{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T13:38:21Z","timestamp":1762954701603},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,7,1]],"date-time":"2007-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1183248000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/TDM"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> We conducted a randomised prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement of similar design in 174 patients who had bilateral simultaneous knee replacement. The mean follow-up was for 5.6 years (5.2 to 6.1). <\/jats:p><jats:p> The total knee score, pain score, functional score and range of movement were not statistically different (p &gt; 0.05) between the two groups. Osteolysis was not seen in any knee in either group. Two knees (1%) in the mobile-bearing group required revision because of infection; none in the fixed-bearing group needed revision. Excellent results can be achieved with both mobile- and fixed-bearing prostheses of similar design at mid-term follow-up. We could demonstrate no significant clinical advantage for a mobile bearing. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.89b7.18635","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,8,2]],"date-time":"2007-08-02T17:54:42Z","timestamp":1186077282000},"page":"904-910","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":68,"title":["Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients"],"prefix":"10.1302","volume":"89-B","author":[{"given":"Y.-H.","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The Joint Replacement Center of Korea, Ewha Womans University, DongDaeMun Hospital 70, ChongRo 6-Ga, ChongRo-Gu, Seoul (110-783), Korea."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.-Y.","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Joint Replacement Center of Korea, Ewha Womans University, DongDaeMun Hospital 70, ChongRo 6-Ga, ChongRo-Gu, Seoul (110-783), Korea."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.-S.","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Joint Replacement Center of Korea, Ewha Womans University, DongDaeMun Hospital 70, ChongRo 6-Ga, ChongRo-Gu, Seoul (110-783), Korea."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"42","reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:575\u201382.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199704000-00015"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198365050-00006"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992;74-A:980\u20136.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199274070-00004"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bugbee WD, Ammeen DJ, Parks NL, Engh GA. 4- to 10-year results with the anatomic modular total knee. Clin Orthop 1998;348:158\u201365.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199803000-00025"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:1713\u201320.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199511000-00011"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Engh GA. Failure of the polyethylene bearing surface of a total knee replacement within four years: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70-A:1093\u20136.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198870070-00021"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.80B5.0800850"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wright TM, Bartel DL. The problem of surface damage in polyethylene total knee components. Clin Orthop 1986;205:67\u201374.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198604000-00009"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.74B2.1544958"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bartel DL, Bicknel VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;68-A:1041\u201351.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198668070-00010"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199011000-00027"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW. Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1996;210:217\u201322.","DOI":"10.1243\/PIME_PROC_1996_210_415_02"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goodfellow JW, O\u2019Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee: surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a miniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1986;205:21\u201342.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198604000-00005"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200111000-00013"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2003.10.004"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.85B1.13233"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2005-836828"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13\u201314.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198911000-00004"},{"key":"R19","unstructured":"No authors listed. P.F.C\u00ae Sigma knee system. Technical monograph. DePuy, Johnson and Johnson, 2000."},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1976;58-A:754\u201365.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197658060-00003"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1958.10501452"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.83B3.0830397"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jordan LR, Olivo JL, Voorhorst PE. Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997;388:119\u201323.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199705000-00018"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(89)80029-4"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty: current clinical perspectives. Clin Orthop 1992;276:26\u201332.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199203000-00005"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, Mcauley JP, Ginn SD, Engh GA. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert: findings at five to ten years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:2702\u20138.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200512000-00014"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.89B7.18635","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1302\/0301-620X.89B7.18635","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.89B7.18635","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T20:42:40Z","timestamp":1629146560000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/10.1302\/0301-620X.89B7.18635"}},"subtitle":["A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF MID-TERM OUTCOMES USING A SIMILAR DESIGN OF PROSTHESIS"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1302\/0301-620X.89B7.18635"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.89b7.18635","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-620X","2044-5377"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-620X","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-5377","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,7]]}}}