{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,8]],"date-time":"2025-09-08T05:46:36Z","timestamp":1757310396846},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,1]]},"DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-2021-0020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,9]],"date-time":"2021-06-09T15:36:43Z","timestamp":1623253003000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Inclosure and Intolerance"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"62","author":[{"given":"Sergi","family":"Oms","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Logos Group\/BIAP, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08001, Spain"}]},{"given":"Elia","family":"Zardini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Logic and Theoretical Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain; and International Laboratory for Logic, Linguistics and Formal Philosophy, School of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, Nation"}]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"16","unstructured":"Priest, G., <i>In Contradiction<\/i>, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006."},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cNaive truth and naive logical properties,\u201d <i>Review of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 7 (2014), pp. 351\u201384.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020314000045"},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asenjo, F. G., \u201cA calculus of antinomies,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 7 (1966), pp. 103\u20135.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093958482"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beall, J. C., \u201cFinding tolerance without gluts,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 123 (2014), pp. 791\u2013811.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzu081"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beall, J. C., \u201cEnd of inclosure,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 123 (2014), pp. 829\u201349.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzu075"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beall, J. C., R. T. Brady, A. P. Hazen, G. Priest, and G. Restall, \u201cRelevant restricted quantification,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 35 (2006), pp. 587\u201398.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-005-9008-5"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beall, J. C. and M. Colyvan, \u201cHeaps of gluts and Hyde-ing the sorites,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 110 (2001), pp. 401\u20138.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/110.438.401"},{"key":"6","unstructured":"Colyvan, M., \u201cVagueness and truth,\u201d pp. 29\u201340 in <i>From Truth to Reality: New Essays in Logic and Metaphysics<\/i>, edited by H. Dyke, Routledge, London, 2009."},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"L\u00f3pez de Sa, D. and E. Zardini, \u201cTruthmakers, knowledge and paradox,\u201d <i>Analysis<\/i>, vol. 67 (2007), pp. 242\u201350.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8284.2007.00681.x"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"L\u00f3pez de Sa, D. and E. Zardini, \u201cNo-no. Paradox and consistency,\u201d <i>Analysis<\/i>, vol. 71 (2011), pp. 472\u201378.","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/anr044"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oms, S., \u201cThe sorites paradox in philosophy of logic,\u201d pp. 189\u2013206 in <i>The Sorites Paradox<\/i>, edited by S. Oms and E. Zardini, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316683064.011"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"Oms, S., \u201cSome remarks on the notion of paradox,\u201d typescript, 2020."},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oms, S. and E. Zardini, \u201cAn introduction to the sorites paradox,\u201d pp. 3\u201318 in <i>The Sorites Paradox<\/i>, edited by S. Oms and E. Zardini, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316683064.011"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oms, S. and E. Zardini, eds., <i>The Sorites Paradox<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316683064"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Priest, G., \u201cThe structure of the paradoxes of self-reference,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 103 (1994), pp. 25\u201334.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/103.409.25"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Priest, G., \u201cYablo\u2019s paradox,\u201d <i>Analysis<\/i>, vol. 57 (1997), pp. 236\u201342.","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-8284.00081"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Priest, G., <i>Beyond the Limits of Thought<\/i>, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199254057.001.0001"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Priest, G., \u201cInclosures, vagueness, and self-reference,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 51 (2010), pp. 69\u201384.","DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-2010-005"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Priest, G., \u201cVague inclosures,\u201d pp. 367\u201377 in <i>Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications<\/i>, edited by K. Tanaka, F. Berto, E. Mares, and F. Paoli, vol. 26 of <i>Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science<\/i>, Springer, Dordrecht, 2013.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-4438-7_20"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Priest, G., \u201cWhat if? The exploration of an idea,\u201d <i>Australasian Journal of Logic<\/i>, vol. 14 (2017), pp. 54\u2013127.","DOI":"10.26686\/ajl.v14i1.4028"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Priest, G., \u201cDialetheism and the sorites paradox,\u201d pp. 135\u201350 in <i>The Sorites Paradox<\/i>, edited by S. Oms and E. Zardini, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316683064.011"},{"key":"21","unstructured":"Sainsbury, M., <i>Paradoxes<\/i>, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009."},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Slaney, J., \u201cA logic for vagueness,\u201d <i>Australasian Journal of Logic<\/i>, vol. 8 (2011), pp. 100\u201334.","DOI":"10.26686\/ajl.v8i0.1815"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weber, Z., \u201cA paraconsistent model of vagueness,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 119 (2010), pp. 1025\u201345.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzq071"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weber, Z., D. Ripley, G. Priest, D. Hyde, and M. Colyvan, \u201cTolerating gluts,\u201d <i>Mind<\/i>, vol. 123 (2014), pp. 813\u201328.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzu057"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yablo, S., \u201cTruth and reflection,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 14 (1985), pp. 297\u2013348.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00249368"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cA model of tolerance,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 90 (2008), pp. 337\u201368.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-008-9156-z"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cGetting one for two, or the contractors\u2019 bad deal: Towards a unified solution to the semantic paradoxes,\u201d pp. 461\u201393 in <i>Unifying the Philosophy of Truth<\/i>, edited by T. Achourioti, K. Fujimoto, H. Galinon, and J. Mart\u00ednez, vol. 36 of <i>Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science<\/i>, Springer, Dordrecht, 2015.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-9673-6_23"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cRestriction by noncontraction,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 57 (2016), pp. 287\u2013327.","DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-3429057"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cInstability and contraction: <i>M\u00e9ditations h\u00e9g\u00e9liennes<\/i> I,\u201d <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 48 (2018), pp. 155\u201388.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-018-9483-0"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cNon-transitivism and the sorites paradox,\u201d pp. 168\u201396 in in <i>The Sorites Paradox<\/i>, edited by S. Oms and E. Zardini, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316683064.011"},{"key":"32","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cLiving on the slippery slope: The nature, sources and logic of vagueness,\u201d Ph.D. dissertation, University of St Andrews, Scotland, 2008."},{"key":"33","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201cSubstructural approaches to paradox,\u201d to appear in <i>Synthese<\/i> (2021)."},{"key":"34","unstructured":"Zardini, E., \u201c<i>Seconde na\u00efvet\u00e9<\/i>,\u201d to appear in <i>On the Sorites Paradox<\/i> (2021)."}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1215\/00294527-2021-0020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T21:00:31Z","timestamp":1706648431000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-62\/issue-2\/Inclosure-and-Intolerance\/10.1215\/00294527-2021-0020.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,1]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00294527-2021-0020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,1]]}}}