{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,31]],"date-time":"2024-05-31T10:38:06Z","timestamp":1717151886359},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-3671151","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T16:22:02Z","timestamp":1472746922000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Admissible Rules and the Leibniz Hierarchy"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"57","author":[{"given":"James G.","family":"Raftery","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"9","unstructured":"[9] Blok, W. J., and D. Pigozzi, \u201cAbstract algebraic logic and the deduction theorem,\u201d preprint, <a href=\"http:\/\/orion.math.iastate.edu\/dpigozzi\/\">http:\/\/orion.math.iastate.edu\/dpigozzi\/<\/a> (accessed 26 July 2001)."},{"key":"1","unstructured":"[1] Anderson, A. R., and N. D. Belnap, Jr., <i>Entailment, I: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity<\/i>, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975."},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[2] Avron, A., \u201cImplicational $F$-structures and implicational relevance logics,\u201d <i>Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 788\u2013802.","DOI":"10.2307\/2586570"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[3] Belardinelli, F., P. Jipsen, and H. Ono, \u201cAlgebraic aspects of cut elimination,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 77 (2004), pp. 209\u201340.","DOI":"10.1023\/B:STUD.0000037127.15182.2a"},{"key":"4","unstructured":"[4] Bergman, C., \u201cStructural completeness in algebra and logic,\u201d pp. 59\u201373 in <i>Algebraic Logic (Budapest, 1988)<\/i>, edited by H. Andr\u00e9ka, J. D. Monk, and I. Nemeti, vol. 54 of <i>Colloquia Mathematica Societatis J\u00e1nos Bolyai<\/i>, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991."},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[5] Blok, W. J., and B. J\u00f3nsson, \u201cEquivalence of consequence operations,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 83 (2006), pp. 91\u2013110.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-006-8299-z"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[6] Blok, W. J., and D. Pigozzi, \u201cProtoalgebraic logics,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 45 (1986), pp. 337\u201369.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370269"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[7] Blok, W. J., and D. Pigozzi, <i>Algebraizable Logics<\/i>, vol. 77 of <i>Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society<\/i>, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1989.","DOI":"10.1090\/memo\/0396"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"[8] Blok, W. J., and D. Pigozzi, \u201cAlgebraic semantics for universal Horn logic without equality,\u201d pp. 1\u201356 in <i>Universal Algebra and Quasigroup Theory (Jadwisin, 1989)<\/i>, edited by A. Romanowska and J. D. H. Smith, vol. 19 of <i>Research and Exposition in Mathematics<\/i>, Heldermann, Berlin, 1992."},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[10] Burris, S., and H. P. Sankappanavar, <i>A Course in Universal Algebra<\/i>, vol. 78 of <i>Graduate Texts in Mathematics<\/i>, Springer, New York, 1981.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4613-8130-3"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[11] Chagrov, A. V., \u201cA decidable modal logic for which the admissibility of inference rules is an undecidable problem,\u201d <i>Algebra and Logic<\/i>, vol. 31 (1992), pp. 53\u201361.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02259858"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[12] Cintula, P., and G. Metcalfe, \u201cStructural completeness in fuzzy logics,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 50 (2009), pp. 153\u201382.","DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-2009-004"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[13] Cintula, P., and G. Metcalfe, \u201cAdmissible rules in the implication-negation fragment of intuitionistic logic,\u201d <i>Annals of Pure and Applied Logic<\/i>, vol. 162 (2010), pp. 162\u201371.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apal.2010.09.001"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[14] Czelakowski, J., \u201cEquivalential logics, I,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 40 (1981), pp. 227\u201336; <i>II<\/i>, pp. 355\u201372.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02584057"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[15] Czelakowski, J., <i>Protoalgebraic Logics<\/i>, vol. 10 of <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-2807-2"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[16] Czelakowski, J., \u201cThe Suszko operator, Part I,\u201d pp. 181\u2013231 in <i>Abstract Algebraic Logic, Part II (Barcelona, 1997)<\/i>, vol. 74 of <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1024678007488"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[17] Czelakowski, J., and R. Jansana, \u201cWeakly algebraizable logics,\u201d <i>Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 641\u201368.","DOI":"10.2307\/2586559"},{"key":"18","unstructured":"[18] Diego, A., <i>Sur les alg\u00e8bres de Hilbert<\/i>, vol. 21 of <i>Collection de Logique Math\u00e9matique, S\u00e9rie A<\/i>, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1966."