{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T14:42:19Z","timestamp":1780497739119,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,3,1]],"date-time":"2009-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1235865600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/TDM"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> A consecutive series of 372 patients who underwent surgery for disorders of the rotator cuff involving arthroscopic subacromial decompression and open or arthroscopic repairs of the cuff were prospectively investigated as to the comparability of subjective and objective assessment scores of shoulder function. Assessments were made before operation and at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, the Oxford shoulder score and the Constant-Murley score, which was used as a reference. All scores were standardised to a scale of 0 to 100 for comparison. Statistical analysis compared the post-operative course and the mean score for the subjective Disabilities to the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Oxford shoulder score, with the objective Constant score at each interval. A strong correlation was evident between both subjective scores and the Constant score. We concluded that both the subjective scores would be useful substitutes for the Constant score, obviating the need for a trained investigator and the specialist equipment required to perform the Constant score. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.91b3.20714","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,3,3]],"date-time":"2009-03-03T22:48:56Z","timestamp":1236120536000},"page":"367-373","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["Outcome analysis of surgery for disorders of the rotator cuff"],"prefix":"10.1302","volume":"91-B","author":[{"given":"R.","family":"Allom","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust, Lewisham High Street, London SE13 6LH, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Colegate-Stone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Upper Limb Unit, King\u2019s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Gee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent ME7 5N, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Ismail","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Sinha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Upper Limb Unit, King\u2019s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"42","reference":[{"key":"R1","unstructured":"Codman EA, Chipman WW, Clark JG, Kanavel AB, Mayo WJ. Standardisation of hospitals: report of the committee appointed by the Clinical Congress of Surgeons of North America. Trans Clin Con Surg North Am 1913;4:2\u20138."},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.87B2.15305"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.78B2.0780229"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.78B4.0780593"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160\u20134.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198701000-00023"},{"key":"R7","unstructured":"Constant CR. Constant scoring technique for shoulder function. SECEC information 1991 Nr 3."},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2532051"},{"key":"R9","unstructured":"Grassi FA, Tajana MS. The normalization of data in the Constant-Murley score for the shoulder: a study conducted on 563 healthy subjects. Chir Organi Mov 2003;88:65\u201373."},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2004.10.009"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016470410001708230"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(99)90134-9"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2004.12.023"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.83B6.0830877"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001130170019"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-4-11"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Anderson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;71:613\u201318.","DOI":"10.1080\/000164700317362262"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-7-44"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.91B3.20714","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1302\/0301-620X.91B3.20714","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.91B3.20714","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T18:09:45Z","timestamp":1629137385000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/10.1302\/0301-620X.91B3.20714"}},"subtitle":["A COMPARISON OF SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE SCORING TOOLS"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1302\/0301-620X.91B3.20714"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.91b3.20714","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-620X","2044-5377"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-620X","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-5377","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,3]]}}}