{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T21:40:03Z","timestamp":1706650803229},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308825","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,25]],"date-time":"2003-02-25T21:31:35Z","timestamp":1046208695000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Editor's Introduction"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Andr\u00e9","family":"Fuhrmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[1] \u0142itAlchourr\u00f3n, C. E., and D. Makinson, ``Hierarchies of regulations and their logic,'' pp. 125--148 in <i>New Studies in Deontic Logic<\/i>, edited by R. Hilpinen, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-8484-4_5"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[2] \u0142itAlchourr\u00f3n, C. E., and D. Makinson, ``On the logic of theory change: contraction functions and their associated revision functions,'' <i>Theoria<\/i>, vol. 48 (1982), pp. 14--37.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1982.tb00480.x"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[3] \u0142itAlchourr\u00f3n, C. E., P. G\u00e4rdenfors and D. Makinson, ``On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions,'' <i>The Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 510--530.","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[4] \u0142itvan Benthem, J., <i>Language in Action<\/i>, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00250539"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[5] \u0142itDubois, D., and H. Prade, ``Belief change and possibility theory,'' pp. 142--182 in <i>Belief Revision<\/i>, edited by P. G\u00e4rdenfors, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511526664.006"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[7] \u0142itFuhrmann, A., ``Theory contraction through base contraction,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 20 (1991), pp. 175--203.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00284974"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[8] \u0142itFuhrmann, A., ``On the modal logic of theory change,'' pp. 259--281 in <i>The Logic of Theory Change<\/i>, edited by A. Fuhrmann and M. Morreau, LNAI 465, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0018425"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[9] \u0142itFuhrmann, A., and S. O. Hansson, ``A survey of multiple contractions,'' <i>Journal of Logic, Language and Information<\/i>, vol. 3 (1994), pp. 39--76.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01066356"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[10] \u0142itFuhrmann, A., and I. Levi, ``Undercutting and the Ramsey Test for conditionals,'' <i>Synthese<\/i>, vol. 101 (1994), pp. 157--169.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01064015"},{"key":"11","unstructured":"[11] \u0142itG\u00e4rdenfors, P., ``Conditionals and changes of belief,'' <i>Acta Philosophica Fennica<\/i>, vol. 30 (1978), pp. 381--404."},{"key":"12","unstructured":"[12] \u0142itG\u00e4rdenfors, P., <i>Knowledge in Flux<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988."},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[13] \u0142itG\u00e4rdenfors, P., and D. Makinson, ``Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations,'' <i>Artificial Intelligence<\/i>, vol. 65 (1994), pp. 197--245.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90017-5"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[14] \u0142itG\u00e4rdenfors, P., and H. Rott, ``Belief revision,'' pp. 35-132 in <i>Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming<\/i>, vol. 4, edited by D. M. Gabbay et al., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198537915.003.0002"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] \u0142itGrove, A., ``Two modellings for theory change,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 17 (1988), pp. 157--170.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00247909"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[16] \u0142itHansson, S. O., ``New operators for theory change,'' <i>Theoria<\/i>, vol. 55 (1989), pp. 114--132.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1989.tb00725.x"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[17] \u0142itHansson, S. O., ``Reversing the Levi identity,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 22 (1993), pp. 637--669.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01054039"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[18] \u0142itKatsuno, H., and A. O. Mendelzon, ``Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change,'' <i>Artificial Intelligence<\/i>, vol. 53 (1991), pp. 263--294.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(91)90069-V"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[19] \u0142itKatsuno, H., and A. O. Mendelzon, ``On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it,'' pp. 183--203 in <i>Belief Revision<\/i>, edited by P. G\u00e4rdenfors, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511526664.007"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[21] \u0142itLevi, I., ``Subjunctives, dispositions and chances,'' <i>Synthese<\/i>, vol. 34 (1977), pp. 423--455.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00485649"},{"key":"24","unstructured":"[24] \u0142itLevi, I., <i>For the Sake of the Argument<\/i>, forthcoming from Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"25","unstructured":"[25] \u0142itLewis, D., <i>Counterfactuals<\/i>, Blackwell, Oxford, 1973."},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[26] \u0142itLindstr\u00f6m, S., and W. Rabinowicz, ``Epistemic entrenchment with incomparabilities and relational belief revision,'' pp. 93--126 in <i>The Logic of Theory Change<\/i>, edited by A. Fuhrmann and M. Morreau, LNAI 465, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0018418"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] \u0142itMakinson, D., ``How to give it up,'' <i>Synthese<\/i>, vol. 62 (1985), pp. 347--363.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00869410"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[28] \u0142itMakinson, D., ``On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 16 (1987), pp. 383--394.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00431184"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[29] \u0142itMakinson, D., ``Five faces of minimality,'' <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 52 (1993), pp. 339--379.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01057652"},{"key":"30","unstructured":"[30] \u0142itMakinson, D., and P. G\u00e4rdenfors, ``Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment,'' in <i>TARK II<\/i>, edited by M. Vardi, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 1988."},{"key":"31","unstructured":"[31] \u0142itNebel, B., ``A knowledge level analysis of belief revision,'' pp. 301--311 in <i>Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning<\/i>, edited by R. Brachman et al., Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1989."},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[33] \u0142itRott, H., ``Two methods of constructing contractions and revisions of knowledge systems,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 20 (1991), pp. 149--173.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00284973"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[34] \u0142itRott, H., ``On the logic of theory change: more maps between different kinds of contraction functions,'' pp. 122--141 in <i>Belief Revision<\/i>, edited by P. G\u00e4rdenfors, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511526664.005"},{"key":"36","unstructured":"[36] \u0142itShoham, Y., <i>Reasoning About Change<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988."},{"key":"6","unstructured":"[6] \u0142itFuhrmann, A., <i>Relevant Logics, Modal Logics, and Theory Change<\/i>, Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, 1988."},{"key":"20","unstructured":"[20] \u0142itLevi, I., <i>Gambling with Truth<\/i>, Knopf, New York, 1967."},{"key":"22","unstructured":"[22] \u0142itLevi, I., <i>The Enterprise of Knowledge<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1980."},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[23] \u0142itLevi, I., <i>The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511663819"},{"key":"32","unstructured":"[32] \u0142itde Rijke, M., <i>Extending Modal Logic<\/i>, Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Language, Logic and Information, Amsterdam, 1993."},{"key":"35","unstructured":"[35] \u0142itShackle, G. L. S., <i>Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs<\/i>, second edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969."},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[37] \u0142itSpohn, W., ``Ordinal conditional functions: a dynamic theory of epistemic states,'' pp. 105--134 in <i>Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics<\/i>, vol. 2, edited by W. L. Harper and B. Skyrms, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-2865-7_6"}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308825","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T21:12:23Z","timestamp":1706649143000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-36\/issue-1\/Editors-Introduction\/10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308825.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308825","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]}}}