{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T10:40:25Z","timestamp":1761561625182},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1016","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,1]],"date-time":"2012-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1343779200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: To compare a 2 day bowel preparation regime of barium, iodine and a mild stimulant laxative with a 1 day iodine-only regime for CT colonography (CTC).<\/jats:p>\n               <jats:p>Methods: 100 consecutive patients underwent CTC. The first 50 patients (Regime 1) ingested 1 bisacodyl tablet twice a day 3 days before CTC and 1 dose each of 50 ml of barium and 20 ml of iodinated contrast per day starting 2 days before CTC. The second 50 patients (Regime 2) ingested 3 doses of iodinated contrast over 24 h prior to CTC. Volumes of residual stool and fluid, and the effectiveness of stool and fluid tagging, were graded according to methods established by Taylor et al (Taylor S, Slaker A, Burling D, Tam E, Greenhalgh R, Gartner L, et al. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 32\u201342). A 3 day low-residue diet was taken by both cohorts. Questionnaires rating the side-effects and burden of the bowel preparation were compared to a control cohort of patients undergoing barium enema.<\/jats:p>\n               <jats:p>Results: The proportion of colons producing none\/scattered stool (score 1) was 90.3% with Regime 1 and 65.0% with Regime 2 (p&amp;lt;0.005). Any residual stool was significantly better tagged with Regime 1 (score 5), with 91.7% of Regime 1 exhibiting optimum tagging vs 71.3% of Regime 2 (p&amp;lt;0.05). No significant differences in side-effects between the bowel preparation regimes for CTC were elicited. Bowel preparation for barium enema was tolerated significantly worse than both of the CTC bowel preparation regimes.<\/jats:p>\n               <jats:p>Conclusion: Regime 1, containing a 3 day preparation of a mild laxative, barium and iodine, produced a significantly better prepared colon, with no difference in patient acceptability.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/22421731","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,3,15]],"date-time":"2012-03-15T07:30:37Z","timestamp":1331796637000},"page":"1085-1092","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"85","author":[{"given":"A","family":"Pollentine","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A","family":"Mortimer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P","family":"Mccoubrie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L","family":"Archer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024050213282961100_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-010-9650-4","article-title":"CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing.","volume":"36","author":"Buccicardi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Abdom Imaging"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2008.12.027","article-title":"Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.","volume":"16","author":"Nagata","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3186","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2002.07129.x","article-title":"A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.","volume":"97","author":"Harewood","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2003.07302.x","article-title":"Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy and bowel preparation.","volume":"98","author":"Ristvedt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2008.03837.x","article-title":"Systematic review: adverse event reports for oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol.","volume":"29","author":"Belsey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2222010669","article-title":"Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.","volume":"222","author":"Svensson","year":"2002","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2272020293","article-title":"Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perspectives and preferences.","volume":"227","author":"Gluecker","year":"2003","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1403","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa070543","article-title":"CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.","volume":"357","author":"Kim","year":"2007","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.3128","article-title":"Image quality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxatives for CT colonography.","volume":"191","author":"Jensch","year":"2008","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2241011222","article-title":"Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results\u2014polyp detection and patient acceptance.","volume":"224","author":"Lefere","year":"2002","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2263012059","article-title":"CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction: initial observations.","volume":"226","author":"Zalis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.219.3.r01jn22693","article-title":"CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study.","volume":"219","author":"Callstrom","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2700","article-title":"Non-cathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction.","volume":"190","author":"Johnson","year":"2008","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-009-1570-8","article-title":"CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and two iodine-based preparation schemes.","volume":"20","author":"Liedenbaum","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2010.06.016","article-title":"Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance.","volume":"66","author":"Liedenbaum","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2004.07.006","article-title":"Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema.","volume":"60","author":"Taylor","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1531","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.2342","article-title":"CT colonography with decreased purgation: balancing preparation, performance and patient acceptance.","volume":"193","author":"Mahgerefteh","year":"2009","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1836","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.184.6.01841836","article-title":"CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced volume of barium.","volume":"184","author":"Lefere","year":"2005","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-007-0631-0","article-title":"CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.","volume":"18","author":"Taylor","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.313.7059.727","article-title":"Bowel preparation at home: prospective study of adverse effects in elderly people.","volume":"313","author":"Heymann","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-009-1517-0","article-title":"CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.","volume":"20","author":"Jensch","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2331031208","article-title":"CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study.","volume":"233","author":"van Gelder","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b23","first-page":"104","article-title":"Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: evidence against 5-point scales.","volume":"5","author":"Finstad","year":"2010","journal-title":"JUS"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.25.1.69","article-title":"Variables in the preparation of the large intestine for double contrast barium enema examination.","volume":"25","author":"Lee","year":"1984","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W31","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.09.3572","article-title":"Low-fiber diet in limited bowel preparation for CT colonography: influence on image quality and patient acceptance.","volume":"195","author":"Lindenbaum","year":"2010","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1300","DOI":"10.1053\/j.gastro.2004.08.025","article-title":"Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps.","volume":"127","author":"Iannaccone","year":"2004","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-006-9044-9","article-title":"Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fibre diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.","volume":"32","author":"Dachmann","year":"2007","journal-title":"Abdom Imaging"},{"key":"2024050213282961100_b28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0800996","article-title":"Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.","volume":"359","author":"Johnson","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["The British Journal of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article-pdf\/85\/1016\/1085\/57386685\/bjr_22421731.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article-pdf\/85\/1016\/1085\/57386685\/bjr_22421731.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,2]],"date-time":"2024-05-02T13:31:40Z","timestamp":1714656700000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article\/85\/1016\/1085\/7450621"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,1]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1016","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,5]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr\/22421731","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1285"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1285","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,1]]}}}