{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,26]],"date-time":"2026-10-26T18:41:41Z","timestamp":1793040101168,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"Mark Allen Group","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Wound Care"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title><jats:p> The objective assessment of chronic wound therapies for exudate management (WRAP study) tested a variety of methods that could be used to improve understanding of dressing performance in the presence of wound exudate, including measurement of the levels of exudate production. The aim of this study was to identify a valid and reliable method of measuring wound exudate production per unit area of wound surface. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method:<\/jats:title><jats:p> Two methods were tested. Method A measured the weight of exudate collected in dressings by \u2018before and after\u2019 weighing of all dressing materials that came into contact with wound exudate. Method B measured wound exudate collected as part of topical negative pressure (TNP) therapy. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p> Method A: Complete data were collected on three patients (at which point the study was halted), but it was only possible to obtain accurate measurements for two of these. Exudate production was 0.10g\/cm<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\/24 hours and 0.21g\/cm<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\/24 hours. It was time-consuming and required special equipment. Method B: Fifteen measurements from five patients were analysed and showed a mean exudate production of 1.3g\/cm<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\/24 hours. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title><jats:p> There are problems with both methods of exudate measurement, but measuring wound fluid collected in TNP canisters seems simpler than weighing dressings and deserves further investigation. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Declaration of interest:<\/jats:title><jats:p> This study was part of the Wrap project and was funded by the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.12968\/jowc.2006.15.4.26897","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,23]],"date-time":"2014-05-23T15:58:40Z","timestamp":1400860720000},"page":"149-153","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["A study comparing two objective methods of quantifying the production of wound exudate"],"prefix":"10.12968","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Dealey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Cameron","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oxford Wound Healing Institute, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Arrowsmith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Skin Health, 3M Health care, Loughborough, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"5130","reference":[{"key":"p_14","first-page":"26","volume":"4","author":"Browne N.","year":"2004","journal-title":"EWMA J"},{"key":"p_15","first-page":"66","volume":"40","author":"Mulder G.D","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ostomy Wound Manage"},{"key":"p_17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/0143-0815\/12\/2\/003"},{"key":"p_18","first-page":"145","volume":"8","author":"Thomas S.","year":"1996","journal-title":"Wounds: Compendium Clin Res Prac"},{"key":"p_19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470774946"},{"key":"p_20","unstructured":"Shmukler, M. Density of blood. In: Elert, G. The Physics Factbook. http:\/\/ hypertextbook.com\/ facts\/2004\/"},{"key":"p_21","unstructured":"MichaelShmukler.shtml (accessed 13\/06\/2005). those with non-infected wounds. However, the aim of the study was to test the method rather than produce definitive data on wound exudate production."}],"container-title":["Journal of Wound Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.magonlinelibrary.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.12968\/jowc.2006.15.4.26897","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,24]],"date-time":"2022-05-24T02:48:20Z","timestamp":1653360500000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.magonlinelibrary.com\/doi\/10.12968\/jowc.2006.15.4.26897"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.12968\/jowc.2006.15.4.26897"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12968\/jowc.2006.15.4.26897","relation":{},"ISSN":["0969-0700","2052-2916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0969-0700","type":"print"},{"value":"2052-2916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,4]]}}}