{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,20]],"date-time":"2026-06-20T03:52:15Z","timestamp":1781927535079,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":103,"publisher":"Japanese Society of Animal Reproduction","issue":"3","funder":[{"name":"JSPS KAKENHI","award":["22HP2009"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["22HP2009"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Reprod. Dev.","Journal of Reproduction and Development"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"DOI":"10.1262\/jrd.2025-120","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T22:10:48Z","timestamp":1781734248000},"page":"172-181","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["When bovine life begins in a petri dish: transcriptomic insights from embryos to calves conceived <i>in vitro<\/i>"],"prefix":"10.1262","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"Maria Belen","family":"RABAGLINO","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"349","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1. eClinicalMedicine . The current status of IVF: are we putting the needs of the individual first? EClinicalMedicine<\/i> 2023; 65: 102343.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2023.102343"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2. Hansen PJ. Review: Some challenges and unrealized opportunities toward widespread use of the in vitro-produced embryo in cattle production. Animal<\/i> 2023; 17(Suppl 1): 100745.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.animal.2023.100745"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3. Crowe AD, Lonergan P, Butler ST. Invited review: Use of assisted reproduction techniques to accelerate genetic gain and increase value of beef production in dairy herds. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2021; 104: 12189\u201312206.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2021-20281"},{"key":"4","unstructured":"4. Viana J. Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. Embryo Technology Newsletter<\/i> 2024; 2025: 43."},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5. Rizos D, Ward F, Duffy P, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization or early embryo development in vitro versus in vivo: implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. Mol Reprod Dev<\/i> 2002; 61: 234\u2013248.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrd.1153"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6. Fair T, Carter F, Park S, Evans AC, Lonergan P. Global gene expression analysis during bovine oocyte in vitro maturation. Theriogenology<\/i> 2007; 68(Suppl 1): S91\u2013S97.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2007.04.018"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7. Mamo S, Carter F, Lonergan P, Leal CL, Al Naib A, McGettigan P, Mehta JP, Evans AC, Fair T. Sequential analysis of global gene expression profiles in immature and in vitro matured bovine oocytes: potential molecular markers of oocyte maturation. BMC Genomics<\/i> 2011; 12: 151.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2164-12-151"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8. Wrenzycki C, Stinshoff H. Maturation environment and impact on subsequent developmental competence of bovine oocytes. Reprod Domest Anim<\/i> 2013; 48(Suppl 1): 38\u201343.","DOI":"10.1111\/rda.12204"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9. Adona PR, Leal CL, Biase FH, De Bem TH, Mesquita LG, Meirelles FV, Ferraz AL, Furlan LR, Monzani PS, Guemra S. In vitro maturation alters gene expression in bovine oocytes. Zygote<\/i> 2016; 24: 624\u2013633.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0967199415000672"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10. Sirard MA. The influence of in vitro fertilization and embryo culture on the embryo epigenetic constituents and the possible consequences in the bovine model. J Dev Orig Health Dis<\/i> 2017; 8: 411\u2013417.","DOI":"10.1017\/S2040174417000125"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11. Cagnone G, Sirard MA. The embryonic stress response to in vitro culture: insight from genomic analysis. Reproduction<\/i> 2016; 152: R247\u2013R261.","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-16-0391"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet<\/i> 2009; 10: 57\u201363.","DOI":"10.1038\/nrg2484"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13. Rabaglino MB. Review: Overview of the transcriptomic landscape in bovine blastocysts and elongated conceptuses driving developmental competence. Animal<\/i> 2023; 17(Suppl 1): 100733.