{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]],"date-time":"2026-02-06T21:28:14Z","timestamp":1770413294391,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"IMR Press","issue":"10","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Br J Hosp Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Etomidate and thiopentone are two of the most commonly used induction agents for rapid sequence induction (RSI) in critically ill patients. The use of etomidate infusions for sedation on intensive care has been abandoned following data showing an alarmingly increased mortality in multiply injured trauma patients compared with those managed otherwise (77% vs 28%, P&lt;0.0005) (Watt and Ledingham, 1984). However, the use of etomidate for induction has persisted, despite more recent evidence demonstrating adrenocortical suppression even after single dose administration. Both thiopentone and etomidate are acknowledged to produce quick onset anaesthesia appropriate for emergency RSI, thus it is suggested that the choice between these two agents should be made on their perceived disadvantages rather than advantages.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.12968\/hmed.2006.67.10.22069","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,23]],"date-time":"2014-05-23T09:37:15Z","timestamp":1400837835000},"page":"556-556","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Etomidate vs thiopentone for rapid sequence induction in critically ill patients"],"prefix":"10.31083","volume":"67","author":[{"given":"SR","family":"Moonesinghe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Intensive Care Unit, University College Hospital, London NW1 2BU"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"16242","reference":[{"key":"p_20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-005-2755-5"},{"key":"p_21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.288.7.862"},{"key":"p_22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.2001.02051.x"},{"key":"p_23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199602000-00019"},{"key":"p_24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/69.5.444"},{"key":"p_25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08885.x"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Hospital Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.magonlinelibrary.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.12968\/hmed.2006.67.10.22069","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]],"date-time":"2026-02-06T10:20:00Z","timestamp":1770373200000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.imrpress.com\/journal\/BJHM\/67\/10\/10.12968\/hmed.2006.67.10.22069"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.12968\/hmed.2006.67.10.22069"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12968\/hmed.2006.67.10.22069","relation":{},"ISSN":["1750-8460","1759-7390"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1750-8460","type":"print"},{"value":"1759-7390","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]}}}