{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T14:03:58Z","timestamp":1768399438080,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Mark Allen Group","issue":"10","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Wound Care"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p> To estimate the difference between mean interface sub-bandage pressures of two multilayer compression bandage systems in healthy volunteers when supine, standing, exercising and during recovery. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p> Inelastic and elastic compression bandages were randomised to opposite limbs of each participant. Sub-bandage interface pressures for both bandages were compared within person. Participants and study staff were aware of the treatment. A pressure transducer measured sub-bandage pressures on the medial aspect of the lower leg, at the transition of the gastrocnemius muscle into the Achilles tendon (B1). The difference in interface pressure for the two different compression bandages was measured at level B1 during supine resting, standing, exercise and recovery. We defined the pressure difference between active standing and lying as a measure of stiffness, and amplitude as the range of pressures during plantar flexion while standing. The two bandage systems (inelastic and elastic) were applied from the base of the toes to just below knee and remained in place for the duration of the experiment. Elastic bandage consisted of three layers of graduated tubular bandage (83% cotton, 9% Lycra, 8% polyamide). Inelastic or short-stretch bandage consisted of 100% cotton crepe bandage. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p> Interface sub-bandage pressures varied during different activities, but the mean difference in interface pressures between inelastic and elastic bandages was consistently at least 13mmHg. Stiffness was 7.3mmHg higher in the inelastic group (95% CI 5.1\u20139.5). The estimated difference in amplitude of sub-bandage pressure between the bandages during exercise was 15.5mmHg (95% CI 12.2\u201318.9). <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p> We found in vivo interface sub-bandage pressures varied with the type of bandage and activity phase. Inelastic bandages resulted in an increased mean interface sub-bandage pressure when resting and recovering, which was further increased when standing or exercising. Bandage stiffness and amplitude were also greater for inelastic compared with elastic bandages. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conflict of interest<\/jats:title><jats:p> None. <\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.12968\/jowc.2010.19.10.79088","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,5,23]],"date-time":"2014-05-23T16:00:19Z","timestamp":1400860819000},"page":"417-423","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Effect of elasticity on subbandage pressure of three layer tubular compression bandages in healthy volunteers: a RCT"],"prefix":"10.12968","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Weller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia;"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Jolley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia;"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Wolfe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia;"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Myers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Victoria Vein Clinic, Melbourne, Australia."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"McNeil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia;"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"5130","reference":[{"key":"p_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"cullum, n., nelson, e.A., Fletcher,A.W., Sheldon,t.A. compression for venous leg ulcers. cochrane Database Syst rev. 2001; 2: cD000265.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000265"},{"key":"p_2","volume-title":"Flemming, K., Sheldon,t. Systematic reviews of wound care management: (5) beds","year":"2001"},{"key":"p_3","volume-title":"S.venous and arterial leg ulcers. bMJ. 2006","author":"Grey J.e."},{"key":"p_4","volume-title":"relation between aetiology and treatment of leg ulcers. br J Surg. 1996","author":"Holan","year":"2007"},{"key":"p_5","volume-title":"Sheldon,t.A.A systematic review of compression treatment for venous leg ulcers. bMJ. 1997","author":"Fletcher A."},{"key":"p_6","volume-title":"all differences are within-person, comparing each leg with its contralateral pair (n=42 healthy adult volunteers","author":"Panel regression results for six outcome measures.","year":"2009"},{"key":"p_10","first-page":"224","volume":"32","year":"2006","journal-title":"Dermatol Surg."},{"key":"p_11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00042728-200506000-00002"},{"key":"p_13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/phleb.2008.008009"},{"key":"p_14","volume-title":"Simultaneous changes of leg circumference and interface pressure under different compression bandages. eur J vasc endovasc Surg. 2007","author":"Mosti G.b."},{"key":"p_15","first-page":"600","volume":"34","author":"Partsch H.","year":"2008","journal-title":"Dermatol Surg."},{"key":"p_17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/phleb.2008.008057"},{"key":"p_18","first-page":"193","volume":"27","author":"Partsch H.","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int Angiol."},{"key":"p_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Managing patients unable to tolerate therapeutic compression. br J nurs. 2003; 12: (Suppl. 19), S4-13.","DOI":"10.12968\/bjon.2003.12.Sup4.12209"},{"key":"p_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Annells, M., o'neill, J., Flowers, c. compression bandaging for venous leg ulcers: the essentialness of a willing patient. J clin nurs. 2008; 17: 3, 350-359.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2702.2007.01996.x"},{"key":"p_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher, D., Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G.the conSort statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallelgroup randomised trials. lancet. 2001; 357: 9263, 1191-1194.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)04337-3"},{"key":"p_25","volume-title":"b., braun,W. Interface pressure and stiffness of ready made compression stockings: comparison of in vivo and in vitro measurements. J vasc Surg. 2006","author":"Partsch H."},{"key":"p_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"o'Meara, S.,tierney, J., cullum, n. et al. Four layer bandage compared with short stretch bandage for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with data from individual patients. bMJ. 2009; 338, b1344. 19 nelson, e.A., Iglesias, c.P., cullum, n.,torgerson, D.J. randomized clinical trial of four-layer and short-stretch compression bandages for venous leg ulcers (venUS I). br J Surg. 2004; 91: 10, 1292-1299.","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4754"},{"key":"p_27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1742-481X.2008.00487.x"},{"key":"p_28","first-page":"857","volume-title":"I., burg, G.A comparison of multilayer bandage systems during rest, exercise, and over 2 days of wear time.Arch Dermatol. 2000;136: 7","author":"Hafner J."},{"key":"p_29","volume-title":"eur J vasc endovasc Surg. 2005","author":"Partsch H."},{"key":"p_31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1076-0512(97)85049-2"},{"key":"p_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"non-surgical and drug treatments. bMJ 2006; 332: 7546, 900-903.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.332.7546.900"},{"key":"p_34","volume-title":"how evidence-based is nursing practice? J Wound ostomy continence nurs. 2003"},{"key":"p_35","volume-title":"Microlab","author":"Professor Hugo Partsch"}],"container-title":["Journal of Wound Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.magonlinelibrary.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.12968\/jowc.2010.19.10.79088","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,24]],"date-time":"2022-05-24T02:38:52Z","timestamp":1653359932000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.magonlinelibrary.com\/doi\/10.12968\/jowc.2010.19.10.79088"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.12968\/jowc.2010.19.10.79088"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12968\/jowc.2010.19.10.79088","relation":{},"ISSN":["0969-0700","2052-2916"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0969-0700","type":"print"},{"value":"2052-2916","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,10]]}}}