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.animal.2023.100733"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14. Hansen PJ. The incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle-why aren\u2019t pregnancy rates greater and what can we do about it? J Anim Sci<\/i> 2020; 98: 1\u201320.","DOI":"10.1093\/jas\/skaa288"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15. Crowe AD, S\u00e1nchez JM, Moore SG, McDonald M, Rodrigues R, Morales MF, Orsi de Freitas L, Randi F, Furlong J, Browne JA, Rabaglino MB, Lonergan P, Butler ST. Fertility in seasonal-calving pasture-based lactating dairy cows following timed artificial insemination or timed embryo transfer with fresh or frozen in vitro-produced embryos. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2024; 107: 1788\u20131804.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2023-23520"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16. Ealy AD, Wooldridge LK, McCoski SR. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle. J Anim Sci<\/i> 2019; 97: 2555\u20132568.","DOI":"10.1093\/jas\/skz116"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17. Crowe AD, S\u00e1nchez JM, Moore SG, McDonald M, McCabe MS, Randi F, Lonergan P, Butler ST. Incidence and timing of pregnancy loss following timed artificial insemination or timed embryo transfer with a fresh or frozen in vitro-produced embryo. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2025; 108: 1022\u20131038.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2024-25139"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18. Kopecn\u00fd V, Fl\u00e9chon JE, Camous S, Fulka J Jr. Nucleologenesis and the onset of transcription in the eight-cell bovine embryo: fine-structural autoradiographic study. Mol Reprod Dev<\/i> 1989; 1: 79\u201390.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrd.1080010202"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19. Frei RE, Schultz GA, Church RB. Qualitative and quantitative changes in protein synthesis occur at the 8-16-cell stage of embryogenesis in the cow. J Reprod Fertil<\/i> 1989; 86: 637\u2013641.","DOI":"10.1530\/jrf.0.0860637"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"20. Saint-Dizier M, Souza-Fabjan JMG, Reynaud K, Mermillod P, Almi\u00f1ana C, Bauersachs S, Mah\u00e9 C. Oviduct epithelium interactions: roles in sperm selection and embryo quality. Anim Reprod<\/i> 2025; 22: e20250035.","DOI":"10.1590\/1984-3143-ar2025-0035"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21. Ferraz MAMM, Henning HHW, Stout TAE, Vos PLAM, Gadella BM. Designing 3-dimensional in vitro oviduct culture systems to study mammalian fertilization and embryo production. Ann Biomed Eng<\/i> 2017; 45: 1731\u20131744.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10439-016-1760-x"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22. Pranomphon T, L\u00f3pez-Vali\u00f1as \u00c1, Almi\u00f1ana C, Mah\u00e9 C, Brair VL, Parnpai R, Mermillod P, Bauersachs S, Saint-Dizier M. Oviduct epithelial spheroids during in vitro culture of bovine embryos mitigate oxidative stress, improve blastocyst quality and change the embryonic transcriptome. Biol Res<\/i> 2024; 57: 73.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40659-024-00555-5"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23. Gad A, Hoelker M, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Cinar U, Rings F, Held E, Dufort I, Sirard MA, Schellander K, Tesfaye D. Molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in bovine embryonic genome activation and their regulation by alternative in vivo and in vitro culture conditions. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2012; 87: 100.","DOI":"10.1095\/biolreprod.112.099697"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"24. Leroy JL, Opsomer G, De Vliegher S, Vanholder T, Goossens L, Geldhof A, Bols PE, de Kruif A, Van Soom A. Comparison of embryo quality in high-yielding dairy cows, in dairy heifers and in beef cows. Theriogenology<\/i> 2005; 64: 2022\u20132036.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2005.05.003"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25. Rabaglino MB, Forde N, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Blum H, Graf A, Wolf E, Lonergan P. Maternal metabolic status and in-vitro culture conditions during embryonic genome activation deregulate the expression of energy-related genes in the bovine 16-cells embryo. PLoS One<\/i> 2023; 18: e0290689.