{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,9]],"date-time":"2026-11-09T12:25:18Z","timestamp":1794227118682,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,10,1]],"date-time":"2006-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1159660800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/TDM"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> We compared the results ten years after an inverted V-shaped high tibial osteotomy with those of a historical series of conventional closing-wedge osteotomies. The closing-wedge series consisted of 56 knees in 51 patients with a mean follow-up of 11 years (10 to 15). The inverted V-shaped osteotomy was evaluated in 48 knees in 43 patients at a mean follow-up of 14 years (10 to 19). All the patients were scored using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale for osteoarthritis of the knee and radiological assessment. <\/jats:p><jats:p> The pre-operative grade of osteoarthritis was similar in both groups. Post-operatively, the knee function score was graded as satisfactory in 63% (35) of the closing-wedge group but in 89% (43) of the inverted V-shaped osteotomy group. Post-operative radiological examination showed that delayed union and loss of correction occurred more often after a closing-wedge osteotomy than after an inverted V-shaped procedure. <\/jats:p><jats:p> Our study suggests that the inverted V-shaped osteotomy may offer more dependable long-term results than traditional closing-wedge osteotomy. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.88b10.17532","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,29]],"date-time":"2006-09-29T16:53:40Z","timestamp":1159548820000},"page":"1336-1340","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["Inverted V-shaped high tibial osteotomy compared with closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee"],"prefix":"10.1302","volume":"88-B","author":[{"given":"Y.","family":"Aoki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Hokushin Orthopaedic Hospital, Kikusuimotomachi 3-3, Shiroishi-ku, 003-0823, Sapporo, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Yasuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Sports Medicine and Joint Reconstruction Surgery"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Mikami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita-15 Nishi-7 Kita-ku, 060-8638, Sapporo, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Ohmoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita-15 Nishi-7 Kita-ku, 060-8638, Sapporo, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Majima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita-15 Nishi-7 Kita-ku, 060-8638, Sapporo, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Minami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita-15 Nishi-7 Kita-ku, 060-8638, Sapporo, Japan."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"42","reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aglietti P, Rinonapoli E, Stringa G, Taviani A. Tibial osteotomy for the varus osteoarthritic knee. Clin Orthop 1983;176:239\u201351.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198306000-00035"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.43B4.746"},{"key":"R3","unstructured":"Rudan JF, Simurda MA. Valgus high tibial osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop 1991;268:157\u201360."},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199011000-00012"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200012000-00021"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman AT, Bosacco SJ, Kirschner S, Avolio A. Factors influencing long-term results in high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 1987;272:192\u20138.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199111000-00028"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199808000-00021"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/17453676808989473"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nagel A, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. Proximal tibial osteotomy: a subjective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996;78-A:1353\u20138.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199609000-00009"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rudan JF, Simurda MA. High tibial osteotomy: a prospective clinical and roent-genographic review. Clin Orthop 1990;255:251\u20136.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199006000-00033"},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"Aglietti P. High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10- to 21-year study. J Knee Surg 2003;16:21\u20136."},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hernigou PH, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity: a ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69-A:332\u201354.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198769030-00005"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00266324"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nguyen C, Rudan J, Simurda MA, Cooke TDV. High tibial osteotomy compared with high tibial and Maquet procedures in medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 1989;245:179\u201387.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198908000-00029"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF. Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis: survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:469\u201374.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200303000-00011"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Katz KM, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW. Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69-A:225\u201333.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198769020-00009"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards RB 3rd, Seeherman HJ, Bogdanske JJ, et al. Percutaneous injection of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a calcium phosphate paste accelerates healing of a canine tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A: 1425\u201338.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200407000-00010"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coventry MB. Upper tibial osteotomy for gonaruthrosis: the evolution of the operation in the last 18 years and long term results. Orthop Clin North Am 1979;10:191\u2013210.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-5898(20)30585-X"},{"key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198466070-00010"},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.72B2.2312563"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coventry MB. Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1965;47-A:984\u201390.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196547050-00008"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matthews LS, Goldstein SA, Malvitz TA, Katz BP, Kaufer H. Proximal tibial osteotomy: factors that influence the duration of satisfactory function. Clin Orthop 1988;229:193\u2013200.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198804000-00026"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yasuda K, Majima T, Tsuchida T, Kaneda K. A ten to 15-year follow-up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 1992; 282:186\u201395.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199209000-00024"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL. Proximal tibial osteotomy: a critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993;75-A:196\u2013201.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199302000-00006"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vanionpaa S, Laike E, Kirves P, Tjusanen P. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee: a five to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1981;63-A: 938\u201346.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198163060-00011"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tjornstrand BAE, Egund N, Hagstedt BV. High tibial osteotomy: a seven-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clin Orthop 1981;160:124\u201336.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198110000-00017"},{"key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Windsor RE, Insall JN, Vince KG. Technical consideration of total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;70-A:547\u201355.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198870040-00011"},{"key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kettelkamp DB, Wenger DR, Chao EYS, Thompson C. Results of proximal tibial osteotomy: the effects of tibiofemoral angle, stance-phase flexion-extension, and medial-plateau force. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1976;58-A:952\u201360.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197658070-00010"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-197306000-00031"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197355010-00002"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.88B10.17532","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1302\/0301-620X.88B10.17532","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.88B10.17532","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T20:45:36Z","timestamp":1629146736000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/10.1302\/0301-620X.88B10.17532"}},"subtitle":["TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULT"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1302\/0301-620X.88B10.17532"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.88b10.17532","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-620X","2044-5377"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-620X","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-5377","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,10]]}}}