{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]],"date-time":"2026-03-02T22:30:17Z","timestamp":1772490617105,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Notre Dame J. Formal Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]},"DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308833","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,2,25]],"date-time":"2003-02-25T21:34:31Z","timestamp":1046208871000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["On the Revision of Probabilistic Belief States"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Craig","family":"Boutilier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"73","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[1] Adams, E., <i>The Logic of Conditionals<\/i>, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-7622-2"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[2] Alchourr\u00f3n, C., P. G\u00e4rdenfors and D. Makinson, ``On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions,'' <i>The Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/i>, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 510--530.","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[3] Alchourr\u00f3n, C. and D. Makinson, ``On the logic of theory change: safe contraction,'' <i>Studia Logica<\/i>, vol. 44 (1985), pp. 405--422.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370430"},{"key":"5","unstructured":"[5] Boutilier, C., ``Revision sequences and nested conditionals,'' pp. 519--525 in <i>Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence<\/i>, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1993."},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[6] Boutilier, C., ``Conditional logics of normality: a modal approach,'' <i>Artificial Intelligence<\/i>, vol. 68 (1994), pp. 87--154.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90096-5"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[9] Boutilier, C., ``Unifying default reasoning and belief revision in a modal framework,'' <i>Artificial Intelligence<\/i>, vol. 68 (1994), pp. 33--85.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90095-7"},{"key":"10","unstructured":"[10] Cheeseman, P., ``In defense of probability,'' pp. 1002--1009 in <i>Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence<\/i>, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 1985."},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[11] Fuhrmann, A., ``Theory contraction through base contraction,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 20 (1991), pp. 175--203.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00284974"},{"key":"13","unstructured":"[13] G\u00e4rdenfors, P. and D. Makinson. ``Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment,'' pp. 83--95 in <i>Proceedings of the Third Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge<\/i>, edited by M. Y. Vardi, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1988."},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[14] Grove, A., ``Two modellings for theory change,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 17 (1988), pp. 157--170.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00247909"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[15] Hansson, S. O., ``In defense of base contraction,'' <i>Synthese<\/i>, vol. 91 (1992), pp. 239--245.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00413568"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[16] Hansson, S. O., ``In defense of the Ramsey test,'' <i>Journal of Philosophy<\/i>, vol. 89 (1992), pp. 522--540.","DOI":"10.2307\/2941006"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[18] Harper, W. L., ``Rational belief change, Popper functions and counterfactuals,'' pp.73--115 in <i>Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science<\/i>, vol. 1, edited by W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-1853-1_5"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[19] Jeffrey, R. C., <i>The Logic of Decision<\/i>, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.","DOI":"10.2307\/2023748"},{"key":"20","unstructured":"[20] Kyburg, Jr., H. E., <i>Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief<\/i>, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, 1961."},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[22] Lindstr\u00f6m, S. and W. Rabinowicz, ``On the probabilitic representation of non-probabilistic belief revision,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 18 (1989), pp. 69--101.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00296175"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[23] Pearl, J., <i>Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference<\/i>, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1988.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-08-051489-5.50008-4"},{"key":"24","unstructured":"[24] Poole, M., ``Decision-theoretic defaults,'' pp. 190--197 in <i>Proceedings of Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence Conference<\/i>, edited by J. Glasgow and R. Hadley, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1992."},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[25] Rott, H., ``Preferential belief change using generalized epistemic entrenchment,'' <i>Journal of Logic, Language and Information<\/i>, vol. 1 (1992), pp. 45--78.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00203386"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[26] Schlechta, K., ``Theory revision and probability,'' <i>Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic<\/i>, vol. 32 (1991), pp. 307--318.","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093635755"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[27] Spohn, W., ``The representation of popper measures,'' <i>Topoi<\/i>, vol. 5 (1986), pp. 69--74.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00137831"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[30] van Fraassen, B. C., ``Representation of conditional probabilities,'' <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>, vol. 5 (1976), pp. 417--430.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00649400"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[31] van Fraassen, B. C., ``Rational belief and probability kinematics,'' <i>Philosophy of Science<\/i>, vol. 47 (1980), pp. 165--187.","DOI":"10.1086\/288927"},{"key":"4","unstructured":"[4] Boutilier, C., ``Sequences of revisions: on the semantics of nested conditionals,'' Technical Report 92-24, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1992."},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[7] Boutilier, C., ``Iterated revision and minimal revision of conditional beliefs,'' forthcoming in <i>Journal of Philosophical Logic<\/i>.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00248151"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[8] Boutilier, C., ``Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory,'' pp. 75--86 in <i>Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning<\/i>, edited by J. Doyle, E. Sandewall and P. Torasso, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1994.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4832-1452-8.50104-4"},{"key":"12","unstructured":"[12] G\u00e4rdenfors, P., <i>Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988."},{"key":"17","unstructured":"[17] Harman, G., <i>Change in View<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986."},{"key":"21","unstructured":"[21] Levi, I., <i>The Enterprise of Knowledge<\/i>, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1980."},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[28] Spohn, W., ``Ordinal conditional functions: a dynamic theory of epistemic states,'' pp. 105--134 in <i>Causation in Decision, Belief Change and Statistics<\/i>, volume 2, edited by W. L. Harper and B. Skyrms, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-2865-7_6"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"[29] Stalnaker, R. C., ``Probability and conditionals,'' pp. 107--128 in <i>Ifs<\/i>, edited by W. L. Harper, R. Stalnaker and G. Pearce, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1970.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-9117-0_5"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"[32] Williams, P. M., ``Bayesian conditionalization and the principle of minimum information,'' <i>British Journal for the Philosophy of Science<\/i>, vol. 31 (1980), pp. 131--144.","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/31.2.131"}],"container-title":["Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journalArticle\/Download?urlid=10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308833","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T21:12:26Z","timestamp":1706649146000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/projecteuclid.org\/journals\/notre-dame-journal-of-formal-logic\/volume-36\/issue-1\/On-the-Revision-of-Probabilistic-Belief-States\/10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308833.full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1305\/ndjfl\/1040308833","relation":{},"ISSN":["0029-4527"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0029-4527","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1995,1,1]]}}}