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0290689"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26. Wu C, Sirard MA. Parental effects on epigenetic programming in gametes and embryos of dairy cows. Front Genet<\/i> 2020; 11: 557846.","DOI":"10.3389\/fgene.2020.557846"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"27. Driver AM, Pe\u00f1agaricano F, Huang W, Ahmad KR, Hackbart KS, Wiltbank MC, Khatib H. RNA-Seq analysis uncovers transcriptomic variations between morphologically similar in vivo- and in vitro-derived bovine blastocysts. BMC Genomics<\/i> 2012; 13: 118.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2164-13-118"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28. Corcoran D, Fair T, Park S, Rizos D, Patel OV, Smith GW, Coussens PM, Ireland JJ, Boland MP, Evans AC, Lonergan P. Suppressed expression of genes involved in transcription and translation in in vitro compared with in vivo cultured bovine embryos. Reproduction<\/i> 2006; 131: 651\u2013660.","DOI":"10.1530\/rep.1.01015"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29. Sudano MJ, Caixeta ES, Paschoal DM, Martins A Jr, Machado R, Buratini J, Landim-Alvarenga FD. Cryotolerance and global gene-expression patterns of Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus in vitro- and in vivo-produced blastocysts. Reprod Fertil Dev<\/i> 2014; 26: 1129\u20131141.","DOI":"10.1071\/RD13099"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30. Clemente M, Lopez-Vidriero I, O\u2019Gaora P, Mehta JP, Forde N, Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Transcriptome changes at the initiation of elongation in the bovine conceptus. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2011; 85: 285\u2013295.","DOI":"10.1095\/biolreprod.111.091587"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31. Kepkova KV, Vodicka P, Toralova T, Lopatarova M, Cech S, Dolezel R, Havlicek V, Besenfelder U, Kuzmany A, Sirard MA, Laurincik J, Kanka J. Transcriptomic analysis of in vivo and in vitro produced bovine embryos revealed a developmental change in cullin 1 expression during maternal-to-embryonic transition. Theriogenology<\/i> 2011; 75: 1582\u20131595.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2010.12.019"},{"key":"32","unstructured":"32. Nagatomo H, Akizawa H, Sada A, Kishi Y, Yamanaka K, Takuma T, Sasaki K, Yamauchi N, Yanagawa Y, Nagano M, Kono T, Takahashi M, Kawahara M. Comparing spatial expression dynamics of bovine blastocyst under three different procedures: in-vivo, in-vitro derived, and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Jpn J Vet Res<\/i> 2015; 63: 159\u2013171."},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33. Noguchi T, Aizawa T, Munakata Y, Iwata H. Comparison of gene expression and mitochondria number between bovine blastocysts obtained in vitro<\/i> and in vivo<\/i>. J Reprod Dev<\/i> 2020; 66: 35\u201339.","DOI":"10.1262\/jrd.2019-100"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"34. Neufeld G, Lancheros-Buitrago J, Jung K, Klein C. Meta-analysis of the effects of bovine in vitro embryo production on gene expression. Animal<\/i> 2026; 20: 101721.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.animal.2025.101721"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"35. Leese HJ. Quiet please, do not disturb: a hypothesis of embryo metabolism and viability. BioEssays<\/i> 2002; 24: 845\u2013849.","DOI":"10.1002\/bies.10137"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"36. Leese HJ, Brison DR, Sturmey RG. The quiet embryo hypothesis: 20 years on. Front Physiol<\/i> 2022; 13: 899485.","DOI":"10.3389\/fphys.2022.899485"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37. Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci<\/i> 2016; 41: 211\u2013218.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tibs.2015.12.001"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"38. Krisher RL, Prather RS. A role for the Warburg effect in preimplantation embryo development: metabolic modification to support rapid cell proliferation. Mol Reprod Dev<\/i> 2012; 79: 311\u2013320.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrd.22037"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"39. Ming H, Zhang M, Rajput S, Logsdon D, Zhu L, Schoolcraft WB, Krisher RL, Jiang Z, Yuan Y. In vitro culture alters cell lineage composition and cellular metabolism of bovine blastocyst. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2024; 111: 11\u201327.","DOI":"10.1093\/biolre\/ioae031"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"40. Degrelle SA, Campion E, Cabau C, Piumi F, Reinaud P, Richard C, Renard JP, Hue I. Molecular evidence for a critical period in mural trophoblast development in bovine blastocysts. Dev Biol<\/i> 2005; 288: 448\u2013460.