{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T04:36:45Z","timestamp":1773549405461,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Japanese Circulation Society","issue":"10","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Circ J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"DOI":"10.1253\/circj.cj-16-1319","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,24]],"date-time":"2017-04-24T18:10:10Z","timestamp":1493057410000},"page":"1477-1483","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Diagnostic Accuracy of Endocardial-to-Epicardial Myocardial Blood Flow Ratio for the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease With Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Dual-Source Computed Tomography"],"prefix":"10.1253","volume":"81","author":[{"given":"Yoshitaka","family":"Goto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kakuya","family":"Kitagawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mio","family":"Uno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shiro","family":"Nakamori","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tatsuro","family":"Ito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naoki","family":"Nagasawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kaoru","family":"Dohi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Cardiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hajime","family":"Sakuma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"330","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. <i>N Engl J Med<\/i> 2008; 359: 2324\u20132336.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0806576"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol<\/i> 2008; 52: 1724\u20131732.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2008.07.031"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: Computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol<\/i> 2008; 52: 636\u2013643.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2008.05.024"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4. Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, Becker A, Becker CR, Schmidt B, et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: Initial experience. <i>Eur Radiol<\/i> 2010; 20: 1168\u20131173.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1715-9"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5. Dwivedi G, Dowsley TF, Chow BJ. Assessment of cardiac computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging: Promise and challenges. <i>Circ J<\/i> 2012; 76: 544\u2013552.","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-11-1427"},{"key":"6","unstructured":"6. Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, Davies LC, van Geuns RJ, Anagnostopoulos C, et al. Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: Does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? <i>Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging<\/i> 2014; 15: 85\u201394."},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7. Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A, Hildebrandt K, Bauner K, Schwarz F, et al. Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. <i>JACC Cardiovasc Imaging<\/i> 2014; 7: 267\u2013277.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcmg.2013.06.008"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8. Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F, Tittus J, Schwarz F, D\u2019Anastasi M, et al. CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. <i>Heart<\/i> 2013; 99: 1004\u20131011.","DOI":"10.1136\/heartjnl-2013-303794"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. <i>JACC Cardiovasc Imaging<\/i> 2010; 3: 811\u2013820.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcmg.2010.05.009"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, Zeng Y, Jing H, Schoepf UJ, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: Comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. <i>Am J Roentgenol<\/i> 2012; 198: 521\u2013529.","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.7830"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11. Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol<\/i> 1990; 15: 459\u2013474.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(10)80078-6"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12. Chareonthaitawee P, Kaufmann PA, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans. <i>Cardiovasc Res<\/i> 2001; 50: 151\u2013161.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0008-6363(01)00202-4"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13. Liga R, Rovai D, Sampietro T, Vecoli C, Todiere G, Caselli C, et al. Insulin resistance is a major determinant of myocardial blood flow impairment in anginal patients. <i>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging<\/i> 2013; 40: 1905\u20131913.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-013-2523-7"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14. Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Appelman YE, Harms HJ, de Haan S, van den Oever ML, et al. Coronary risk factors and myocardial blood flow in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: A quantitative [15O]H<sub>2<\/sub>O PET\/CT study. <i>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging<\/i> 2012; 39: 102\u2013112.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-011-1956-0"},{"key":"15","unstructured":"15. Kaufmann PA, Camici PG. Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: Technical aspects and clinical applications. <i>J Nucl Med<\/i> 2005; 46: 75\u201388."},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1: Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. <i>Circulation<\/i> 1977; 56: 786\u2013794.","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.56.5.786"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17. Mordini FE, Haddad T, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Lowrey TB, Aletras AH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: Fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment. <i>JACC Cardiovasc Imaging<\/i> 2014; 7: 14\u201322.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcmg.2013.08.014"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. <i>J Cardiovasc Magn Reson<\/i> 2013; 15: 91.","DOI":"10.1186\/1532-429X-15-91"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19. Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers. <i>J Nucl Cardiol<\/i> 2016; 23: 606\u2013639.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12350-015-0387-x"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"20. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von Ziegler F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: Incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. <i>Radiology<\/i> 2011; 260: 689\u2013698.","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11110638"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21. Greess H, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Baum U, Lell M, Bowing B, et al. Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). <i>Eur Radiol<\/i> 2002; 12: 1571\u20131576.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-001-1255-4"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22. Fujita M, Kitagawa K, Ito T, Shiraishi Y, Kurobe Y, Nagata M, et al. Dose reduction in dynamic CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison of 80-kV\/370-mAs and 100-kV\/300-mAs protocols. <i>Eur Radiol<\/i> 2014; 24: 748\u2013755.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-3063-z"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23. Kurobe Y, Kitagawa K, Ito T, Kurita Y, Shiraishi Y, Nakamori S, et al. Myocardial delayed enhancement with dual-source CT: Advantages of targeted spatial frequency filtration and image averaging over half-scan reconstruction. <i>J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr<\/i> 2014; 8: 289\u2013298.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcct.2014.06.004"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"24. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, Schmidt B, Allmendinger T, Haberland U, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: Preliminary animal experience. <i>Invest Radiol<\/i> 2010; 45: 298\u2013305.","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0b013e3181dfa3cf"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang HJ, Bluemke DA, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: A pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. <i>Circ Cardiovasc Imaging<\/i> 2009; 2: 174\u2013182.","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCIMAGING.108.813766"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26. Kim RJ, Albert TS, Wible JH, Elliott MD, Allen JC, Lee JC, et al. Performance of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging with gadoversetamide contrast for the detection and assessment of myocardial infarction: An international, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial. <i>Circulation<\/i> 2008; 117: 629\u2013637.","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.723262"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"27. Schelbert EB, Cao JJ, Sigurdsson S, Aspelund T, Kellman P, Aletras AH, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction determined by cardiac magnetic resonance in older adults. <i>JAMA<\/i> 2012; 308: 890\u2013896.","DOI":"10.1001\/2012.jama.11089"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Leung M, Antonis PR, Nasis A, et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: A comparison with fractional flow reserve. <i>Eur Heart J<\/i> 2012; 33: 67\u201377.","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehr268"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol<\/i> 2010; 55: 2816\u20132821.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2009.11.096"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. <i>Eur Heart J<\/i> 2013; 34: 2949\u20133003.","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/eht296"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF\/AHA\/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation\/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol<\/i> 2011; 58: e44\u2013e122.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2011.08.007"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"32. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van\u2019t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. <i>N Engl J Med<\/i> 2009; 360: 213\u2013224.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0807611"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. <i>Biometrics<\/i> 1988; 44: 837\u2013845.","DOI":"10.2307\/2531595"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"34. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. <i>Radiology<\/i> 1982; 143: 29\u201336.","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.143.1.7063747"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"35. Tanabe Y, Kido T, Kurata A, Uetani T, Fukuyama N, Yokoi T, et al. Optimal scan time for single-phase myocardial computed tomography perfusion to detect myocardial ischemia- derivation cohort from dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion. <i>Circ J<\/i> 2016; 80: 2506\u20132512.","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-16-0834"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"36. Hautvast GL, Chiribiri A, Lockie T, Breeuwer M, Nagel E, Plein S. Quantitative analysis of transmural gradients in myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance images. <i>Magn Reson Med<\/i> 2011; 66: 1477\u20131487.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.22930"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37. Wichmann JL, Meinel FG, Schoepf UJ, Lo GG, Choe YH, Wang Y, et al. Absolute versus relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with anatomic coronary artery disease. <i>Am J Roentgenol<\/i> 2015; 205: W67\u2013W72.","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.14.14087"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"38. Kono AK, Coenen A, Lubbers M, Kurata A, Rossi A, Dharampal A, et al. Relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic computed tomographic perfusion imaging predicts hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis better than absolute blood flow. <i>Invest Radiol<\/i> 2014; 49: 801\u2013807.","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000087"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"39. Rief M, Zimmermann E, Stenzel F, Martus P, Stangl K, Greupner J, et al. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: Prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography. <i>J Am Coll Cardiol<\/i> 2013; 62: 1476\u20131485.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2013.03.088"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"40. Matsuo H, Watanabe S, Kadosaki T, Yamaki T, Tanaka S, Miyata S, et al. Validation of collateral fractional flow reserve by myocardial perfusion imaging. <i>Circulation<\/i> 2002; 105: 1060\u20131065.","DOI":"10.1161\/hc0902.104719"}],"container-title":["Circulation Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/circj\/81\/10\/81_CJ-16-1319\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,21]],"date-time":"2019-09-21T16:07:04Z","timestamp":1569082024000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/circj\/81\/10\/81_CJ-16-1319\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1253\/circj.cj-16-1319","relation":{},"ISSN":["1346-9843","1347-4820"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1346-9843","type":"print"},{"value":"1347-4820","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}