},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[19] Dunn, J. M., and G. Restall, \u201cRelevance logic and entailment,\u201d pp. 1\u2013128 in <i>Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 8<\/i>, 2nd edition, edited by D. Gabbay, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0460-1_1"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[20] Dzik, W., and A. Wro\u0144ski, \u201cStructural completeness of G\u00f6del\u2019s and Dummett\u2019s propositional calculi,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 32 (1973), pp. 69\u201373.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02123815"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[21] Font, J. M., R. Jansana, and D. Pigozzi, \u201cA survey of abstract algebraic logic,\u201d pp. 13\u201397 in <i>Abstract Algebraic Logic, Part II (Barcelona, 1997)<\/i>, vol. 74 of <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1024621922509"},{"key":"22","unstructured":"[22] Galatos, N., P. Jipsen, T. Kowalski, and H. Ono, <i>Residuated Lattices: An Algebraic Glimpse at Substructural Logics<\/i>, vol. 151 in <i>Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics<\/i>, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[23] Gorbunov, V. A., \u201cLattices of quasivarieties,\u201d <i>Algebra and Logic<\/i>, vol. 15 (1976), pp. 275\u201388.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01875943"},{"key":"24","unstructured":"[24] Gorbunov, V. A., <i>Algebraic Theory of Quasivarieties<\/i>, Consultants Bureau, New York, 1998."},{"key":"25","unstructured":"[25] Gorbunov, V. A., and V. I. Tumanov, \u201cConstruction of lattices of quasivarieties,\u201d pp. 12\u201344 in <i>Mathematical Logic and the Theory of Algorithms<\/i>, vol. 2 of <i>Trudy Instituta Matematiki Sibirsk. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR<\/i>, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1982."},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[26] Gr\u00e4tzer, G., and H. Lakser, \u201cA note on the implicational class generated by a class of structures,\u201d <i>Canadian Mathematical Bulletin<\/i>, vol. 16 (1973), pp. 603\u20135.","DOI":"10.4153\/CMB-1973-100-4"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] Herrmann, B., \u201cCharacterizing equivalential and algebraizable logics by the Leibniz operator,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 58 (1997), pp. 305\u201323.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1004979825733"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[28] Hsieh, A., and J. G. Raftery, \u201cConserving involution in residuated structures,\u201d <i>Mathematical Logic Quarterly<\/i>, vol. 53 (2007), pp. 583\u2013609.","DOI":"10.1002\/malq.200610052"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[29] Lorenzen, P., <i>Einf\u00fchrung in die operative Logik und Mathematik<\/i>, vol. 78 of <i>Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften<\/i>, Springer, Berlin, 1955.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-01539-1"},{"key":"30","unstructured":"[30] \u0141o\u015b, J., <i>O matrycach logicznych<\/i>, vol. 19 of <i>Travaux de la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des Sciences et des Lettres de Wroclaw, S\u00e9rie B<\/i>, Wroclaw, 1949."},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[31] \u0141o\u015b, J., and R. Suszko, \u201cRemarks on sentential logics,\u201d <i>Indigationes Mathematicae (N.S.)<\/i>, vol. 20 (1958), pp. 177\u201383.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1385-7258(58)50024-9"},{"key":"32","unstructured":"[32] Makinson, D., \u201cA characterization of structural completeness of a structural consequence operation,\u201d <i>Reports on Mathematical Logic<\/i>, vol. 6 (1976), pp. 99\u2013101."},{"key":"33","unstructured":"[33] Maksimova, L., D. Skvorcov, and V. B. Shehtman, \u201cImpossibility of finite axiomatization of Medvedev\u2019s logic of finite problems,\u201d <i>Soviet Mathematics Doklady<\/i>, vol. 20 (1979), pp. 394\u201398."},{"key":"34","unstructured":"[34] Malinowski, J., <i>Equivalence in Intensional Logics<\/i>, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Warsaw, 1989."},{"key":"35","unstructured":"[35] Maltsev, A. I., \u201cSeveral remarks on quasivarieties of algebraic systems,\u201d <i>Algebra i Logika<\/i>, vol. 5 (1966), pp. 3\u20139."},{"key":"36","unstructured":"[36] Maltsev, A. I., <i>Algebraic Systems<\/i>, vol. 192 of <i>Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften<\/i>, Springer, Berlin, 1973."