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ydbio.2005.09.043"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"41. Davenport KM, Ortega MS, Johnson GA, Seo H, Spencer TE. Review: Implantation and placentation in ruminants. Animal<\/i> 2023; 17(Suppl 1): 100796.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.animal.2023.100796"},{"key":"42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"42. S\u00e1nchez JM, Simintiras CA, Lonergan P. Aspects of embryo-maternal communication in establishment of pregnancy in cattle. Anim Reprod<\/i> 2019; 16: 376\u2013385.","DOI":"10.21451\/1984-3143-AR2019-0075"},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"43. Isaac E, Pfeffer PL. Growing cattle embryos beyond Day 8 - An investigation of media components. Theriogenology<\/i> 2021; 161: 273\u2013284.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2020.12.010"},{"key":"44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"44. Ramos-Ibeas P, Lamas-Toranzo I, Mart\u00ednez-Moro \u00c1, de Frutos C, Quiroga AC, Zurita E, Bermejo-\u00c1lvarez P. Embryonic disc formation following post-hatching bovine embryo development in vitro. Reproduction<\/i> 2020; 160: 579\u2013589.","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-20-0243"},{"key":"45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"45. Lonergan P, Woods A, Fair T, Carter F, Rizos D, Ward F, Quinn K, Evans A. Effect of embryo source and recipient progesterone environment on embryo development in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev<\/i> 2007; 19: 861\u2013868.","DOI":"10.1071\/RD07089"},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"46. Rabaglino MB, O\u2019Doherty A, Bojsen-M\u00f8ller Secher J, Lonergan P, Hyttel P, Fair T, Kadarmideen HN. Application of multi-omics data integration and machine learning approaches to identify epigenetic and transcriptomic differences between in vitro and in vivo produced bovine embryos. PLoS One<\/i> 2021; 16: e0252096.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0252096"},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"47. Leme LO, Machado GM, Fidelis AAG, Guimar\u00e3es ALS, Spr\u00edcigo JFW, Carvalho JO, Pivato I, Franco MM, Dode MAN. Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim<\/i> 2021; 57: 598\u2013609.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11626-021-00599-x"},{"key":"48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"48. Biase FH, Moorey SE, Schnuelle JG, Rodning S, Ortega MS, Spencer TE. Extensive rewiring of the gene regulatory interactions between in vitro-produced conceptuses and endometrium during attachment. PNAS Nexus<\/i> 2023; 2: pgad284.","DOI":"10.1093\/pnasnexus\/pgad284"},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"49. Dietrich B, Haider S, Meinhardt G, Pollheimer J, Kn\u00f6fler M. WNT and NOTCH signaling in human trophoblast development and differentiation. Cell Mol Life Sci<\/i> 2022; 79: 292.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00018-022-04285-3"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"50. Betsha S, Hoelker M, Salilew-Wondim D, Held E, Rings F, Grosse-Brinkhause C, Cinar MU, Havlicek V, Besenfelder U, Tholen E, Looft C, Schellander K, Tesfaye D. Transcriptome profile of bovine elongated conceptus obtained from SCNT and IVP pregnancies. Mol Reprod Dev<\/i> 2013; 80: 315\u2013333.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrd.22165"},{"key":"51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"51. Behrens T, Balasubramanian J, Ivask M, N\u00f5mm M, Kavak A, Secher JB, Kadarmideen HN, Rabaglino MB. In vitro processes alter the embryonic disc epigenome and transcriptome in the pre-implantation elongated bovine embryo. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2025; ioaf095.","DOI":"10.1093\/biolre\/ioaf095"},{"key":"52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"52. Desmet KLJ, Marei WFA, Richard C, Sprangers K, Beemster GTS, Meysman P, Laukens K, Declerck K, Vanden Berghe W, Bols PEJ, Hue I, Leroy JLMR. Oocyte maturation under lipotoxic conditions induces carryover transcriptomic and functional alterations during post-hatching development of good-quality blastocysts: novel insights from a bovine embryo-transfer model. Hum Reprod<\/i> 2020; 35: 293\u2013307.