{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]],"date-time":"2026-01-06T13:27:11Z","timestamp":1767706031147,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"1150","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To assess the associations between objectively measured mammographic compression pressure and paddle tilt and breast cancer (BC) detected at the same (\u201ccontemporaneous\u201d) screen, subsequent screens, or in-between screens (interval cancers).<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Automated pressure and paddle tilt estimates were derived for 80,495 mammographic examinations in a UK population-based screening programme. Adjusted logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the associations of compression parameters with BC detected at contemporaneous screen (777 cases).<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>Nested case-control designs were used to estimate associations of pressure and tilt with: (a) interval cancer (148\u2009cases\/625 age-matched controls) and (b) subsequent screen-detected cancer (344\/1436), via conditional logistic regression.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Compression pressure was negatively associated with odds of BC at contemporaneous screen (odds ratio (OR) for top versus bottom third of the pressure distribution: 0.74; 95%\u2009CI 0.60, 0.92; P-for-linear-trend (Pt) = 0.007). There was weak evidence that moderate pressure at screening was associated with lower odds of interval cancer (OR for middle versus bottom third: 0.63; 95%\u2009CI 0.38, 1.05; p = 0.079), but no association was found between pressure and the odds of BC at subsequent screen. There was no evidence that paddle tilt was associated with the odds of contemporaneous, subsequent screen or interval cancer detection.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Findings are consistent with compression pressure, but not paddle tilt, affecting the performance of mammographic screening by interfering with its ability to detect cancers.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Advances in knowledge:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Inadequate or excessive compression pressure at screening may contribute to a reduced ability to detect cancers, resulting in a greater number of interval cancer cases.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20230085","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,3]],"date-time":"2023-09-03T21:42:15Z","timestamp":1693777335000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Are mammography image acquisition factors, compression pressure and paddle tilt, associated with breast cancer detection in screening?"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"96","author":[{"given":"Sue M","family":"Hudson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Louise S","family":"Wilkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oxford Breast Imaging Centre, Churchill Hospital,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bianca L","family":"De Stavola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Pop Health Sciences, Institute of Child Health, University College London , London, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Isabel","family":"dos-Santos-Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024050216075562800_b1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1778","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)61611-0","article-title":"The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review","volume":"380","author":"Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5104","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4960630","article-title":"Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion Detectability in Digital Mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms","volume":"43","author":"Salvagnini","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4464","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2977600","article-title":"The effect of breast compression on mass Conspicuity in Digital Mammography","volume":"35","author":"Saunders","year":"2008","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.10100655","article-title":"Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from Mammographic screening","volume":"258","author":"Yaffe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20230089","article-title":"To what extent are objectively measured Mammographic imaging techniques associated with compression outcomes","volume":"96","author":"Hudson","year":"2023","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2013.06.001","article-title":"Practitioner compression force variation in Mammography: A 6-year study","volume":"19","author":"Mercer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2014.12.012","article-title":"Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization","volume":"84","author":"Branderhorst","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0175781","article-title":"Mammographic compression in Asian women","volume":"12","author":"Lau","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2016.12.025","article-title":"Compression force and radiation dose in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program","volume":"88","author":"Waade","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"volume-title":"NHS Breast Screening Programme. NHS Breast Screening Programme Guidance for breast screening mammographers","year":"2017","key":"2024050216075562800_b10"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b11","unstructured":"Programmes \u00a0NCS\n          \n.\nQuality assurance guidelines for mammography including radiographic quality control\n. [\nContract No.: NHSBSP Publication No 63\n].\n2006\n."},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-017-4214-8","article-title":"Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program","volume":"163","author":"Moshina","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-017-0917-3","article-title":"Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based Mammography screening","volume":"19","author":"Holland","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","article-title":"Breast density and Parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"McCormack","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa062790","article-title":"Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer","volume":"356","author":"Boyd","year":"2007","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2461070200","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of Digital versus film Mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST","volume":"246","author":"Pisano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-017-0859-9","article-title":"The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study","volume":"19","author":"Wanders","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1038\/s41416-021-01466-y","article-title":"Quantitative breast density analysis to predict interval and node-positive cancers in pursuit of improved screening protocols: a case-control study","volume":"125","author":"Burnside","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1662","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-5104-5","article-title":"Breast compression parameters and Mammographic density in the Norwegian breast cancer screening programme","volume":"28","author":"Moshina","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b20","unstructured":"Oxford Uo\n          \n.\nAgeX trial\n.\nOxford\n:\nUniversity of Oxford\n.\n2020\n.\nAvailable from\n:\nhttp:\/\/www.agex.uk\/"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b21","unstructured":"Office for National Statistics (ONS)\n          \n.\nCensus Guidance and Methodology 2015 [Overview of methods and codes used for 2011 census\n.\n2011\n.\nAvailable from\n:\nhttps:\/\/www.ons.gov.uk\/census\/2011census\/2011censusdata\/2011censususerguide\/variablesandclassifications"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b22","unstructured":"The Royal College of Radiologists\n          \n.\nGuidance on screening and symptomatic breast imaging\n.\n2013\n."},{"volume-title":"VolparaDensity\u2122 User Manual Version 1.5.11","year":"2014","author":"Matakina Technology Ltd","key":"2024050216075562800_b23"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-018-1078-8","article-title":"Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric Mammographic density and breast cancer risk","volume":"20","author":"Hudson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"article-title":"Breast Screening programme England 2016-2017","year":"2018","author":"Health and Social Care Centre","key":"2024050216075562800_b25"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1117\/12.2625460","article-title":"Mammographic compression pressure as a predictor of interval cancer","author":"Hill","year":"2022"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b27","first-page":"19","article-title":"Breast Imaging","author":"Tingberg","year":"2016"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3663579","article-title":"The Readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film Mammography and full-field Digital Mammography units","volume":"39","author":"Hauge","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20140241","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20140241","article-title":"Extra patient movement during Mammographic imaging: an experimental study","volume":"87","author":"Ma","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"volume-title":"Mammographic Image Analysis","year":"2012","author":"Highnam","key":"2024050216075562800_b30"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3422-4","article-title":"Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality","volume":"25","author":"Broeders","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1764","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-13-1219","article-title":"Automated measurement of volumetric Mammographic density: A tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment","volume":"23","author":"Brand","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.15141686","article-title":"Reliability of automated breast density measurements","volume":"275","author":"Alonzo-Proulx","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020","article-title":"Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment","volume":"29","author":"Holland","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b35","unstructured":"Public Health England\n          \n.\nBreast Screening Programme, England Statistics for 2014-15 2016\n.\n2016\n.\nAvailable from\n:\nhttp:\/\/www.hscic.gov.uk\/pubs\/brstscreen1415"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2011.3","article-title":"Interval cancers in the NHS breast cancer screening programme in England","volume":"104","author":"Bennett","year":"2011","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"2024050216075562800_b37","first-page":"291","article-title":"Errors in Mammography cannot be solved through technology alone","volume":"19","author":"Ekpo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Asian Pac J Cancer Prev"}],"container-title":["The British Journal of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article-pdf\/96\/1150\/20230085\/57370660\/bjr.20230085.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article-pdf\/96\/1150\/20230085\/57370660\/bjr.20230085.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,2]],"date-time":"2024-05-02T18:30:54Z","timestamp":1714674654000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article\/doi\/10.1259\/bjr.20230085\/7499050"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,3]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1150","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,3]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20230085","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1285","1748-880X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0007-1285"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1748-880X"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,3]]},"article-number":"20230085"}}