},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[37] Mares, E. D., and R. K. Meyer, \u201cRelevant logics,\u201d pp. 280\u2013308 in <i>The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic<\/i>, edited by L. Goble, Blackwell, Oxford, 2001.","DOI":"10.1111\/b.9780631206934.2001.00016.x"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[38] McKay, C. G., \u201cThe decidability of certain intermediate propositional logics,\u201d <i>Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 33 (1968), pp. 258\u201364.","DOI":"10.2307\/2269871"},{"key":"39","unstructured":"[39] Meyer, R. K., \u201c$R_{I}$\u2014the bounds of finitude,\u201d <i>Zeitschrift f\u00fcr mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik<\/i>, vol. 16 (1970), pp. 385\u20137."},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[40] Meyer, R. K., \u201cConservative extension in relevant implication,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 31 (1973), pp. 39\u201348.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02120525"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[41] Meyer, R. K., \u201cImproved decision procedures for pure relevant logic,\u201d pp. 191\u2013217 in <i>Logic, Meaning and Computation<\/i>, edited by C. A. Anderson and M. Zeleny, vol. 305 of <i>Synthese Library<\/i>, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-0526-5_9"},{"key":"42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[42] Meyer, R. K., and J. M. Dunn, \u201cE, R and $\\gamma$,\u201d <i>Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 34 (1969), pp. 460\u201374.","DOI":"10.2307\/2270909"},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[43] Meyer, R. K., J. M. Dunn, and H. Leblanc, \u201cCompleteness of relevant quantification theories,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 15 (1974), pp. 97\u2013121.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093891202"},{"key":"44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[44] Meyer, R. K., and H. Ono, \u201cThe finite model property for $\\mathrm{BCK}$ and $\\mathrm{BCIW}$,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 53 (1994), pp. 107\u201318.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01053025"},{"key":"45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[45] Olson, J. S., and J. G. Raftery, \u201cPositive Sugihara monoids,\u201d <i>Algebra Universalis<\/i>, vol. 57 (2007), pp. 75\u201399.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00012-007-2022-4"},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[46] Olson, J. S., J. G. Raftery, and C. J. van Alten, \u201cStructural completeness in substructural logics,\u201d <i>Logic Journal of the IGPL<\/i>, vol. 16 (2008), pp. 455\u201395.","DOI":"10.1093\/jigpal\/jzn014"},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[47] Ono, H., \u201cProof-theoretic methods in nonclassical logic\u2014an introduction,\u201d pp. 207\u201354 in <i>Theories of Types and Proofs (Tokyo, 1997)<\/i>, edited by M. Takahashi, M. Okada, and M. Dezani-Ciancaglini, vol. 2 of <i>MSJ Memoirs<\/i>, Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1998.","DOI":"10.2969\/msjmemoirs\/00201C060"},{"key":"48","unstructured":"[48] Pigozzi, D., \u201cAbstract algebraic logic,\u201d pp. 2\u201313 in <i>Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, Supplement III<\/i>, edited by M. Hazewinkel, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001."},{"key":"49","unstructured":"[49] Pogorzelski, W. A., \u201cStructural completeness of the propositional calculus,\u201d <i>Bulletin de l\u2019Acad\u00e9mie Polonaise des Sciences, S\u00e9rie des sciences math\u00e9matiques, astronomiques et physiques<\/i>, vol. 19 (1971), pp. 349\u201351."},{"key":"50","unstructured":"[50] Pogorzelski, W. A., and P. Wojtylak, <i>Completeness Theory for Propositional Logics<\/i>, <i>Studies in Universal Logic<\/i>, Birkh\u00e4user, Basel, 2008."},{"key":"51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[51] Prucnal, T., \u201cOn the structural completeness of some pure implicational propositional calculi,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 30 (1972), pp. 45\u201352.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02120824"},{"key":"52","unstructured":"[52] Prucnal, T., \u201cStructural completeness of Medvedev\u2019s propositional calculus,\u201d <i>Reports on Mathematical Logic<\/i>, vol. 6 (1976), pp. 103\u20135."},{"key":"53","unstructured":"[53] Prucnal, T., \u201cStructural completeness of some fragments of intermediate logics,\u201d <i>Bulletin of the Section of Logic<\/i>, vol. 12 (1983), pp. 41\u20134."},{"key":"54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[54] Prucnal, T., \u201cStructural completeness of purely implicational intermediate logics,\u201d pp. 31\u201341 in <i>Foundations of Logic and Linguistics (Salzburg, 1983)<\/i>, edited by G. Dorn and P. Weingartner, Plenum, New York, 1985.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-0548-2_3"},{"key":"55","unstructured":"[55] Prucnal, T., and A. Wro\u0144ski, \u201cAn algebraic characterization of the notion of structural completeness,\u201d <i>Bulletin of the Section of Logic<\/i>, vol. 3 (1974), pp. 30\u20133."