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez248"},{"key":"53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"53. Bertolini M, Beam SW, Shim H, Bertolini LR, Moyer AL, Famula TR, Anderson GB. Growth, development, and gene expression by in vivo- and in vitro-produced day 7 and 16 bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev<\/i> 2002; 63: 318\u2013328.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrd.90015"},{"key":"54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"54. Fischer-Brown AE, Lindsey BR, Ireland FA, Northey DL, Monson RL, Clark SG, Wheeler MB, Kesler DJ, Lane SJ, Weigel KA, Rutledge JJ. Embryonic disc development and subsequent viability of cattle embryos following culture in two media under two oxygen concentrations. Reprod Fertil Dev<\/i> 2004; 16: 787\u2013793.","DOI":"10.1071\/RD04026"},{"key":"55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"55. Block J, Fischer-Brown AE, Rodina TM, Ealy AD, Hansen PJ. The effect of in vitro treatment of bovine embryos with IGF-1 on subsequent development in utero to Day 14 of gestation. Theriogenology<\/i> 2007; 68: 153\u2013161.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2007.04.045"},{"key":"56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"56. Loureiro B, Block J, Favoreto MG, Carambula S, Pennington KA, Ealy AD, Hansen PJ. Consequences of conceptus exposure to colony-stimulating factor 2 on survival, elongation, interferon-\u03c4 secretion, and gene expression. Reproduction<\/i> 2011; 141: 617\u2013624.","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-10-0511"},{"key":"57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"57. Zolini AM, Block J, Rabaglino MB, Tr\u00edbulo P, Hoelker M, Rincon G, Bromfield JJ, Hansen PJ. Molecular fingerprint of female bovine embryos produced in vitro with high competence to establish and maintain pregnancy\u2020. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2020; 102: 292\u2013305.","DOI":"10.1093\/biolre\/ioz190"},{"key":"58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"58. Zolini AM, Block J, Rabaglino MB, Rincon G, Hoelker M, Bromfield JJ, Salilew-Wondim D, Hansen PJ. Genes associated with survival of female bovine blastocysts produced in vivo. Cell Tissue Res<\/i> 2020; 382: 665\u2013678.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00441-020-03257-y"},{"key":"59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"59. Salilew-Wondim D, Tesfaye D, Rings F, Held-Hoelker E, Miskel D, Sirard MA, Tholen E, Schellander K, Hoelker M. The global gene expression outline of the bovine blastocyst: reflector of environmental conditions and predictor of developmental capacity. BMC Genomics<\/i> 2021; 22: 408.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12864-021-07693-0"},{"key":"60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"60. Barnwell CV, Farin PW, Ashwell CM, Farmer WT, Galphin SP Jr, Farin CE. Differences in mRNA populations of short and long bovine conceptuses on Day 15 of gestation. Mol Reprod Dev<\/i> 2016; 83: 424\u2013441.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrd.22640"},{"key":"61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"61. Rabaglino MB, Salilew-Wondim D, Zolini A, Tesfaye D, Hoelker M, Lonergan P, Hansen PJ. Machine-learning methods applied to integrated transcriptomic data from bovine blastocysts and elongating conceptuses to identify genes predictive of embryonic competence. FASEB J<\/i> 2023; 37: e22809.","DOI":"10.1096\/fj.202201977R"},{"key":"62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"62. Rabaglino MB, Hansen PJ. Development of a formula for scoring competence of bovine embryos to sustain pregnancy. Biochem Biophys Rep<\/i> 2024; 39: 101772.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bbrep.2024.101772"},{"key":"63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"63. Cuellar CJ, Ismail EA, Haimon MLJ, Hoorn QA, Yu F, Rabaglino MB, Hansen PJ. Interactions between type of culture medium and addition of serum on development and gene expression of bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Physiol Genomics<\/i> 2025; 57: 256\u2013265.","DOI":"10.1152\/physiolgenomics.00142.2024"},{"key":"64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"64. Maldonado MBC, Rabaglino MB, Cannon GH, Hansen PJ. Effects of endometrial embryokines on the preimplantation bovine embryo to create a gene expression signature consistent with a high competence phenotype. