{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T02:50:30Z","timestamp":1787021430189,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1097","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]],"date-time":"2019-04-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554249600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/journals\/pages\/open_access\/funder_policies\/chorus\/standard_publication_model"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Compare conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT (CEbCT), tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>100 females with BI-RADS 4\/5 lesions underwent CEbCT and\/or DBT prior to biopsy in this IRB approved, HIPAA compliant study. Two breast radiologists adjudicated lesion conspicuity scores (CS) for each modality independently. Data are shown as mean CS \u00b1standard deviation. Two-sided t-test was used to determine significance between two modalities within each subgroup. Multiple comparisons were controlled by the false-discovery rate set to 5%.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>50% of studied lesions were biopsy-confirmed malignancies. Malignant masses were more conspicuous on CEbCT than on DBT or DM (9.7\u2009\u00b10.5, n = 25; 6.8\u2009\u00b1\u20093.1, n = 15; 6.7\u2009\u00b1\u20093.0, n = 27; p &amp;lt; 0.05). Malignant calcifications were equally conspicuous on all three modalities (CEbCT 8.7\u2009\u00b1\u20090.8, n = 18; DBT 8.5\u2009\u00b1\u20090.6, n = 15; DM 8.8\u2009\u00b1\u20090.7, n = 23; p = NS). Benign masses were equally conspicuous on CEbCT (6.6\u2009\u00b1\u20094.1, n = 22); DBT (6.4\u2009\u00b1\u20093.8, n = 17); DM (5.9\u2009\u00b1\u20093.6, n = 24; p = NS). Benign calcifications CS were similar between DBT (8.5\u2009\u00b1\u20091.0, n = 17) and DM (8.8\u2009\u00b1\u20090.8, n = 26; p = NS) but less conspicuous on CEbCT (4.0\u2009\u00b1\u20092.9, n = 25, p &amp;lt; 0.001). 55 females were imaged with all modalities. Results paralleled the entire cohort. 69%(n = 62) of females imaged by CEbCT had dense breasts. Benign\/malignant lesion CSs in dense\/non-dense categories were 4.8\u2009\u00b1\u20093.7, n = 33, vs 6.0\u2009\u00b1\u20093.9, n = 14, p = 0.35; 9.2\u2009\u00b1\u20090.9, n = 29 vs. 9.4\u2009\u00b1\u20090.7, n = 14; p = 0.29, respectively.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Malignant masses are more conspicuous on CEbCT than DM or DBT. Malignant microcalcifications are equally conspicuous on all three modalities. Benign calcifications remain better visualized by DM and DBT than with CEbCT. We observed no differences in benign masses on all modalities. CS of both benign and malignant lesions were independent of breast density.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Advances in knowledge:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>CEbCT is a promising diagnostic imaging modality for suspicious breast lesions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20181034","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,27]],"date-time":"2019-02-27T11:48:50Z","timestamp":1551268130000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"92","author":[{"given":"Shadi","family":"Aminololama-Shakeri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center , California , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Craig K.","family":"Abbey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara , California , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Javier E","family":"L\u00f3pez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Internal Medicine Department, Cardiovascular Division, University of California Davis Medical Center , California , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew M","family":"Hernandez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center , California , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peymon","family":"Gazi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center , California , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John M","family":"Boone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center , California , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen K","family":"Lindfors","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center , California , USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024050214473843000_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10092311","article-title":"Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience","volume":"256","author":"Prionas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.09.020","article-title":"Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomography","volume":"85","author":"Aminololama-Shakeri","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121373","article-title":"Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program","volume":"267","author":"Skaane","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2499","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.6095","article-title":"Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography","volume":"311","author":"Friedewald","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.08.2031","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study","volume":"193","author":"Gur","year":"2009","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1545","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-009-1699-5","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study","volume":"20","author":"Gennaro","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120674","article-title":"Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial","volume":"266","author":"Rafferty","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1074","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/53282892","article-title":"Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy","volume":"85","author":"Svahn","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.8881","article-title":"Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting","volume":"200","author":"Brandt","year":"2013","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11101763","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization","volume":"262","author":"Noroozian","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120552","article-title":"Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions","volume":"266","author":"Zuley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2014.06.005","article-title":"The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography","volume":"69","author":"Morel","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.4656","article-title":"Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison","volume":"196","author":"Spangler","year":"2011","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1784","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.1708","article-title":"Breast cancer screening using Tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and Nondense breasts","volume":"315","author":"Rafferty","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b15","volume-title":"Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-Breast Imaging Atlas","author":"D'Orsi","year":"2003"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2400830","article-title":"Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner","volume":"34","author":"Kwan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1177\/153303461000900104","article-title":"An X-ray computed tomography\/positron emission tomography system designed specifically for breast imaging","volume":"9","author":"Boone","year":"2010","journal-title":"Technol Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1472499","article-title":"Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data","volume":"29","author":"Boone","year":"2002","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3767","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2128126","article-title":"Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT","volume":"32","author":"Boone","year":"2005","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"091501","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4892600","article-title":"Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee task group 223","volume":"41","author":"Sechopoulos","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1007\/s12609-016-0227-2","article-title":"Dedicated breast CT: screening technique of the future","volume":"8","author":"Aminololama-Shakeri","year":"2016","journal-title":"Curr Breast Cancer Rep"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280215577111","article-title":"A comparative review of methods for comparing means using partially paired data","volume":"26","author":"Guo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b23","first-page":"289","article-title":"Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society","author":"Benjamini","year":"1995","journal-title":"Series B"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61232-X","article-title":"MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study","volume":"370","author":"Kuhl","year":"2007","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1944-y","article-title":"Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results","volume":"21","author":"Dromain","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024050214473843000_b26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.09.019","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI","volume":"84","author":"Chou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"}],"container-title":["The British Journal of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article-pdf\/92\/1097\/20181034\/57377593\/bjr.20181034.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article-pdf\/92\/1097\/20181034\/57377593\/bjr.20181034.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,2]],"date-time":"2024-05-02T11:06:06Z","timestamp":1714647966000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article\/doi\/10.1259\/bjr.20181034\/7448846"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1097","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20181034","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1285","1748-880X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1285","type":"print"},{"value":"1748-880X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]]},"article-number":"20181034"}}