},{"key":"56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[56] Raftery, J. G., \u201cCorrespondences between Gentzen and Hilbert systems,\u201d <i>Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 71 (2006), pp. 903\u201357.","DOI":"10.2178\/jsl\/1154698583"},{"key":"57","unstructured":"[57] Raftery, J. G., \u201cThe equational definability of truth predicates,\u201d <i>Reports on Mathematical Logic<\/i>, vol. 41 (2006), pp. 95\u2013149."},{"key":"58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[58] Raftery, J. G., \u201cA non-finitary sentential logic that is elementarily algebraizable,\u201d <i>Journal of Logic and Computation<\/i>, vol. 20 (2010), pp. 969\u201375.","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exn087"},{"key":"59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[59] Raftery, J. G., \u201cA perspective on the algebra of logic,\u201d <i>Quaestiones Mathematicae<\/i>, vol. 34 (2011), pp. 275\u2013325.","DOI":"10.2989\/16073606.2011.622856"},{"key":"60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[60] Raftery, J. G., \u201cOrder algebraizable logics,\u201d <i>Annals of Pure and Applied Logic<\/i>, vol. 164 (2013), pp. 251\u201383.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apal.2012.10.013"},{"key":"61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[61] Restall, G., \u201cRelevant and substructural logics,\u201d pp. 289\u2013398 in <i>Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Logic<\/i>, edited by D. Gabbay and J. Woods, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1874-5857(06)80030-0"},{"key":"62","unstructured":"[62] Rybakov, V. V., <i>Admissibility of Logical Inference Rules<\/i>, vol. 136 of <i>Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics<\/i>, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1997."},{"key":"63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[63] Shoesmith, D. J., and T. J. Smiley, <i>Multiple-Conclusion Logic<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511565687"},{"key":"64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[64] Slaney, J. K., and R. K. Meyer, \u201cA structurally complete fragment of relevant logic,\u201d <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 33 (1992), pp. 561\u20136.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093634487"},{"key":"65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[65] Urquhart, A., \u201cThe complexity of decision procedures in relevance logic, II,\u201d <i>Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 1774\u2013802.","DOI":"10.2307\/2586811"},{"key":"66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[66] van Alten, C. J., and J. G. Raftery, \u201cRule separation and embedding theorems for logics without weakening,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 76 (2004), pp. 241\u201374.","DOI":"10.1023\/B:STUD.0000032087.02579.e2"},{"key":"67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[67] W\u00f3jcicki, R., \u201cMatrix approach in methodology of sentential calculi,\u201d <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 32 (1973), pp. 7\u201339.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02123806"},{"key":"68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[68] W\u00f3jcicki, R., <i>Theory of Logical Calculi: Basic Theory of Consequence Operations<\/i>, vol. 199 of <i>Synthese Library<\/i>, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-6942-2"},{"key":"69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[69] Wolter, F., and M. Zakharyaschev, \u201cUndecidability of the unification and admissibility problems for modal and description logics,\u201d <i>ACM Transactions on Computational Logic<\/i>, vol. 9 (2008), no. 4, art. ID rnm25.","DOI":"10.1145\/1380572.1380574"},{"key":"70","unstructured":"[70] Wro\u0144ski, A., \u201cThe degree of completeness of some fragments of the intuitionistic propositional logic,\u201d <i>Reports on Mathematical Logic<\/i>, vol. 2 (1974), pp. 55\u201361."},{"key":"71","unstructured":"[71] Wro\u0144ski, A., \u201cReflections and distensions of BCK-algebras,\u201d <i>Mathematica Japonica<\/i>, vol. 28 (1983), pp. 215\u201325."},{"key":"72","unstructured":"[72] Wro\u0144ski, A., \u201cOverflow rules and a weakening of structural completeness,\u201d pp. 67\u201371 in <i>Rozwa\u017cania o Filozofii Prawdziwej: Jerzemu Perzanowskiemu w Darze<\/i>, edited by J. Sytnik-Czetwerty\u0144ski, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiello\u0144skiego, Krak\u00f3w, 2009."}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1215\/00294527-3671151","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T20:58:47Z","timestamp":1706648327000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-57\/issue-4\/Admissible-Rules-and-the-Leibniz-Hierarchy\/10.1215\/00294527-3671151.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00294527-3671151","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]]}}}