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2025; 112: 447\u2013457.","DOI":"10.1093\/biolre\/ioaf014"},{"key":"65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"65. Watson AJ. A better way to assess developmental competence of mammalian early embryos? Physiol Genomics<\/i> 2025; 57: 447\u2013449.","DOI":"10.1152\/physiolgenomics.00055.2025"},{"key":"66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"66. Hansen PJ. Implications of assisted reproductive technologies for pregnancy outcomes in mammals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci<\/i> 2020; 8: 395\u2013413.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-animal-021419-084010"},{"key":"67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"67. Farin CE, Farmer WT, Farin PW. Pregnancy recognition and abnormal offspring syndrome in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev<\/i> 2010; 22: 75\u201387.","DOI":"10.1071\/RD09217"},{"key":"68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"68. Bonilla L, Block J, Denicol AC, Hansen PJ. Consequences of transfer of an in vitro-produced embryo for the dam and resultant calf. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2014; 97: 229\u2013239.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2013-6943"},{"key":"69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"69. Nava-Trujillo H, Rivera RM. Review: Large offspring syndrome in ruminants: current status and prediction during pregnancy. Animal<\/i> 2023; 17(Suppl 1): 100740.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.animal.2023.100740"},{"key":"70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"70. Young LE, Sinclair KD, Wilmut I. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod<\/i> 1998; 3: 155\u2013163.","DOI":"10.1530\/ror.0.0030155"},{"key":"71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"71. Sinclair KD, McEvoy TG, Maxfield EK, Maltin CA, Young LE, Wilmut I, Broadbent PJ, Robinson JJ. Aberrant fetal growth and development after in vitro culture of sheep zygotes. J Reprod Fertil<\/i> 1999; 116: 177\u2013186.","DOI":"10.1530\/jrf.0.1160177"},{"key":"72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"72. Rooke JA, McEvoy TG, Ashworth CJ, Robinson JJ, Wilmut I, Young LE, Sinclair KD. Ovine fetal development is more sensitive to perturbation by the presence of serum in embryo culture before rather than after compaction. Theriogenology<\/i> 2007; 67: 639\u2013647.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2006.09.040"},{"key":"73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"73. Li Y, Sena Lopes J, Coy-Fuster P, Rivera RM. Spontaneous and ART-induced large offspring syndrome: similarities and differences in DNA methylome. Epigenetics<\/i> 2022; 17: 1477\u20131496.","DOI":"10.1080\/15592294.2022.2067938"},{"key":"74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"74. Chen Z, Robbins KM, Wells KD, Rivera RM. Large offspring syndrome: a bovine model for the human loss-of-imprinting overgrowth syndrome Beckwith-Wiedemann. Epigenetics<\/i> 2013; 8: 591\u2013601.","DOI":"10.4161\/epi.24655"},{"key":"75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"75. Rivera RM, Goldkamp AK, Patel BN, Hagen DE, Soto-Moreno EJ, Li Y, Kim CN, Miller C, Williams F 3rd, Jannaman E, Xiao Y, Tribulo P, Estrada-Cort\u00e9s E, Brau-Rodr\u00edguez AR, Hansen PJ, Wu Z, Spinka CM, Martin N, Elsik CG. Identification of large offspring syndrome during pregnancy through ultrasonography and maternal blood transcriptome analyses. Sci Rep<\/i> 2022; 12: 10540.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-14597-w"},{"key":"76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"76. Siqueira LGB, Dikmen S, Ortega MS, Hansen PJ. Postnatal phenotype of dairy cows is altered by in vitro embryo production using reverse X-sorted semen. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2017; 100: 5899\u20135908.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2016-12539"},{"key":"77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"77. Chen Z, Hagen DE, Elsik CG, Ji T, Morris CJ, Moon LE, Rivera RM. Characterization of global loss of imprinting in fetal overgrowth syndrome induced by assisted reproduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA<\/i> 2015; 112: 4618\u20134623.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1422088112"},{"key":"78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"78. Chen Z, Hagen DE, Ji T, Elsik CG, Rivera RM. Global misregulation of genes largely uncoupled to DNA methylome epimutations characterizes a congenital overgrowth syndrome. Sci Rep<\/i> 2017; 7: 12667.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-017-13012-z"},{"key":"79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"79. Pendleton AL, Wesolowski SR, Regnault TRH, Lynch RM, Limesand SW. Dimming the powerhouse: mitochondrial dysfunction in the liver and skeletal muscle of intrauterine growth restricted fetuses. