{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,28]],"date-time":"2026-10-28T13:43:24Z","timestamp":1793195004752,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/TDM"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> Surgical decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis involves assessment of clinical parameters and the severity of the radiological stenosis. We suspected that surgeons based surgical decisions more on dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) than on the morphology of the dural sac. We carried out a survey among members of three European spine societies. The axial T2-weighted MR images from ten patients with varying degrees of DSCA and morphological grades according to the recently described morphological classification of lumbar spinal stenosis, with DSCA values disclosed in half the assessed images, were used for evaluation. We provided a clinical scenario to accompany the images, which were shown to 142 responding physicians, mainly orthopaedic surgeons but also some neurosurgeons and others directly involved in treating patients with spinal disorders. As the primary outcome we used the number of respondents who would proceed to surgery for a given DSCA or morphological grade. Substantial agreement among the respondents was observed, with severe or extreme stenosis as defined by the morphological grade leading to surgery. This decision was not dependent on the number of years in practice, medical density or specialty. Disclosing the DSCA did not alter operative decision-making. In all, 40\u00a0respondents (29%) had prior knowledge of the morphological grading system, but their responses showed no difference from those who had not. This study suggests that the participants were less influenced by DSCA than by the morphological appearance of the dural sac. <\/jats:p><jats:p> Classifying lumbar spinal stenosis according to morphology rather than surface measurements appears to be consistent with current clinical practice. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.94b1.27420","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,4]],"date-time":"2012-01-04T19:38:27Z","timestamp":1325705907000},"page":"98-101","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis"],"prefix":"10.1302","volume":"94-B","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Schizas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, H\u00f4pital\rOrthop\u00e9dique, CHUV-University of Lausanne, Av\rP. Decker 4, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Kulik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, H\u00f4pital\rOrthop\u00e9dique, CHUV-University of Lausanne, Av\rP. Decker 4, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"42","reference":[{"key":"r1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.10.033"},{"key":"r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200006010-00016"},{"key":"r3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0707136"},{"key":"r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d"},{"key":"r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00002517-199410000-00004"},{"key":"r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.1100070116"},{"key":"r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd"},{"key":"r8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henderson L, Kulik G, Richarme D, Theumann N, Schizas C. Is spinal stenosis assessment dependent on slice orientation? a magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Spine J 2011:Epub.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1857-8"},{"key":"r9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198706000-00013"},{"key":"r10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj.2009\/12\/699","volume":"12","author":"Manchikanti L","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"key":"r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.111.4.e299"},{"key":"r12","first-page":"85","volume":"6","author":"Leece P","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"r13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Groves RM. Survey errors and survey costs. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1989:81\u2013184,239\u2013356.","DOI":"10.1002\/0471725277"},{"key":"r14","unstructured":"Babbie E.The practice of social research. Ninth ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2001:252."},{"key":"r15","unstructured":"Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Groves RM, Little R. Survey nonresponse in design, data collection, and analysis. In: Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Groves RM, Little R, eds. Survey nonresponse. New York: John Wiley &\n Sons, 2002:3\u201326."},{"key":"r16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.01574"},{"key":"r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.944"},{"key":"r18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000198726.62514.75"},{"key":"r19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000058880.89444.A9"},{"key":"r20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000248132.15231.fe"},{"key":"r21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.81B2.0810234"},{"key":"r22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Danon-Hersch N, Samartzis D, Wietlisbach V, Porchet F, Vader JP. Appropriateness criteria for surgery improve clinical outcomes in patients with low back pain and\/or sciatica. Spine 2010:Epub.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b71a79"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.94B1.27420","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1302\/0301-620X.94B1.27420","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/pdf\/10.1302\/0301-620X.94B1.27420","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T18:47:07Z","timestamp":1629139627000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/online.boneandjoint.org.uk\/doi\/10.1302\/0301-620X.94B1.27420"}},"subtitle":["A survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1302\/0301-620X.94B1.27420"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.94b1.27420","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-620X","2044-5377"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-620X","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-5377","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,1]]}}}