{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,16]],"date-time":"2026-05-16T19:01:52Z","timestamp":1778958112580,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308830","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,25]],"date-time":"2003-02-25T21:33:27Z","timestamp":1046208807000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Levi Contractions and AGM Contractions: A Comparison"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Sven Ove","family":"Hansson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Erik J.","family":"Olsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[1] Alchourr\u00f3n, D.E., P. G\u00e4rdenfors, and D. Makinson, ``On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Functions for Contraction and Revision,\" <i>The Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 510--530.","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[2] Alchourr\u00f3n, D.E., and D. Makinson, ``The Logic of Theory Change: Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions,\" <i>Theoria<\/i>, vol. 48 (1982), pp. 14--37.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1982.tb00480.x"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[3] Fuhrmann, A., and S.O. Hansson, ``A survey of multiple contraction,\" <i>Journal of Logic, Language and Information<\/i>, vol. 3 (1994), pp. 39--76.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01066356"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[5] Hansson, S.O., ``Belief Contraction Without Recovery,\" <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 50 (1991), pp. 251--260.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370186"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[6] Hansson, S.O., ``A Dyadic Representation of Belief,\" pp. 89--121 in <i>Belief Revision<\/i>, edited by P. G\u00e4rdenfors, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511526664.004"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[7] Hansson, S.O., ``Changes on Disjunctively Closed Bases,\" <i>Journal of Logic, Language and Information<\/i>, vol. 2 (1993), pp. 255--284.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01181682"},{"key":"8","unstructured":"[8] Levi, I., <i>The Enterprise of Knowledge<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1980."},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[9] Levi, I., <i>The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing<\/i>, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511663819"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[10] Makinson, D., ``On the Status of the Postulate of Recovery in the Logic of Theory Change,\" <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 16 (1987), pp. 383--394.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00431184"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[11] Nieder\u00e9e, R., ``Multiple Contraction. A Further Case Against G\u00e4rdenfors' Principle of Recovery,\" pp. 322--334 in <i>The Logic of Theory Change<\/i>, edited by A. Fuhrmann and M. Morreau, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0018427"},{"key":"12","unstructured":"[12] Roberts, F. S., <i>Measurement Theory<\/i>, Addison-Wesley, London, 1979."},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[13] Rott, H., ``Two Methods of Constructing Contractions and Revisions of Knowledge Systems,\" <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 20 (1991), pp. 149--173.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00284973"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[14] Rott, H., ``Belief Contraction in the Context of the General Theory of Rational Choice,\" <i>The Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 58 (1993), pp. 1426--1450. \\endthebibliography","DOI":"10.2307\/2275152"},{"key":"4","unstructured":"[4] G\u00e4rdenfors, P., <i>Knowledge in Flux<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988."}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308830","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T21:12:24Z","timestamp":1706649144000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-36\/issue-1\/Levi-Contractions-and-AGM-Contractions-A-Comparison\/10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308830.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308830","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]}}}