{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]],"date-time":"2026-02-06T20:35:53Z","timestamp":1770410153535,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"IMR Press","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Br J Hosp Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Adequate documentation of informed consent is an important aspect of many doctors\u2019 work and failings in this area may result in patient dissatisfaction or litigation. In 2009 the documentation of risks and complications on the consent forms of patients undergoing primary hip replacement was audited at a specialist centre. Following this audit procedure-specific complication stickers were introduced in an attempt to improve the documentation of the consent process. This article discusses the results of a re-audit and aims to determine if this change in practice had resulted in any significant improvement in documentation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>The consent forms of 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip replacement were re-audited using a standardized data collection sheet in order to close the audit loop. The re-audit found that 86 consent forms used the procedure-specific complication sticker to list the potential complications associated with a total hip replacement. Statistically significant improvements in the documentation of fracture, neurovascular damage, leg length discrepancy, failure, premature loosening, death, medical complications, ongoing pain, stiffness, wound healing problems and other were all seen in the 2012 re-audit in comparison to the 2009 audit (P&lt;0.0001).<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>The cheap and simple introduction of procedure-specific complication stickers in order to help surgeons document the process of informed consent has resulted in significant improvements in practice. In the context of patient-focused care and satisfaction in the NHS, it is vital that simple measures such as the introduction of procedure-specific complication stickers are embraced.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.12968\/hmed.2013.74.4.224","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,23]],"date-time":"2014-05-23T08:41:27Z","timestamp":1400834487000},"page":"224-227","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Documenting informed consent in elective hip replacement surgery: a simple change in practice"],"prefix":"10.31083","volume":"74","author":[{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Isherwood","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford OX16 9AL,"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Dean","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford OX16 9AL and"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hemant","family":"Pandit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford OX16 9AL"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"16242","reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2006.03671.x"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.D.02877"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.015"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39588.450127.DB"},{"issue":"2","key":"B5","first-page":"e10","volume":"6","author":"Dean BJF BD","year":"2009","journal-title":"Journal of Orthopaedics"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7472.938-a"},{"key":"B7","volume-title":"Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together","author":"General Medical Council","year":"2008"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000109381"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20120426-28"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39525.658565.80"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1308\/003588402760978201"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)60457-7"},{"key":"B13","volume-title":"National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Surgical data to 31st December 2010","author":"National Joint Registry","year":"2011"},{"key":"B14","volume-title":"National Total Hip Replacement Outcome Study: Final Report to the Department of Health","author":"Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Orthopaedic Association","year":"2000"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7328.39"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2007.05.003"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2005.04150.x"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1308\/003588406X106315"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Hospital Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.magonlinelibrary.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.12968\/hmed.2013.74.4.224","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,6]],"date-time":"2026-02-06T10:08:07Z","timestamp":1770372487000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.imrpress.com\/journal\/BJHM\/74\/4\/10.12968\/hmed.2013.74.4.224"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.12968\/hmed.2013.74.4.224"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12968\/hmed.2013.74.4.224","relation":{},"ISSN":["1750-8460","1759-7390"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1750-8460","type":"print"},{"value":"1759-7390","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}}}