{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T14:33:14Z","timestamp":1791988394370,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2004,7,1]],"date-time":"2004-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1088640000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/TDM"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> We conducted a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of 45 patients (47 elbows), with tennis elbow, who underwent either a formal open release or a percutaneous tenotomy. All patients had pre- and post-operative assessment using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system. Both groups were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Statistical analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test and repeated measured ANOVA showed significant improvements for patient satisfaction (p = 0.012), time to return to work (p = 0.0001), improvements in DASH score (p = 0.001) and improvement in sporting activities (p = 0.046) in the percutaneous group. Those patients undergoing a percutaneous release returned to work on average three weeks earlier and improved significantly more quickly than those undergoing an open procedure. The percutaneous procedure is a quicker and simpler procedure to undertake and produces significantly better results. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.86b5.14469","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,7,1]],"date-time":"2004-07-01T23:32:15Z","timestamp":1088724735000},"page":"701-704","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":124,"title":["A comparison of open and percutaneous techniques in the surgical treatment of tennis elbow"],"prefix":"10.1302","volume":"86-B","author":[{"given":"P. D.","family":"Dunkow","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Trauma and Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, Tameside Hospital, Fountain Street, Ashton under Lyne, Manchester OL6 9RW, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Jatti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Trauma and Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, Tameside Hospital, Fountain Street, Ashton under Lyne, Manchester OL6 9RW, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B. N.","family":"Muddu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Trauma and Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, Tameside Hospital, Fountain Street, Ashton under Lyne, Manchester OL6 9RW, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"42","container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.86B5.14469","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.86B5.14469","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T20:06:39Z","timestamp":1629144399000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/10.1302\/0301-620X.86B5.14469"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,7]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1302\/0301-620X.86B5.14469"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.86b5.14469","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-620X","2044-5377"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-620X","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-5377","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,7]]}}}