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)<\/i> 2021; 12: 612888.","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2021.612888"},{"key":"80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"80. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol<\/i> 2014; 15: 550.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13059-014-0550-8"},{"key":"81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"81. Ge SX, Jung D, Yao R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics<\/i> 2020; 36: 2628\u20132629.","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/btz931"},{"key":"82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"82. Johanson JM, Berger PJ. Birth weight as a predictor of calving ease and perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2003; 86: 3745\u20133755.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.S0022-0302(03)73981-2"},{"key":"83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"83. Lombard JE, Garry FB, Tomlinson SM, Garber LP. Impacts of dystocia on health and survival of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2007; 90: 1751\u20131760.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2006-295"},{"key":"84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"84. Rotheneder S, Gonz\u00e1lez-Grajales LA, Beck H, Bootz F, Bollwein H. Variability of bovine conceptus-related volumes in early pregnancy measured with transrectal 3-dimensional ultrasonography. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2022; 105: 4534\u20134546.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2021-21006"},{"key":"85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"85. De Los Santos JA, Andrade JPN, Cangiano LR, Iriarte A, Pe\u00f1agaricano F, Parrish JJ. Transcriptomic analysis reveals gene expression changes in peripheral white blood cells of cows after embryo transfer: Implications for pregnancy tolerance. Reprod Domest Anim<\/i> 2023; 58: 946\u2013954.","DOI":"10.1111\/rda.14371"},{"key":"86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"86. Strangstalien A, Braz CU, Miyamoto A, Marey M, Khatib H. Early transcriptomic changes in peripheral blood 7 days after embryo transfer in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2024; 107: 3080\u20133089.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2023-24199"},{"key":"87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"87. Rabaglino MB, S\u00e1nchez JM, McDonald M, O\u2019Callaghan E, Lonergan P. Maternal blood transcriptome as a sensor of fetal organ maturation at the end of organogenesis in cattle. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2023; 109: 749\u2013758.","DOI":"10.1093\/biolre\/ioad103"},{"key":"88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"88. Assis Neto AC, Pereira FT, Santos TC, Ambrosio CE, Leiser R, Miglino MA. Morpho-physical recording of bovine conceptus (Bos indicus) and placenta from days 20 to 70 of pregnancy. Reprod Domest Anim<\/i> 2010; 45: 760\u2013772.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1439-0531.2009.01345.x"},{"key":"89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"89. Thompson L, van Helvoort PG, Duijn M, Reinders DD, Murphy EM, McDonald M, Crowe AD, Butler ST, Lonergan P, Rabaglino MB. The maternal blood transcriptome reflects changes in fetal growth and is an accurate predictor of birth weight in cattle. FASEB J<\/i> 2025; 39: e71201.","DOI":"10.1096\/fj.202502648R"},{"key":"90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"90. Siqueira LG, Silva MVG, Panetto JC, Viana JH. Consequences of assisted reproductive technologies for offspring function in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev<\/i> 2019; 32: 82\u201397.","DOI":"10.1071\/RD19278"},{"key":"91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"91. Crowe AD, Doyle RC, Lonergan P, Butler ST. Gestation length, calf birth weight, calving difficulty, perinatal mortality, and calf health following timed artificial insemination or embryo transfer with fresh or frozen in vitro-produced embryos. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2025; 108: 12759\u201312773.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2025-26958"},{"key":"92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"92. Lafontaine S, Labrecque R, Blondin P, Cue RI, Sirard MA. Comparison of cattle derived from in vitro fertilization, multiple ovulation embryo transfer, and artificial insemination for milk production and fertility traits. J Dairy Sci<\/i> 2023; 106: 4380\u20134396.","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2022-22736"},{"key":"93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"93. Lafontaine S, Cue RI, Sirard MA. Gestational and health outcomes of dairy cows conceived by assisted reproductive technologies compared to artificial insemination. Theriogenology<\/i> 2023; 198: 282\u2013291.