{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T10:06:59Z","timestamp":1784282819484,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,1]],"date-time":"2010-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1267401600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/TDM"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> We have investigated the mid-term outcome of total shoulder replacement using a keeled cemented glenoid component and a modern cementing technique with regard to the causes of failure and loosening of the components. <\/jats:p><jats:p> Between 1997 and 2003 we performed 96 total shoulder replacements on 88 patients, 24 men and 64 women with a mean age of 69.7 years (31 to 82). The minimum follow-up was five years and at the time of review 87 shoulders (77 patients) were examined at a mean follow-up of 89.1 months (60 to 127). Cumulative survival curves were generated with re-operations (accomplished and planned), survivorship of the proshesis, loosening of the glenoid (defined as tilt &gt; 5\u00b0 or subsidence &gt; 5 mm), the presence of radiolucent lines and a Constant score of &lt; 30 as the endpoints. <\/jats:p><jats:p> There were two re-operations not involving revision of the implants and the survival rate of the prosthesis was 100.0% for the follow-up period, with an absolute Constant score of &gt; 30 as the endpoint the survival rate was 98%. Radiological glenoid loosening was 9% after five years, and 33% after nine years. There was an incidence of 8% of radiolucent lines in more than three of six zones in the immediate post-operative period, of 37.0% after the first year which increased to 87.0% after nine years. There was no correlation between the score of Boileau and the total Constant score at the latest follow-up, but there was correlation between glenoid loosening and pain (p = 0.001). <\/jats:p><jats:p> We found that total shoulder replacement had an excellent mid-term survivorship and clinical outcome. The surgical and cementing techniques were related to the decrease in radiolucent lines around the glenoid compared with earlier studies. One concern, however, was the fact that radiolucent lines increased over time and there was a rate of glenoid loosening of 9% after five years and 33% after nine years. This suggests that the design of the glenoid component, and the implantation and cementing techniques may need further improvement. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.92b3.23073","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,1]],"date-time":"2010-03-01T00:12:33Z","timestamp":1267402353000},"page":"387-392","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":83,"title":["Mid-term survivorship analysis of a shoulder replacement with a keeled glenoid and a modern cementing technique"],"prefix":"10.1302","volume":"92-B","author":[{"given":"P.","family":"Kasten","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Dresden. Fetcherstrasse 74, Dresden 01307, Dresden, Germany."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Pape","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Raiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Bruckner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Rickert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Zeifang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Loew","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"42","reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03009740600759720"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2005.02.009"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(02)86882-3"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B6.20387"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.88B4.16604"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160\u20134.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198701000-00023"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, et al. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1947\u201356.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.D.02854"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:26\u201334.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200001000-00004"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2005.07.007"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998;80-A:464\u201373.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199804000-00002"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2007.02.135"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martin SD, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS. Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty: survivorship and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1284\u201392.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200506000-00014"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199607000-00014"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B9.22035"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.04.011"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Neer CS 2nd, Watson KC, Stanton FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982;64-A:319\u201337.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198264030-00001"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cofield RH. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984;66-A:899\u2013906.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198466060-00010"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Neer CS 2nd. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1974;56-A:1\u201313.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197456010-00001"},{"key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2004.03.001"},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1054\/arth.2001.20905"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2000.109384"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, et al. The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid lines: results of a multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:2186\u201391.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200212000-00010"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2002.125807"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Luz V, Lichtenberg S. Three-dimensional glenoid deformity in patients with osteoarthritis: a radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A:1301\u20137.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00622"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;58:457\u201381.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1958.10501452"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Resch H, Povacz P, Ritter E, Matschi W. Transfer of the pectoralis major muscle for the treatment of irreparable rupture of the subscapularis tendon. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:372\u201382.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200003000-00008"},{"key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2004.02.010"},{"key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taunton MJ, McIntosh AL, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Total shoulder arthroplasty with a metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component: medium to long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:2180\u20138.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.00966"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tammachote N, Sperling JW, Vathana T, et al. Long-term results of cemented metal-backed glenoid components for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A:160\u20136.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.01613"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.88B5.16466"},{"key":"R31","unstructured":"Cofield RH. Uncemented total shoulder arthroplasty: a review. Clin Orthop 1994;304:86\u201393."},{"key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fox TJ, Cil A, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;17:859\u201363.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2008.11.020"},{"key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B12.22139"},{"key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(97)90081-1"},{"key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2002.120140"},{"key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Szabo I, Buscayret F, Edwards TB, et al. Radiographic comparison of two glenoid preparation techniques in total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2005;431:104\u201310.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000150322.93550.2f"},{"key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2002.124547"},{"key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2005.09.021"},{"key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Collins D, Tencer A, Sidles J, Matsen F 3rd. Edge displacement and deformation of glenoid components in response to eccentric loading: the effect of preparation of the glenoid bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992;74-A:501\u20137.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199274040-00005"},{"key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships: an anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992;74-A:491\u2013500.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199274040-00004"},{"key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, et al. The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:2186\u201391.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200212000-00010"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.92B3.23073","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1302\/0301-620X.92B3.23073","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.92B3.23073","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T17:55:16Z","timestamp":1629136516000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/10.1302\/0301-620X.92B3.23073"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,3]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1302\/0301-620X.92B3.23073"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.92b3.23073","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-620X","2044-5377"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-620X","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-5377","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,3]]}}}