{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,15]],"date-time":"2024-07-15T00:09:01Z","timestamp":1721002141184},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-2018-0023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,25]],"date-time":"2019-01-25T03:06:58Z","timestamp":1548385618000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Abstraction Principles and the Classification of Second-Order Equivalence Relations"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"60","author":[{"given":"Sean C.","family":"Ebels-Duggan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"14","unstructured":"[14] MacFarlane, J., \u201cLogical constants,\u201d in <i>The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy<\/i>, 2015, <a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/logical-constants\">https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/logical-constants<\/a>."},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[2] Bonnay, D., \u201cLogicality and invariance,\u201d <i>Bulletin of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 14 (2008), pp. 29\u201368.","DOI":"10.2178\/bsl\/1208358843"},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[1] Antonelli, G. A., \u201cNotions of invariance for abstraction principles,\u201d <i>Philosophia Mathematica (3)<\/i>, vol. 18 (2010), pp. 276\u201392.","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/nkq010"},{"key":"3","unstructured":"[3] Boolos, G.,\u201cThe standard equality of numbers,\u201d pp. 261\u201377 in <i>Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990."},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[4] Button, T., <i>The Limits of Realism<\/i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199672172.001.0001"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[5] Cook, R. T., \u201cAbstraction and four kinds of invariance (or: what\u2019s so logical about counting,\u201d <i>Philosophia Mathematica (3)<\/i>, vol. 25 (2017), pp. 3\u201325.","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/nkw014"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[6] Ebels-Duggan, S. C., \u201cThe nuisance principle in infinite settings,\u201d <i>Thought: A Journal of Philosophy<\/i>, vol. 4 (2015), pp. 263\u201368.","DOI":"10.1002\/tht3.186"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[7] Fine, K., <i>The Limits of Abstraction<\/i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199246182.001.0001"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"[8] Frege, G., <i>The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number<\/i>, 2nd edition, Harper, New York, 1960."},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[9] Hale, B., \u201cReals by abstraction,\u201d <i>Philosophia Mathematica (3)<\/i>, vol. 8 (2000), pp. 100\u2013123.","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/8.2.100"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"[10] Hale, B., and C. Wright, <i>The Reason\u2019s Proper Study: Essays Towards a Neo-Fregean Philosophy of Mathematics<\/i>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001."},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[11] Heck, R. G., Jr., \u201cFinitude and Hume\u2019s principle,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 26 (1997), pp. 589\u2013617.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1004299720847"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[12] Heck, R. G., Jr., \u201cThe Julius Caesar Objection,\u201d pp. 273\u2013308, in <i>Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett<\/i>, edited by R. G. Heck Jr., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198239208.003.0011"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[13] MacBride, F., \u201cOn finite Hume,\u201d <i>Philosophia Mathematica<\/i>, vol. 8 (2000), pp. 150\u201359.","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/8.2.150"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] McGee, V., \u201cLogical operations,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 25 (1996), pp. 567\u201380.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00265253"},{"key":"16","unstructured":"[16] Parsons, C., \u201cFrege\u2019s theory of number,\u201d pp. 180\u2013203 in <i>Philosophy in America<\/i>, edited by Max Black, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1965."},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[17] Quine, W. V., <i>Philosophy of Logic<\/i>, 2nd edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042445"},{"key":"18","unstructured":"[18] Shapiro, S., <i>Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic<\/i>, vol. 17 of <i>Oxford Logic Guides<\/i>, Oxford University Press, New York, 1991."},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[19] Shapiro, S., and A. Weir, \u201cNew V, ZF and abstraction,\u201d <i>Philosophia Mathematica (3)<\/i>, vol. 7 (1999), pp. 293\u2013321.","DOI":"10.1093\/philmat\/7.3.293"},{"key":"20","unstructured":"[20] Sher, G., <i>The Bounds of Logic: A Generalized Viewpoint<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991."},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[21] Tarski, A., \u201cWhat are Logical Notions?\u201d <i>History and Philosophy of Logic<\/i>, vol. 7 (1986), pp. 143\u201354.","DOI":"10.1080\/01445348608837096"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[22] Walsh, S., \u201cComparing Peano arithmetic, basic law V, and Hume\u2019s principle,\u201d <i>Annals of Pure and Applied Logic<\/i>, vol. 163 (2012), pp. 1679\u2013709.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apal.2011.12.016"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[23] Walsh, S., and S. Ebels-Duggan, \u201cRelative categoricity and abstraction principles,\u201d <i>Review of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 8 (2015), pp. 572\u2013606.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020315000052"},{"key":"24","unstructured":"[24] Woods, J., \u201cLogical indefinites,\u201d <i>Logique et Analyse (N.S.)<\/i>, vol. 57 (2014), pp. 277\u2013307."},{"key":"25","unstructured":"[25] Wright, C., <i>Frege\u2019s Conception of Numbers as Objects<\/i>, vol. 2 of <i>Scots Philosophical Monographs<\/i>, Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen, 1983."},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[26] Wright, C., \u201cOn the philosophical significance of Frege\u2019s theorem,\u201d pp. 201\u201344 in <i>Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett<\/i>, edited by R. G. Heck Jr., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198239208.003.0008"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] Wright, C., \u201cIs Hume\u2019s principle analytic?,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 40 (1999), pp. 6\u201330.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1039096303"}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1215\/00294527-2018-0023","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,14]],"date-time":"2024-07-14T09:43:43Z","timestamp":1720950223000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-60\/issue-1\/Abstraction-Principles-and-the-Classification-of-Second-Order-Equivalence-Relations\/10.1215\/00294527-2018-0023.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00294527-2018-0023","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]]}}}