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2023.01.002"},{"key":"94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"94. Rabaglino MB, Bojsen-M\u00f8ller Secher J, Sirard MA, Hyttel P, Kadarmideen HN. Epigenomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal early activation of the HPG axis in in vitro-produced male dairy calves. FASEB J<\/i> 2021; 35: e21882.","DOI":"10.1096\/fj.202101067R"},{"key":"95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"95. Rabaglino MB, Secher JB, Hyttel P, Kadarmideen HN. In vitro- and in vivo-produced male dairy calves show molecular differences in the hepatic and muscular energy regulation. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2022; 107: 1113\u20131124.","DOI":"10.1093\/biolre\/ioac131"},{"key":"96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"96. Thompson L, Crowe AD, Rabaglino MB, Butler ST, Lonergan P. Sex-related changes in liver and muscle transcriptome of calves derived from artificial insemination or the transfer of an in vitro-produced embryo. Biol Reprod<\/i> 2025; 113: 1390\u20131403.","DOI":"10.1093\/biolre\/ioaf169"},{"key":"97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"97. Hoffman GE, Schadt EE. variancePartition: interpreting drivers of variation in complex gene expression studies. BMC Bioinformatics<\/i> 2016; 17: 483.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12859-016-1323-z"},{"key":"98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"98. Hein GJ, Panzani CG, Rodr\u00edguez FM, Salvetti NR, D\u00edaz PU, Gareis NC, Ben\u00edtez GA, Ortega HH, Rey F. Impaired insulin signaling pathway in ovarian follicles of cows with cystic ovarian disease. Anim Reprod Sci<\/i> 2015; 156: 64\u201374.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anireprosci.2015.02.010"},{"key":"99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"99. Opsomer G, Wensing T, Laevens H, Coryn M, de Kruif A. Insulin resistance: the link between metabolic disorders and cystic ovarian disease in high yielding dairy cows? Anim Reprod Sci<\/i> 1999; 56: 211\u2013222.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-4320(99)00048-2"},{"key":"100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"100. Papadimitriou E, Mourkogianni E, Ntenekou D, Christopoulou M, Koutsioumpa M, Lamprou M. On the role of pleiotrophin and its receptors in development and angiogenesis. Int J Dev Biol<\/i> 2022; 66: 115\u2013124.","DOI":"10.1387\/ijdb.210122ep"},{"key":"101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"101. Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Kiefer H, McKay S, Liu GE. Editorial: epigenetic variation influences on livestock production and disease traits. Front Genet<\/i> 2022; 13: 942747.","DOI":"10.3389\/fgene.2022.942747"},{"key":"102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"102. Rabaglino MB, Crowe AD, Moore S, Butler ST, Lonergan P. A blood transcriptomic signature predicts the expression of energy-regulatory genes altered in the skeletal muscle of 3-month-old dairy heifers conceived by in vitro fertilization. Reprod Fertil Dev<\/i> 2023; 36: 264\u2013265.","DOI":"10.1071\/RDv36n2Ab218"},{"key":"103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"103. Scarano WR, Taboga S, Flaws JA. Editorial - Special issue on Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD): Early developmental toxicology and reproductive effects. Reprod Toxicol<\/i> 2024; 124: 108548.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.reprotox.2024.108548"}],"container-title":["Journal of Reproduction and Development"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/jrd\/72\/3\/72_2025-120\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,20]],"date-time":"2026-06-20T03:24:20Z","timestamp":1781925860000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/jrd\/72\/3\/72_2025-120\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"references-count":103,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1262\/jrd.2025-120","relation":{},"ISSN":["0916-8818","1348-4400"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0916-8818","type":"print"},{"value":"1348-4400","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026]]},"article-number":"2025-120"}}