{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T02:52:37Z","timestamp":1787021557102,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,1]],"date-time":"2011-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1296518400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/TDM"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>We compared the medium-term clinical and radiological results of hybrid total hip replacement (THR) with metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) in two groups of 54 young patients matched for age, gender, body mass index and pre-operative levels of activity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>The clinical outcome was assessed by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the EuroQol scores. Radiologically, all hips were assessed for migration and osteolysis, the hybrid THRs for polyethylene wear and the BHRs for a pedestal sign. The mean follow-up of the patients with a hybrid THR was ten years and for those with a BHR, nine years. Four patients with a hybrid THR and one with a BHR had died. In each group five were lost to follow-up. The revision rate of the hybrid THRs was 16.7% (9 of 54) and of the BHRs 9.3% (5 of 54) (p = 0.195). Radiographs of a further eight hybrid THRs demonstrated wear and osteolysis, and they await revision (p = 0.008). Of the unrevised BHRs 90% had radiological changes, of which approximately 50% had progressed over the previous four years. All hybrid THRs demonstrated linear polyethylene wear with a mean of 1.24 mm (0.06 to 3.03). The BHRs recorded superior OHS (p = 0.013), UCLA (p = 0.008), and EuroQol visual analogue scores (p = 0.009).<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>After nine years, patients with BHRs remained more active and had a lower rate of revision than those with hybrid THRs. Both groups demonstrated progressive radiological changes at medium-term follow-up.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.93b2.25625","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,31]],"date-time":"2011-01-31T19:15:08Z","timestamp":1296501308000},"page":"158-163","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients"],"prefix":"10.1302","volume":"93-B","author":[{"given":"R. P.","family":"Baker","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T. C. B.","family":"Pollard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S. J.","family":"Eastaugh-Waring","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G. C.","family":"Bannister","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"42","reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-1077-2"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.92B1.21530"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McMinn D, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C.\n                      Hip resurfacing. In: Bentley G, ed.\n                      European instructional lectures: 11 EFORT Congress, Madrid, Spain\n                      . New York: Springer-Verlag, 2010:133\u201342.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-11832-6_13"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.87B4.15498"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.87B2.15030"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.86B2.14600"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amstutz HC, Beaul\u00e9 PE, Dorey FJ, et al.\n                      Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28\u201339.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200401000-00006"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B7.20213"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-1029-x"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0938-z"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rco.2007.12.009"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/112070000601604S14"},{"key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000238852.08497.92"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0465-3"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/112070000301300104"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.88B5.17354"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198466020-00010"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A.\n                      Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 1996;5:91\u20138.","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.5.2.81"},{"key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0168-8510(96)00822-6"},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeLee JG, Charnley J.\n                      Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976;121:20\u201332.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-197611000-00003"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC.\n                      \u201cModes of failure\u201d of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979;141:17\u201327.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-197906000-00002"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, et al.\n                      Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:161\u20138.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199072020-00002"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(96)80032-5"},{"key":"R24","unstructured":"Herberts P, K\u00e4rrholm J, Garellick G.\n                      The Swedish National Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2004. http:\/\/www.jru.orthop.gu.se (date last accessed 20 October 2010)."},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/17453671003717831"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sochart DH, Porter ML.\n                      The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1599\u2013617.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199711000-00001"},{"key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2007.11.010"},{"key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2004.01.005"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B11.20892"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L, et al.\n                      Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A:1130\u20135.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.00168"},{"key":"R31","unstructured":"No authors listed.\n                      6th Annual Report: National Joint Registry of England and Wales, 2009. http:\/\/www.njrcentre.org.uk (date last accessed 20 October 2010)."},{"key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/17453670903413178"},{"key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/230949900801600215"},{"key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/17453670610045704"},{"key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2009.05.010"},{"key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-008-0563-2"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.93B2.25625","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1302\/0301-620X.93B2.25625","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.93B2.25625","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T14:54:30Z","timestamp":1629125670000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/10.1302\/0301-620X.93B2.25625"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,2]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1302\/0301-620X.93B2.25625"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.93b2.25625","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-620X","2044-5377"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-620X","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-5377","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,2]]}}}