-2017-0025.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00294527-2017-0025","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]]}}}